iShares VII PLC -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
iShares VII PLC -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CSEMU.SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSEMU.SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSEMU.SW | CHF 157.34 | -0.27% | 0 | 13.56 | CHF 11.60 | N/A |
| PGHN.SW | CHF 1,101.50 | -2.09% | 28.5B | 25.55 | CHF 43.11 | +3.75% |
| LYSPH.SW | CHF 241.80 | -0.43% | 19B | N/A | N/A | +1.22% |
| EQCH.SW | CHF 383.00 | +0.01% | 12.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAER.SW | CHF 55.22 | -0.97% | 11.3B | 13.12 | CHF 4.21 | +4.69% |
| IMEA.SW | CHF 79.95 | -0.90% | 10.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IEUC.SW | CHF 5.89 | -0.12% | 10.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SCWS.SW | CHF 6.81 | -0.38% | 10.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.29% |
| XD9C.SW | CHF 145.30 | +0.71% | 9.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LQCE.SW | CHF 4.46 | +0.28% | 8.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSEMU.SW vs PGHN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, PGHN.SW has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while PGHN.SW trades at CHF 1,101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas PGHN.SW's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to PGHN.SW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to PGHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check PGHN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs LYSPH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, LYSPH.SW has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while LYSPH.SW trades at CHF 241.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas LYSPH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to LYSPH.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to LYSPH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check LYSPH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs EQCH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, EQCH.SW has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while EQCH.SW trades at CHF 383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas EQCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EQCH.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to EQCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check EQCH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs BAER.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BAER.SW has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while BAER.SW trades at CHF 55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas BAER.SW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to BAER.SW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to BAER.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check BAER.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IMEA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IMEA.SW has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IMEA.SW trades at CHF 79.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IMEA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IMEA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to IMEA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IMEA.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IEUC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IEUC.SW has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IEUC.SW trades at CHF 5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IEUC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IEUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to IEUC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IEUC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs SCWS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SCWS.SW has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while SCWS.SW trades at CHF 6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas SCWS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SCWS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to SCWS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check SCWS.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs XD9C.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, XD9C.SW has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while XD9C.SW trades at CHF 145.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas XD9C.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XD9C.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to XD9C.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check XD9C.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs LQCE.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, LQCE.SW has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while LQCE.SW trades at CHF 4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas LQCE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to LQCE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to LQCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check LQCE.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs VZN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, VZN.SW has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while VZN.SW trades at CHF 172.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas VZN.SW's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VZN.SW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to VZN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check VZN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs AWESGS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, AWESGS.SW has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while AWESGS.SW trades at CHF 18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas AWESGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AWESGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to AWESGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check AWESGS.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs VHYL.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, VHYL.SW has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while VHYL.SW trades at CHF 60.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas VHYL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VHYL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to VHYL.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check VHYL.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs EMUCHF.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, EMUCHF.SW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while EMUCHF.SW trades at CHF 23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas EMUCHF.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMUCHF.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to EMUCHF.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check EMUCHF.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs WSRUS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, WSRUS.SW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while WSRUS.SW trades at CHF 29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas WSRUS.SW's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to WSRUS.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to WSRUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check WSRUS.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CSSX5E.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CSSX5E.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CSSX5E.SW trades at CHF 202.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CSSX5E.SW's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSX5E.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to CSSX5E.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CSSX5E.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CHDVD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CHDVD.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CHDVD.SW trades at CHF 164.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CHDVD.SW's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CHDVD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to CHDVD.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CHDVD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CHSPI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CHSPI.SW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CHSPI.SW trades at CHF 144.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CHSPI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CHSPI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to CHSPI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CHSPI.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs SHIR.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SHIR.SW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while SHIR.SW trades at CHF 4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas SHIR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to SHIR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check SHIR.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs MVSH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, MVSH.SW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while MVSH.SW trades at CHF 7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas MVSH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MVSH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to MVSH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check MVSH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs MSEC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, MSEC.SW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while MSEC.SW trades at CHF 178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas MSEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MSEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to MSEC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check MSEC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs VONN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, VONN.SW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while VONN.SW trades at CHF 59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas VONN.SW's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VONN.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to VONN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check VONN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CMES.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CMES.SW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CMES.SW trades at CHF 4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CMES.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CMES.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to CMES.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CMES.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs XMCJ.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, XMCJ.SW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while XMCJ.SW trades at CHF 28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas XMCJ.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XMCJ.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to XMCJ.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check XMCJ.