CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTO | $18.76 | +0.00% | 597.1M | 229.25 | $0.08 | +8.28% |
| VICI | $27.98 | +0.00% | 28.7B | 10.28 | $2.61 | +6.57% |
| WPC | $69.38 | +0.00% | 14.8B | 32.01 | $2.11 | +5.34% |
| EPRT | $32.57 | +0.00% | 6.7B | 24.77 | $1.28 | +3.81% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.1B | 24.42 | $1.76 | +6.20% |
| SRC-PA | $24.26 | +0.46% | 3.8B | 13.55 | $1.79 | +6.20% |
| BNL | $19.36 | +0.00% | 3.6B | 37.26 | $0.50 | +6.20% |
| AFINP | $25.91 | -1.78% | 3.4B | -90.91 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| AFINO | $25.66 | +0.08% | 3.4B | -90.04 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| DBRG-PJ | $16.55 | +0.00% | 3B | -21.76 | -$0.74 | +0.26% |
Stock Comparison
CTO vs VICI Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while VICI trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check VICI's competition here
CTO vs WPC Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while WPC trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check WPC's competition here
CTO vs EPRT Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while EPRT trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check EPRT's competition here
CTO vs SRC Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SRC's competition here
CTO vs SRC-PA Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SRC-PA's competition here
CTO vs BNL Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while BNL trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check BNL's competition here
CTO vs AFINP Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AFINP's competition here
CTO vs AFINO Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AFINO's competition here
CTO vs DBRG-PJ Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while DBRG-PJ trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -21.76. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG-PJ's competition here
CTO vs PSB-PY Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB-PY's competition here
CTO vs DBRG-PH Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while DBRG-PH trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -21.65. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG-PH's competition here
CTO vs DBRG-PI Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while DBRG-PI trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -21.51. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG-PI's competition here
CTO vs DBRG Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while DBRG trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check DBRG's competition here
CTO vs RTLPO Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check RTLPO's competition here
CTO vs RTLPP Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check RTLPP's competition here
CTO vs UE Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while UE trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check UE's competition here
CTO vs NYMTG Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, NYMTG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while NYMTG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas NYMTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NYMTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to NYMTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check NYMTG's competition here
CTO vs GNL Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GNL trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -11.39. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PA Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GNL-PA trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -163.97. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PA's competition here
CTO vs CLNY Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, CLNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while CLNY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas CLNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CLNY's competition here
CTO vs CLNC Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CLNC's competition here
CTO vs AFIN Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AFIN's competition here
CTO vs AAT Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while AAT trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AAT's competition here
CTO vs RTL Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check RTL's competition here
CTO vs GOODN Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GOODN trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -650.29. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOODN's competition here
CTO vs SAFE Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 988.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while SAFE trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SAFE's competition here
CTO vs ESRT Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 864.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while ESRT trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check ESRT's competition here
CTO vs PKST Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while PKST trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PKST's competition here
CTO vs STAR-PG Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR-PG's competition here
CTO vs STAR-PI Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR-PI's competition here
CTO vs STAR-PD Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR-PD's competition here
CTO vs BRSP Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 710.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while BRSP trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -21.06. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check BRSP's competition here
CTO vs STAR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STAR's competition here
CTO vs CTO-PA Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 652.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while CTO-PA trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CTO-PA's competition here
CTO vs GOODO Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 607.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GOODO trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 678.97. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOODO's competition here
CTO vs GOOD Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 566.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GOOD trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 83.57. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOOD's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PD Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 498.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GNL-PD trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PD's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PE Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 486.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GNL-PE trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PE's competition here
CTO vs OLP Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 482M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while OLP trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check OLP's competition here
CTO vs GNL-PB Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 461.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GNL-PB trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -156.62. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GNL-PB's competition here
CTO vs AHH Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while AHH trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AHH's competition here
CTO vs FVR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while FVR trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -70.05. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check FVR's competition here
CTO vs MDV-PA Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 251.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while MDV-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MDV-PA's competition here
CTO vs AHH-PA Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 225.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while AHH-PA trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check AHH-PA's competition here
CTO vs MDRRP Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MDRRP's competition here
CTO vs MDRR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while MDRR trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MDRR's competition here
CTO vs SQFTP Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while SQFTP trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SQFTP's competition here
CTO vs MKZR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while MKZR trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MKZR's competition here
CTO vs SQFT Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while SQFT trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SQFT's competition here
CTO vs CORR-PA Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CORR-PA's competition here
CTO vs GIPR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GIPR trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -11.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GIPR's competition here
CTO vs CORR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORR's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check CORR's competition here
CTO vs GIPRW Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 217.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GIPRW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -11.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GIPRW's competition here
CTO vs SQFTW Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while SQFTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check SQFTW's competition here
CTO vs VER Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, VER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while VER trades at $51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check VER's competition here
CTO vs FSPR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, FSPR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while FSPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check FSPR's competition here
CTO vs PSB Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, PSB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while PSB trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB's competition here
CTO vs STOR Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, STOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while STOR trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STOR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check STOR's competition here
CTO vs APTS Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, APTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while APTS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check APTS's competition here
CTO vs PSB-PX Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, PSB-PX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB-PX's competition here
CTO vs GOODM Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, GOODM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while GOODM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check GOODM's competition here
CTO vs PSB-PZ Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, PSB-PZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check PSB-PZ's competition here
CTO vs MGP Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, MGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while MGP trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is less volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check MGP's competition here
CTO vs VER-PF Comparison March 2026
CTO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO stands at 597.1M. In comparison, VER-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTO is priced at $18.76, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO currently has a P/E ratio of 229.25, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, CTO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.Check VER-PF's competition here