County Line Energy Corp.
County Line Energy Corp. CYLC Peers
See (CYLC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYLC | $0.00 | +33.33% | 328910.00 | -0.20 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| DTRUY | $22.79 | +2.52% | 71.27B | 11.17 | $2.04 | +4.83% |
| VOLVF | $29.57 | +3.64% | 60.15B | 12.58 | $2.35 | +6.38% |
| VLVLY | $28.42 | -0.63% | 57.45B | 12.15 | $2.34 | +5.90% |
| VOLAF | $26.00 | N/A | 52.78B | 11.06 | $2.35 | +7.26% |
| DTGHF | $43.56 | +1.32% | 33.47B | 10.57 | $4.12 | +4.36% |
| KMTUF | $29.88 | -1.70% | 27.58B | 9.17 | $3.26 | +4.31% |
| KMTUY | $29.78 | -1.59% | 27.48B | 9.00 | $3.31 | N/A |
| EPIAF | $22.84 | -3.77% | 26.58B | 30.05 | $0.76 | +1.63% |
| EPOKY | $22.14 | N/A | 25.34B | 29.52 | $0.75 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
CYLC vs DTRUY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, DTRUY has a market cap of 71.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while DTRUY trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DTRUY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to DTRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs VOLVF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, VOLVF has a market cap of 60.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while VOLVF trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VOLVF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VOLVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to VOLVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs VLVLY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, VLVLY has a market cap of 57.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while VLVLY trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VLVLY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLVLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to VLVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs VOLAF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, VOLAF has a market cap of 52.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while VOLAF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas VOLAF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VOLAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to VOLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs DTGHF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, DTGHF has a market cap of 33.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while DTGHF trades at $43.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas DTGHF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTGHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to DTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KMTUF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KMTUF has a market cap of 27.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KMTUF trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KMTUF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMTUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KMTUY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KMTUY has a market cap of 27.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KMTUY trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KMTUY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMTUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KMTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs EPIAF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, EPIAF has a market cap of 26.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while EPIAF trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EPIAF's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPIAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to EPIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs EPOKY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, EPOKY has a market cap of 25.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while EPOKY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EPOKY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPOKY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to EPOKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KIGRY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KIGRY has a market cap of 24.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KIGRY trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KIGRY's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KIGRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KIGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs EPIPF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, EPIPF has a market cap of 20.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while EPIPF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EPIPF's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to EPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs OUKPY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, OUKPY has a market cap of 19.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while OUKPY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas OUKPY's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OUKPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to OUKPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs TRATF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, TRATF has a market cap of 17.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while TRATF trades at $34.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TRATF's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRATF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to TRATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KUBTF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KUBTF has a market cap of 13.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KUBTF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KUBTF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KUBTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KUBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs ZLIOY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, ZLIOY has a market cap of 9.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while ZLIOY trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ZLIOY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZLIOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to ZLIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs ZLIOF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, ZLIOF has a market cap of 8.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while ZLIOF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ZLIOF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZLIOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to ZLIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs OUKPF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, OUKPF has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while OUKPF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas OUKPF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OUKPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to OUKPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs SHKLY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, SHKLY has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while SHKLY trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SHKLY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to SHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs SHKLF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, SHKLF has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while SHKLF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SHKLF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHKLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to SHKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs HTCMY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, HTCMY has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while HTCMY trades at $59.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HTCMY's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTCMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to HTCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KNCRY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KNCRY has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KNCRY trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KNCRY's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs HTCMF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, HTCMF has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while HTCMF trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HTCMF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HTCMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to HTCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KNNGF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KNNGF has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KNNGF trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KNNGF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNNGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KNNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KNCRF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KNCRF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KNCRF trades at $57.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KNCRF's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KNCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs KUBTY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, KUBTY has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while KUBTY trades at $55.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KUBTY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KUBTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to KUBTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs SNYYF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, SNYYF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while SNYYF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SNYYF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNYYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to SNYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs WKRCF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, WKRCF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while WKRCF trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WKRCF's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WKRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to WKRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs FIRRF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, FIRRF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while FIRRF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FIRRF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FIRRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to FIRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs PLFRF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, PLFRF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while PLFRF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PLFRF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to PLFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs LKHLY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, LKHLY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while LKHLY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LKHLY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LKHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to LKHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs PLFRY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, PLFRY has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while PLFRY trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PLFRY's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLFRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to PLFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs LONKF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, LONKF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while LONKF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LONKF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LONKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to LONKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs AGGZF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, AGGZF has a market cap of 527.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while AGGZF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AGGZF's P/E ratio is -19.22. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AGGZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to AGGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs FIRRY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, FIRRY has a market cap of 484.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while FIRRY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FIRRY's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FIRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to FIRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs AUSTF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, AUSTF has a market cap of 248.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while AUSTF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AUSTF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AUSTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to AUSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs QGLHF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, QGLHF has a market cap of 175.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while QGLHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas QGLHF's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QGLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to QGLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs TGHLF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, TGHLF has a market cap of 161.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while TGHLF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TGHLF's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TGHLF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to TGHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs PLPKF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, PLPKF has a market cap of 57.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while PLPKF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PLPKF's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLPKF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is less volatile compared to PLPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs BIIAF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, BIIAF has a market cap of 47.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while BIIAF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BIIAF's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIIAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to BIIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs FBRKF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, FBRKF has a market cap of 28.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while FBRKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FBRKF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FBRKF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is less volatile compared to FBRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs CLEV Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, CLEV has a market cap of 14.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while CLEV trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CLEV's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLEV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to CLEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs GWPD Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, GWPD has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while GWPD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GWPD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GWPD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is less volatile compared to GWPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs CUBXF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, CUBXF has a market cap of 4.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while CUBXF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CUBXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CUBXF's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to CUBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs AMMX Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, AMMX has a market cap of 1.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while AMMX trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AMMX's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMMX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to AMMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs AIFM Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, AIFM has a market cap of 692997.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while AIFM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AIFM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIFM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is less volatile compared to AIFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs WWTIF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, WWTIF has a market cap of 531819.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while WWTIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WWTIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WWTIF's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to WWTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs GRSO Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, GRSO has a market cap of 460599.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while GRSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GRSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRSO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is less volatile compared to GRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs CLGPF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, CLGPF has a market cap of 11635.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while CLGPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CLGPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLGPF's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is less volatile compared to CLGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs GRNH Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, GRNH has a market cap of 3847.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while GRNH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GRNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRNH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is less volatile compared to GRNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs ZEVY Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, ZEVY has a market cap of 1319.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while ZEVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ZEVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZEVY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to ZEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs OSRS Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, OSRS has a market cap of 973.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while OSRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas OSRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OSRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to OSRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.
CYLC vs BWOWF Comparison
CYLC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYLC stands at 328910.00. In comparison, BWOWF has a market cap of 800.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYLC is priced at $0.00, while BWOWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYLC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas BWOWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYLC's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWOWF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYLC is more volatile compared to BWOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYLC.