China Sun Group High-Tech Co.
China Sun Group High-Tech Co. CSGH Peers
See (CSGH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGH | $0.00 | N/A | 562 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KYCCF | $406.63 | -2.08% | 98.6B | 35.83 | $11.35 | +0.54% |
| HNHPF | $10.66 | -0.93% | 74B | 13.16 | $0.81 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | N/A | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $15.36 | -0.32% | 28.6B | 17.65 | $0.87 | +2.52% |
| MRAAY | $7.21 | -3.61% | 27B | 16.39 | $0.44 | +0.72% |
| HXGBY | $9.69 | -3.96% | 26B | 23.63 | $0.41 | +1.60% |
| HXGBF | $9.98 | -2.33% | 25.7B | 24.35 | $0.41 | +1.59% |
| TTDKY | $10.43 | -3.47% | 19.8B | 17.09 | $0.61 | +0.90% |
| TTDKF | $9.59 | -10.87% | 18.2B | 15.72 | $0.61 | +2.14% |
Stock Comparison
CSGH vs KYCCF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while KYCCF trades at $406.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HNHPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HNHPF trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HNHAF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs MRAAF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while MRAAF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs MRAAY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while MRAAY trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HXGBY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HXGBY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HXGBF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HXGBF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TTDKY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TTDKY trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TTDKF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TTDKF trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs VEMLY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while VEMLY trades at $44.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs BYDIF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while BYDIF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SNPTF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SNPTF trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs BYDIY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while BYDIY trades at $197.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SOTGY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SOTGY trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SHMZF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs MNBEY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs MNBEF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs IBIDF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while IBIDF trades at $40.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs OMRNY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while OMRNY trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 46.33. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SEPJF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SEPJF trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SEPJY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SEPJY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs AUOTY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while AUOTY trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HRSEF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HPHTF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HPHTF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HPHTY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HPHTY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs VEMLF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HRIBF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TOPCF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs FITGF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while FITGF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TYOYY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TYOYY trades at $69.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 155.33. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs RNSHF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs APELF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs APELY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while APELY trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs CODAF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs KGBLY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs AMANF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs NPEGF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while NPEGF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -156.79. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs VAIAF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs JELLF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs NILRF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs JNPKF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while JNPKF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs JPAVF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs BCNAF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs AITUF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs CAZGF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while CAZGF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs AUDGF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ASAAF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 799.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs BCNAY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 680.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while BCNAY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs KRKNF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 565.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while KRKNF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs VARXF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs JNNDF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs JPDYY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HNMUF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 452.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs KACPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TRUHF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 399.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TRUHF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HROEY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs NNFTF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TTGPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 242.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TTGPF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs NPTSF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 211.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs FUBAF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while FUBAF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SMOPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs CHAEF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs HUDLF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ENMPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs IACYF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ENMPY Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ENMPY trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs IKGPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SDIIF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs MPAD Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SILLF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ACFN Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ACFN trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs AATC Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while AATC trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs YNVYF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while YNVYF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ERMG Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs IEHC Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while IEHC trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs NSCIF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs INRD Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs WELX Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while WELX trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs KESPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs FGRRF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ROBOF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ROBOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs AAIRF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while AAIRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs BMNR Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while BMNR trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SCND Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SCND trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs LCTC Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while LCTC trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs BNSOF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while BNSOF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SIGL Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SIGL trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -19.99. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs GNCLF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ZTSTF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ZTSTF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs ESHSF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TRCK Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TRCK trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs DPLS Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs TNLX Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while TNLX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs SRMX Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs RMTD Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs MRRYF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs VPER Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs VPIM Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.
CSGH vs NXOPF Comparison
CSGH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGH stands at 562. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSGH is priced at $0.00, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CSGH's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGH is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGH.