Culp, Inc.
Culp, Inc. CULP Peers
See (CULP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULP | $4.05 | -1.46% | 50.86M | -2.31 | -$1.75 | N/A |
| RL | $280.17 | +0.90% | 17.30B | 25.54 | $10.97 | +1.18% |
| GIL | $50.22 | +0.22% | 7.59B | 19.69 | $2.55 | +2.13% |
| LEVI | $17.84 | +1.48% | 7.05B | 19.82 | $0.90 | +2.94% |
| VFC | $14.42 | +0.70% | 5.62B | -38.97 | -$0.37 | +2.50% |
| PVH | $85.78 | +1.26% | 4.12B | 8.12 | $10.56 | +0.18% |
| KTB | $73.07 | -0.44% | 4.06B | 17.95 | $4.07 | +2.82% |
| COLM | $66.40 | +1.14% | 3.63B | 17.20 | $3.86 | +1.36% |
| UA | $6.32 | +1.94% | 2.80B | -13.45 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| UAA | $6.67 | +1.89% | 2.79B | -14.20 | -$0.47 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CULP vs RL Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 17.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while RL trades at $280.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs GIL Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while GIL trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs LEVI Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 7.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while LEVI trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs VFC Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while VFC trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is -38.97. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs PVH Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while PVH trades at $85.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs KTB Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while KTB trades at $73.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs COLM Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while COLM trades at $66.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs UA Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while UA trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs UAA Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while UAA trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs ZGN Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while ZGN trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.06. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs AIN Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while AIN trades at $67.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs HBI Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while HBI trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs GIII Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while GIII trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs GOOS Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 863.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while GOOS trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs OXM Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 838.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while OXM trades at $56.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs FIGS Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 741.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while FIGS trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 456.00. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs LAKE Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 188.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while LAKE trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs SGC Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 161.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while SGC trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs UFI Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 84.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while UFI trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs JRSH Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while JRSH trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -10.23. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs VNCE Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 21.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while VNCE trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs JL Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 14.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while JL trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs PMNT Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 11.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while PMNT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs LLL Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs NCI Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 8.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while NCI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs DXYN Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 7.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while DXYN trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is more volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs XELB Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while XELB trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs JXJT Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.
CULP vs DLA Comparison
CULP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CULP stands at 50.86M. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CULP is priced at $4.05, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CULP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.31, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CULP's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CULP is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CULP.