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs VJPN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, VJPN.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while VJPN.SW trades at CHF 32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas VJPN.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to VJPN.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to VJPN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check VJPN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs SMICHA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SMICHA.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while SMICHA.SW trades at CHF 121.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas SMICHA.SW's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SMICHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to SMICHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check SMICHA.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs XDUE.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, XDUE.SW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while XDUE.SW trades at CHF 24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas XDUE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XDUE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to XDUE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check XDUE.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IBGX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IBGX.SW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IBGX.SW trades at CHF 150.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IBGX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to IBGX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IBGX.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CSSMI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CSSMI.SW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CSSMI.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CSSMI.SW's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSMI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to CSSMI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CSSMI.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs XSMC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, XSMC.SW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while XSMC.SW trades at CHF 147.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas XSMC.SW's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XSMC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to XSMC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check XSMC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs AUCHAH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, AUCHAH.SW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while AUCHAH.SW trades at CHF 111.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas AUCHAH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AUCHAH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to AUCHAH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check AUCHAH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs FWRA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, FWRA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while FWRA.SW trades at CHF 6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas FWRA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FWRA.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to FWRA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check FWRA.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IMBA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IMBA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IMBA.SW trades at CHF 4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IMBA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IMBA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to IMBA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IMBA.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs EMDA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, EMDA.SW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while EMDA.SW trades at CHF 26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas EMDA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMDA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to EMDA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check EMDA.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IWDC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IWDC.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IWDC.SW trades at CHF 81.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IWDC.SW's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IWDC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to IWDC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IWDC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs XDPC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, XDPC.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while XDPC.SW trades at CHF 58.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas XDPC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XDPC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to XDPC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check XDPC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs SRECHA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SRECHA.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while SRECHA.SW trades at CHF 10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas SRECHA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SRECHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to SRECHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check SRECHA.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs DAXD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, DAXD.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while DAXD.SW trades at CHF 84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas DAXD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DAXD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to DAXD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check DAXD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs HBMN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, HBMN.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while HBMN.SW trades at CHF 169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas HBMN.SW's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to HBMN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to HBMN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check HBMN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CSSMIM.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CSSMIM.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CSSMIM.SW trades at CHF 297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CSSMIM.SW's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSMIM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to CSSMIM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CSSMIM.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IUKD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IUKD.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IUKD.SW trades at CHF 9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IUKD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IUKD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to IUKD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IUKD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs MVEC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, MVEC.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while MVEC.SW trades at CHF 6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas MVEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MVEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to MVEC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check MVEC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IDVY.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IDVY.SW has a market cap of 967.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IDVY.SW trades at CHF 20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IDVY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IDVY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to IDVY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IDVY.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs DMFC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, DMFC.SW has a market cap of 713M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while DMFC.SW trades at CHF 8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas DMFC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DMFC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to DMFC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check DMFC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs FGQD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, FGQD.SW has a market cap of 711.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while FGQD.SW trades at CHF 7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas FGQD.SW's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FGQD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to FGQD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check FGQD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IUSC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IUSC.SW has a market cap of 708.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IUSC.SW trades at CHF 96.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IUSC.SW's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IUSC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to IUSC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IUSC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ASOL.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ASOL.SW has a market cap of 699.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ASOL.SW trades at CHF 93.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ASOL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ASOL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to ASOL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ASOL.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CSSLI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CSSLI.SW has a market cap of 683.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CSSLI.SW trades at CHF 208.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CSSLI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSSLI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to CSSLI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CSSLI.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs XUHY.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, XUHY.SW has a market cap of 597.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while XUHY.SW trades at CHF 10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas XUHY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XUHY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to XUHY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check XUHY.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs STNX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, STNX.SW has a market cap of 589.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while STNX.SW trades at CHF 186.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas STNX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to STNX.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to STNX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check STNX.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs MLP.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, MLP.SW has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while MLP.SW trades at CHF 5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas MLP.SW's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to MLP.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to MLP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check MLP.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CSBGC0.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CSBGC0.SW has a market cap of 499.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CSBGC0.SW trades at CHF 105.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CSBGC0.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSBGC0.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC0.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CSBGC0.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs STZX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, STZX.SW has a market cap of 499.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while STZX.SW trades at CHF 111.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas STZX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to STZX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to STZX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check STZX.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CSGLDC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CSGLDC.SW has a market cap of 479M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CSGLDC.SW trades at CHF 215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CSGLDC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSGLDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to CSGLDC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CSGLDC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs XDCH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, XDCH.SW has a market cap of 422.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while XDCH.SW trades at CHF 25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas XDCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to XDCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to XDCH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check XDCH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ID25.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ID25.SW has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ID25.SW trades at CHF 110.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ID25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ID25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to ID25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ID25.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs DXJD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, DXJD.SW has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while DXJD.SW trades at CHF 41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas DXJD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DXJD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to DXJD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check DXJD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs LEON.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, LEON.SW has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while LEON.SW trades at CHF 17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas LEON.SW's P/E ratio is -593.33. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to LEON.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to LEON.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check LEON.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs USCHWH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, USCHWH.SW has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while USCHWH.SW trades at CHF 46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas USCHWH.SW's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to USCHWH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to USCHWH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check USCHWH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs AETH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, AETH.SW has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while AETH.SW trades at CHF 33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas AETH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AETH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to AETH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check AETH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs COMS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, COMS.SW has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while COMS.SW trades at CHF 12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas COMS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to COMS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to COMS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check COMS.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs SMOR.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SMOR.SW has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while SMOR.SW trades at CHF 95.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas SMOR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SMOR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to SMOR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check SMOR.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CSBGC3.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CSBGC3.SW has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CSBGC3.SW trades at CHF 63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CSBGC3.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CSBGC3.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC3.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CSBGC3.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs STUX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, STUX.SW has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while STUX.SW trades at CHF 186.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas STUX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to STUX.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to STUX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check STUX.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IJPC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IJPC.SW has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IJPC.SW trades at CHF 98.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IJPC.SW's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IJPC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to IJPC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IJPC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs PEHN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, PEHN.SW has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while PEHN.SW trades at CHF 68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas PEHN.SW's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to PEHN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to PEHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check PEHN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs GHYC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, GHYC.SW has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while GHYC.SW trades at CHF 72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas GHYC.SW's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to GHYC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to GHYC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check GHYC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs LQDH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, LQDH.SW has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while LQDH.SW trades at CHF 85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas LQDH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to LQDH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to LQDH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check LQDH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ETHW.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ETHW.SW has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ETHW.SW trades at CHF 30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ETHW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ETHW.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to ETHW.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ETHW.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs EMUC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, EMUC.SW has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while EMUC.SW trades at CHF 8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas EMUC.SW's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EMUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to EMUC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check EMUC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs GAM.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, GAM.SW has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while GAM.SW trades at CHF 0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas GAM.SW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to GAM.SW's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to GAM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check GAM.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs BBN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, BBN.SW has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while BBN.SW trades at CHF 7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas BBN.SW's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to BBN.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to BBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check BBN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ZPAL.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ZPAL.SW has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ZPAL.SW trades at CHF 286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ZPAL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPAL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to ZPAL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ZPAL.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs SPCE.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SPCE.SW has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while SPCE.SW trades at CHF 16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas SPCE.SW's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SPCE.SW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to SPCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check SPCE.