Custom Truck One Source, Inc.
Custom Truck One Source, Inc. CTOS-WT Peers
See (CTOS-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTOS-WT | $0.11 | -7.93% | 18B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| URI | $787.79 | +1.76% | 51.2B | 20.42 | $38.59 | +0.87% |
| AER | $115.05 | -0.46% | 20.3B | 10.22 | $11.25 | +0.67% |
| FTAI | $113.14 | -0.63% | 11.6B | 452.72 | $0.25 | +0.79% |
| UHAL-B | $55.99 | +0.59% | 11.1B | 33.11 | $1.69 | N/A |
| UHAL | $61.63 | +0.55% | 11.1B | 36.49 | $1.69 | N/A |
| CAI | $26.72 | +0.79% | 7.6B | -21.38 | -$1.25 | N/A |
| R | $171.59 | +1.74% | 7.1B | 14.97 | $11.46 | +1.88% |
| AL | $58.93 | +0.70% | 6.6B | 10.30 | $5.72 | +1.48% |
| CAR | $177.60 | +3.32% | 6.2B | -2.85 | -$62.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTOS-WT vs URI Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, URI has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while URI trades at $787.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URI's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to URI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to URI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs AER Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, AER has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while AER trades at $115.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AER's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AER's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to AER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAI Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAI has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAI trades at $113.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAI's P/E ratio is 452.72. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAI's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs UHAL-B Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, UHAL-B has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while UHAL-B trades at $55.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UHAL-B's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UHAL-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to UHAL-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs UHAL Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, UHAL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while UHAL trades at $61.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UHAL's P/E ratio is 36.49. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UHAL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to UHAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs CAI Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while CAI trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs R Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, R has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while R trades at $171.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas R's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to R's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to R. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs AL Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, AL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while AL trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AL's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to AL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs CAR Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, CAR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while CAR trades at $177.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAR's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAR's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to CAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs AL-PA Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, AL-PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while AL-PA trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AL-PA's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AL-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to AL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs GATX Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, GATX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while GATX trades at $158.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GATX's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GATX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to GATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs WSC Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, WSC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while WSC trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSC's P/E ratio is 361.13. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WSC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to WSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs PONY Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, PONY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while PONY trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PONY's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PONY's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to PONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs HRI Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, HRI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while HRI trades at $143.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRI's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HRI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to HRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TRTN Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TRTN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TRTN trades at $79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTN's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs HEES Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, HEES has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while HEES trades at $94.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEES's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HEES's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to HEES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs MGRC Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, MGRC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while MGRC trades at $120.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRC's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MGRC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to MGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAIM Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAIM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAIM trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAIM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAIN Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAIN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAIN trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAIN's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAIN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAIO Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAIO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAIO trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAIO's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAIO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAIP Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAIP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAIP trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAIP's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAIP's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TRTN-PA Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TRTN-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TRTN-PA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTN-PA's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRTN-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TRTN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TRTN-PB Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TRTN-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TRTN-PB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTN-PB's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRTN-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TRTN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TRTN-PC Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TRTN-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TRTN-PC trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTN-PC's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRTN-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TRTN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TRTN-PD Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TRTN-PD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TRTN-PD trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTN-PD's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRTN-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TRTN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs HTZ Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, HTZ has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while HTZ trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTZ's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HTZ's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to HTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs HTZWW Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, HTZWW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while HTZWW trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTZWW's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HTZWW's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to HTZWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TGH Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TGH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TGH trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGH's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TRTN-PE Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TRTN-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TRTN-PE trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTN-PE's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRTN-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TRTN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs RCII Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, RCII has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while RCII trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCII's P/E ratio is 81.15. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RCII's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to RCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs PRG Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while PRG trades at $30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to PRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs CTOS Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, CTOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while CTOS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOS's P/E ratio is -35.71. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CTOS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to CTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TGH-PA Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TGH-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TGH-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGH-PA's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGH-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TGH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs TGH-PB Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, TGH-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while TGH-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGH-PB's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGH-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to TGH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs WLFC Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, WLFC has a market cap of 921.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while WLFC trades at $133.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLFC's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WLFC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to WLFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs ALTG-PA Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, ALTG-PA has a market cap of 844.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while ALTG-PA trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTG-PA's P/E ratio is -41.72. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTG-PA's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to ALTG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs VSTS Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, VSTS has a market cap of 807.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while VSTS trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSTS's P/E ratio is -32.26. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VSTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to VSTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs AAN Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, AAN has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while AAN trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAN's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AAN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to AAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs ALTG Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, ALTG has a market cap of 241M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while ALTG trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTG's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to ALTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs MPU Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, MPU has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while MPU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPU's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MPU's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is less volatile compared to MPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs MTMT Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, MTMT has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while MTMT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTMT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to MTMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FPAY Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FPAY has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FPAY trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPAY's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FPAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs MWG Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, MWG has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while MWG trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWG's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MWG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to MWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs ZCAR Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, ZCAR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while ZCAR trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZCAR's ROE of +98.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is less volatile compared to ZCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs BRDS Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, BRDS has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while BRDS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRDS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRDS's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is less volatile compared to BRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs HYRE Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, HYRE has a market cap of 486.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while HYRE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HYRE's ROE of -46.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to HYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs ZCARW Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, ZCARW has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while ZCARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZCARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZCARW's ROE of +98.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to ZCARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAI-PC Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAI-PC trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAI-PC's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAI-PC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAI-PB Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAI-PB trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAI-PB's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAI-PB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs FTAI-PA Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, FTAI-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while FTAI-PA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTAI-PA's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTAI-PA's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to FTAI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs UHALB Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, UHALB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while UHALB trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UHALB's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UHALB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to UHALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs ACY Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, ACY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while ACY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is less volatile compared to ACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.
CTOS-WT vs GFNCP Comparison
CTOS-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTOS-WT stands at 18B. In comparison, GFNCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTOS-WT is priced at $0.11, while GFNCP trades at $101.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTOS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFNCP's P/E ratio is 146.89. In terms of profitability, CTOS-WT's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GFNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTOS-WT is more volatile compared to GFNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTOS-WT.