Mercedes-Benz Group AG
Mercedes-Benz Group AG (DAI.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DAI.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAI.DE | €70.16 | +0.00% | 0 | 5.42 | €12.94 | N/A |
| CON.DE | €73.28 | +0.03% | 14.6B | 12.49 | €5.84 | +3.43% |
| KBX.DE | €85.95 | +1.18% | 13.7B | 32.49 | €2.61 | +2.06% |
| HLE.DE | €87.00 | +1.05% | 9.6B | 49.66 | €1.74 | +1.10% |
| SHA0.DE | €4.91 | -0.37% | 4.6B | -4.33 | -€1.12 | +5.16% |
| SHA.DE | €4.58 | +3.79% | 3B | 10.17 | €0.45 | N/A |
| GTR.DE | €7.97 | +0.18% | 2.3B | -4.92 | -€1.62 | N/A |
| VTSC.DE | €52.90 | -0.09% | 2.1B | 85.32 | €0.62 | N/A |
| SFQ.DE | €16.04 | +4.02% | 700M | 10.94 | €1.41 | +5.51% |
| ZIL2.DE | €4.38 | +1.74% | 274.3M | -1.86 | -€2.33 | +3.46% |
Stock Comparison
DAI.DE vs CON.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, CON.DE has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while CON.DE trades at €73.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas CON.DE's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CON.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to CON.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check CON.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs KBX.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, KBX.DE has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while KBX.DE trades at €85.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas KBX.DE's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KBX.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to KBX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check KBX.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs HLE.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, HLE.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while HLE.DE trades at €87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas HLE.DE's P/E ratio is 49.66. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLE.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to HLE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check HLE.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs SHA0.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SHA0.DE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while SHA0.DE trades at €4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas SHA0.DE's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHA0.DE's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to SHA0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check SHA0.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs SHA.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SHA.DE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while SHA.DE trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas SHA.DE's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHA.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to SHA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check SHA.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs GTR.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, GTR.DE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while GTR.DE trades at €7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas GTR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTR.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to GTR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check GTR.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs VTSC.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, VTSC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while VTSC.DE trades at €52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas VTSC.DE's P/E ratio is 85.32. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VTSC.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to VTSC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check VTSC.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs SFQ.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SFQ.DE has a market cap of 700M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while SFQ.DE trades at €16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas SFQ.DE's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFQ.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to SFQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check SFQ.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs ZIL2.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, ZIL2.DE has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while ZIL2.DE trades at €4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas ZIL2.DE's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZIL2.DE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to ZIL2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check ZIL2.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs BDT.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, BDT.DE has a market cap of 196.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while BDT.DE trades at €19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas BDT.DE's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDT.DE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to BDT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check BDT.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs NVM.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, NVM.DE has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while NVM.DE trades at €3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas NVM.DE's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVM.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to NVM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check NVM.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs ED4.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, ED4.DE has a market cap of 155.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while ED4.DE trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas ED4.DE's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ED4.DE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to ED4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check ED4.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs PSQ.F Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, PSQ.F has a market cap of 137.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while PSQ.F trades at €0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas PSQ.F's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSQ.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to PSQ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check PSQ.F's competition here
DAI.DE vs GMM.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, GMM.DE has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while GMM.DE trades at €6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas GMM.DE's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMM.DE's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to GMM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check GMM.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs PWO.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, PWO.DE has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while PWO.DE trades at €29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas PWO.DE's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PWO.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to PWO.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check PWO.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs VBX.F Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, VBX.F has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while VBX.F trades at €4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas VBX.F's P/E ratio is -20.95. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VBX.F's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to VBX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check VBX.F's competition here
DAI.DE vs VBX.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, VBX.DE has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while VBX.DE trades at €4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas VBX.DE's P/E ratio is -19.90. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VBX.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to VBX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check VBX.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs P4N.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, P4N.DE has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while P4N.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas P4N.DE's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to P4N.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to P4N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check P4N.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs MSAG.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, MSAG.DE has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while MSAG.DE trades at €1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas MSAG.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MSAG.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to MSAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check MSAG.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs DEX.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, DEX.DE has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while DEX.DE trades at €2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas DEX.DE's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DEX.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to DEX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check DEX.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs H9W.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, H9W.DE has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while H9W.DE trades at €3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas H9W.DE's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to H9W.DE's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to H9W.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check H9W.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs SF3.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SF3.DE has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while SF3.DE trades at €3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas SF3.DE's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SF3.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to SF3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check SF3.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs HGEA.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, HGEA.DE has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while HGEA.DE trades at €1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas HGEA.DE's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HGEA.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to HGEA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check HGEA.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs C0M.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, C0M.DE has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while C0M.DE trades at €2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas C0M.DE's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to C0M.DE's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to C0M.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check C0M.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs PGN.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, PGN.DE has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while PGN.DE trades at €2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas PGN.DE's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PGN.DE's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to PGN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check PGN.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs IS7.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, IS7.DE has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while IS7.DE trades at €2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas IS7.DE's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IS7.DE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to IS7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check IS7.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs SD1.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, SD1.DE has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while SD1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas SD1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SD1.DE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to SD1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check SD1.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs TINC.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, TINC.DE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while TINC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas TINC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TINC.DE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is less volatile compared to TINC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check TINC.DE's competition here
DAI.DE vs OSR.DE Comparison August 2025
DAI.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DAI.DE stands at 0. In comparison, OSR.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DAI.DE is priced at €70.16, while OSR.DE trades at €52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DAI.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.42, whereas OSR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DAI.DE's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OSR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DAI.DE is more volatile compared to OSR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DAI.DE.Check OSR.DE's competition here