Cyber Digital, Inc.
Cyber Digital, Inc. CYBD Peers
See (CYBD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYBD | $0.00 | +0.00% | 3353.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ERIXF | $8.58 | -0.16% | 28.59B | 171.52 | $0.05 | +3.18% |
| NOKBF | $5.00 | N/A | 26.15B | 20.00 | $0.25 | +2.84% |
| ZTCOF | $2.86 | N/A | 19.87B | 11.92 | $0.24 | +6.35% |
| FXCNF | $0.80 | N/A | 6.31B | -80.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| AACAY | $4.93 | -0.80% | 5.83B | 23.48 | $0.21 | +0.26% |
| AACAF | $4.75 | N/A | 5.61B | 22.62 | $0.21 | +0.88% |
| FXCNY | $10.75 | +400.00% | 4.24B | -215.00 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| YZOFF | $1.03 | N/A | 2.66B | 4.90 | $0.21 | +1.04% |
| ETCMY | $1.02 | -0.58% | 1.94B | -1.79 | -$0.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CYBD vs ERIXF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 28.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ERIXF trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 171.52. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs NOKBF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 26.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while NOKBF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ZTCOF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 19.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ZTCOF trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs FXCNF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while FXCNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs AACAY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while AACAY trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs AACAF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while AACAF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs FXCNY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 4.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while FXCNY trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -215.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs YZOFF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ETCMY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ETCMY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs HMNKF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while HMNKF trades at $36.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to HMNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs VTKLY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while VTKLY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs VTKLF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while VTKLF trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs HTCKF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and HTCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs ADVOF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ADVOF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -41.70. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs EUTLF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while EUTLF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs UBLXF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 819.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while UBLXF trades at $109.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and UBLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs COBJF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 702.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while COBJF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and COBJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs EVTZF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 642.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while EVTZF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs OKIEF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs EVSBY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 576.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while EVSBY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs OKIEY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 528.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while OKIEY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs SATOF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while SATOF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SATOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and SATOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs FLTCF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 356.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while FLTCF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and FLTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs PAOTF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 279.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while PAOTF trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and PAOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs VNWTF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 173.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while VNWTF trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 64.82. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to VNWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs QTRHF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 125.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while QTRHF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ATSKF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 93.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs NPNZF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 92.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and NPNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs BEWFF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 51.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while BEWFF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and BEWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs ELSLF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and ELSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs SIMTF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 45.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while SIMTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ASROF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ASROF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and ASROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs BYLTF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs CYSNF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 29.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while CYSNF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -69.76. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and CYSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs WSTL Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 23.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while WSTL trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs MILOF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and MILOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs ATGN Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 9.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ATGN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs KPIFF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 8.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while KPIFF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs CYCA Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 8.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while CYCA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ENAFF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs VMNT Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while VMNT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and VMNT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs LTCCF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +8.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and LTCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs MOYFF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 5.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while MOYFF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ISEYF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 4.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ISEYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs HPNN Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs STRH Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs TTLTF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while TTLTF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs WLAN Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and WLAN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs NRRWF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while NRRWF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs NVRVF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while NVRVF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and NVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs LMGR Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs CNTFY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and CNTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs MFCO Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while MFCO trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs TPTW Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 735711.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and TPTW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs ATCLF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 493528.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and ATCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs VCTY Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 479580.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs CRMK Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 441374.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs MLRT Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 426133.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while MLRT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs AXBSF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425865.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ELST Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 395720.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ELST trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and ELST have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs WGNR Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 276900.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and WGNR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs BKSD Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273869.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and BKSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs BDRL Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 267370.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while BDRL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs AAPJ Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 177988.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and AAPJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs CAMPQ Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120572.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ERFB Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84128.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and ERFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs PDXP Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81715.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs EZEN Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72600.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CYBD has daily volatility of 0.00 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.
CYBD vs PMOZ Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68195.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and PMOZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs CRLI Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60539.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and CRLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs ETCIA Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 55198.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ETCIA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and ETCIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs IPTK Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28651.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and IPTK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs FBCE Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 9988.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs OTOW Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8778.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and OTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs UTRK Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5912.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs LTTC Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 4788.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs JUMT Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4647.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while JUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs AVSR Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4086.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and AVSR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs MPEG Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3799.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and MPEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs WIRX Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3500.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while WIRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs VRCM Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 2980.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs IZNN Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2468.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs PRXM Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2386.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and PRXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs RPDT Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2170.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while RPDT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RPDT's ROE of +3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs XCOMQ Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1722.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs RITT Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1554.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ZSTN Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1160.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ABILF Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and ABILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs GNRD Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and GNRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs ZTNO Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs ORSX Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.
CYBD vs TCCO Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 185.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and TCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs HDIH Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and HDIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs LMSC Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and LMSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs STCI Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD and STCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYBD vs BETW Comparison
CYBD plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBD stands at 3353.00. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBD is priced at $0.00, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBD's ROE is +0.62%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBD is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBD.