Cyient DLM Limited
Cyient DLM Limited (CYIENTDLM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CYIENTDLM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYIENTDLM.NS | ₹348.40 | +0.00% | 26.7B | 33.56 | ₹10.03 | N/A |
| POWERINDIA.BO | ₹22,837.40 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 125.24 | ₹190.62 | +0.03% |
| POWERINDIA.NS | ₹22,851.00 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 125.17 | ₹190.71 | +0.03% |
| PGEL.NS | ₹606.80 | +0.00% | 174.8B | 62.74 | ₹9.79 | +0.04% |
| PGEL.BO | ₹606.55 | +0.00% | 174.7B | 62.70 | ₹9.79 | +0.04% |
| SYRMA.NS | ₹841.15 | +0.00% | 160.3B | 54.48 | ₹15.28 | +0.18% |
| SYRMA.BO | ₹841.35 | +0.00% | 160.2B | 54.46 | ₹15.27 | +0.18% |
| AVALON.BO | ₹1,031.45 | +0.00% | 68.6B | 71.68 | ₹14.34 | N/A |
| AVALON.NS | ₹1,027.30 | +0.00% | 68.5B | 71.36 | ₹14.38 | N/A |
| KRN.NS | ₹788.40 | -0.01% | 54.6B | 80.65 | ₹10.90 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CYIENTDLM.NS vs POWERINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while POWERINDIA.BO trades at ₹22,837.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas POWERINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 125.24. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POWERINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check POWERINDIA.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs POWERINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, POWERINDIA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while POWERINDIA.NS trades at ₹22,851.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas POWERINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 125.17. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POWERINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to POWERINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check POWERINDIA.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs PGEL.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PGEL.NS has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while PGEL.NS trades at ₹606.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas PGEL.NS's P/E ratio is 62.74. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to PGEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check PGEL.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs PGEL.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PGEL.BO has a market cap of 174.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while PGEL.BO trades at ₹606.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas PGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 62.70. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to PGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check PGEL.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs SYRMA.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SYRMA.NS has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while SYRMA.NS trades at ₹841.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas SYRMA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.48. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SYRMA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to SYRMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check SYRMA.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs SYRMA.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, SYRMA.BO has a market cap of 160.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while SYRMA.BO trades at ₹841.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas SYRMA.BO's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SYRMA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to SYRMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check SYRMA.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs AVALON.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AVALON.BO has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while AVALON.BO trades at ₹1,031.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas AVALON.BO's P/E ratio is 71.68. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVALON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to AVALON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check AVALON.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs AVALON.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, AVALON.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while AVALON.NS trades at ₹1,027.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas AVALON.NS's P/E ratio is 71.36. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVALON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to AVALON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check AVALON.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs KRN.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, KRN.NS has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while KRN.NS trades at ₹788.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas KRN.NS's P/E ratio is 80.65. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to KRN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check KRN.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs CENTUM.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, CENTUM.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while CENTUM.BO trades at ₹2,296.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas CENTUM.BO's P/E ratio is 218.91. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CENTUM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to CENTUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check CENTUM.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs CENTUM.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, CENTUM.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while CENTUM.NS trades at ₹2,294.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas CENTUM.NS's P/E ratio is 218.48. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CENTUM.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to CENTUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check CENTUM.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs CYIENTDLM.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, CYIENTDLM.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while CYIENTDLM.BO trades at ₹348.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas CYIENTDLM.BO's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYIENTDLM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to CYIENTDLM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check CYIENTDLM.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs RISHABH.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, RISHABH.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while RISHABH.BO trades at ₹437.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas RISHABH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RISHABH.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to RISHABH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check RISHABH.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs RISHABH.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, RISHABH.NS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while RISHABH.NS trades at ₹435.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas RISHABH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RISHABH.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to RISHABH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check RISHABH.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs ELPROINTL.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, ELPROINTL.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while ELPROINTL.BO trades at ₹86.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas ELPROINTL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELPROINTL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to ELPROINTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check ELPROINTL.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs IKIO.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, IKIO.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while IKIO.BO trades at ₹148.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas IKIO.BO's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKIO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to IKIO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check IKIO.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs IKIO.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, IKIO.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while IKIO.NS trades at ₹147.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas IKIO.NS's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IKIO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to IKIO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check IKIO.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs IIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, IIL.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while IIL.BO trades at ₹44.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas IIL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IIL.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to IIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check IIL.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs MICEL.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, MICEL.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while MICEL.NS trades at ₹41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas MICEL.NS's P/E ratio is 112.92. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MICEL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to MICEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check MICEL.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs BCCFUBA.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, BCCFUBA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while BCCFUBA.BO trades at ₹166.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas BCCFUBA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.51. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BCCFUBA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to BCCFUBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check BCCFUBA.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs NITIRAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, NITIRAJ.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while NITIRAJ.NS trades at ₹197.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas NITIRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NITIRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to NITIRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check NITIRAJ.NS's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs GUJARATPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, GUJARATPOLY.BO has a market cap of 555M. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while GUJARATPOLY.BO trades at ₹64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas GUJARATPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO's ROE of +1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to GUJARATPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check GUJARATPOLY.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs FINELINE.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, FINELINE.BO has a market cap of 431.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while FINELINE.BO trades at ₹87.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas FINELINE.BO's P/E ratio is 199.33. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FINELINE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to FINELINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check FINELINE.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs INCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, INCAP.BO has a market cap of 365M. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while INCAP.BO trades at ₹72.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas INCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 62.38. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INCAP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to INCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check INCAP.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs JMDVL.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, JMDVL.BO has a market cap of 191M. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while JMDVL.BO trades at ₹6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas JMDVL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JMDVL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to JMDVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check JMDVL.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs PANELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, PANELEC.BO has a market cap of 163.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while PANELEC.BO trades at ₹39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas PANELEC.BO's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PANELEC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to PANELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check PANELEC.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs CONTAINE.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, CONTAINE.BO has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while CONTAINE.BO trades at ₹16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas CONTAINE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CONTAINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is less volatile compared to CONTAINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check CONTAINE.BO's competition here
CYIENTDLM.NS vs TECHCON.BO Comparison February 2026
CYIENTDLM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYIENTDLM.NS stands at 26.7B. In comparison, TECHCON.BO has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYIENTDLM.NS is priced at ₹348.40, while TECHCON.BO trades at ₹99.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYIENTDLM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.56, whereas TECHCON.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYIENTDLM.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TECHCON.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYIENTDLM.NS is more volatile compared to TECHCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYIENTDLM.NS.Check TECHCON.BO's competition here