Culp, Inc.
Culp, Inc. (CULP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CULP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULP | $3.46 | +0.00% | 42.7M | -3.92 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| RL | $376.84 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 26.17 | $14.71 | +0.93% |
| GIL | $71.09 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 23.37 | $3.06 | +1.27% |
| LEVI | $22.25 | +0.00% | 9B | 18.16 | $1.26 | +2.41% |
| VFC | $20.81 | +0.02% | 8.3B | 37.25 | $0.57 | +1.69% |
| KTB | $67.65 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 17.96 | $3.88 | +3.00% |
| UAA | $7.71 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -6.68 | -$1.22 | N/A |
| PVH | $69.67 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 11.03 | $6.54 | +0.21% |
| COLM | $62.62 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 19.82 | $3.24 | +1.87% |
| UA | $7.49 | +0.00% | 3.4B | -6.57 | -$1.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CULP vs RL Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while RL trades at $376.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check RL's competition here
CULP vs GIL Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while GIL trades at $71.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check GIL's competition here
CULP vs LEVI Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while LEVI trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check LEVI's competition here
CULP vs VFC Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while VFC trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VFC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check VFC's competition here
CULP vs KTB Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while KTB trades at $67.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check KTB's competition here
CULP vs UAA Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while UAA trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check UAA's competition here
CULP vs PVH Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while PVH trades at $69.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check PVH's competition here
CULP vs COLM Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while COLM trades at $62.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check COLM's competition here
CULP vs UA Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while UA trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check UA's competition here
CULP vs ZGN Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while ZGN trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check ZGN's competition here
CULP vs HBI Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while HBI trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HBI's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check HBI's competition here
CULP vs FIGS Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while FIGS trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 102.18. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check FIGS's competition here
CULP vs AIN Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while AIN trades at $59.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check AIN's competition here
CULP vs GIII Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while GIII trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check GIII's competition here
CULP vs GOOS Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while GOOS trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 77.88. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check GOOS's competition here
CULP vs OXM Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while OXM trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is -159.08. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OXM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check OXM's competition here
CULP vs SGC Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while SGC trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check SGC's competition here
CULP vs LAKE Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while LAKE trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check LAKE's competition here
CULP vs UFI Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while UFI trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check UFI's competition here
CULP vs FFFZ Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FFFZ has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while FFFZ trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas FFFZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FFFZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to FFFZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check FFFZ's competition here
CULP vs JRSH Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while JRSH trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JRSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check JRSH's competition here
CULP vs VNCE Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while VNCE trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check VNCE's competition here
CULP vs NCI Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while NCI trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check NCI's competition here
CULP vs JL Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while JL trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JL's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check JL's competition here
CULP vs LLL Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check LLL's competition here
CULP vs XELB Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while XELB trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check XELB's competition here
CULP vs PMNT Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while PMNT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -10.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check PMNT's competition here
CULP vs DXYN Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while DXYN trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check DXYN's competition here
CULP vs JXJT Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check JXJT's competition here
CULP vs DLA Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check DLA's competition here
CULP vs PERY Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, PERY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while PERY trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas PERY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to PERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check PERY's competition here
CULP vs SQBG Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check SQBG's competition here
CULP vs EVK Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check EVK's competition here
CULP vs KBSF Comparison February 2026
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 42.7M. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $3.46, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -3.92, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.Check KBSF's competition here