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ALPN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ALPN.SW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ALPN.SW trades at CHF 8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ALPN.SW's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ALPN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to ALPN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ALPN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs IT25.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, IT25.SW has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while IT25.SW trades at CHF 109.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas IT25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to IT25.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to IT25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check IT25.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs AADA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, AADA.SW has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while AADA.SW trades at CHF 11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas AADA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AADA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to AADA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check AADA.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs NBEN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, NBEN.SW has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while NBEN.SW trades at CHF 6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas NBEN.SW's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to NBEN.SW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to NBEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check NBEN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs INGS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, INGS.SW has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while INGS.SW trades at CHF 150.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas INGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to INGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to INGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check INGS.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs FOOD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, FOOD.SW has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while FOOD.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas FOOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FOOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to FOOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check FOOD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CPEN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CPEN.SW has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CPEN.SW trades at CHF 3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CPEN.SW's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CPEN.SW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to CPEN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CPEN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs FIND.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, FIND.SW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while FIND.SW trades at CHF 156.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas FIND.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FIND.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to FIND.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check FIND.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs HODLX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, HODLX.SW has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while HODLX.SW trades at CHF 32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas HODLX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to HODLX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to HODLX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check HODLX.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ADOT.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ADOT.SW has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ADOT.SW trades at CHF 1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ADOT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ADOT.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to ADOT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ADOT.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs RUS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, RUS.SW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while RUS.SW trades at CHF 5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas RUS.SW's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to RUS.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to RUS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check RUS.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ABNB.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ABNB.SW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ABNB.SW trades at CHF 53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ABNB.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ABNB.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to ABNB.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ABNB.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ABCH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ABCH.SW has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ABCH.SW trades at CHF 24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ABCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ABCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to ABCH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ABCH.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs AVAX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, AVAX.SW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while AVAX.SW trades at CHF 3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas AVAX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AVAX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to AVAX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check AVAX.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs SBTC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, SBTC.SW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while SBTC.SW trades at CHF 0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas SBTC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to SBTC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to SBTC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check SBTC.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs ADAW.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, ADAW.SW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while ADAW.SW trades at CHF 7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas ADAW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to ADAW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to ADAW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check ADAW.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs EEII.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, EEII.SW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while EEII.SW trades at CHF 2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas EEII.SW's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to EEII.SW's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to EEII.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check EEII.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs DOTW.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, DOTW.SW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while DOTW.SW trades at CHF 1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas DOTW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to DOTW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to DOTW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check DOTW.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs AUTD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, AUTD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while AUTD.SW trades at CHF 101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas AUTD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to AUTD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to AUTD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check AUTD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs TNOD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, TNOD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while TNOD.SW trades at CHF 123.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas TNOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to TNOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to TNOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check TNOD.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs 0P00015M0N.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, 0P00015M0N.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while 0P00015M0N.SW trades at CHF 135.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas 0P00015M0N.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P00015M0N.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to 0P00015M0N.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check 0P00015M0N.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs NEWN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, NEWN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while NEWN.SW trades at CHF 0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas NEWN.SW's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to NEWN.SW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to NEWN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check NEWN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs CASN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, CASN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while CASN.SW trades at CHF 1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas CASN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to CASN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is less volatile compared to CASN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check CASN.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs INSU.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, INSU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while INSU.SW trades at CHF 73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas INSU.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to INSU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to INSU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check INSU.SW's competition here
CSEMU.SW vs FFI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSEMU.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSEMU.SW stands at 0. In comparison, FFI.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSEMU.SW is priced at CHF 157.34, while FFI.SW trades at CHF 26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSEMU.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 13.56, whereas FFI.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSEMU.SW's ROE is N/A, compared to FFI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSEMU.SW is more volatile compared to FFI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSEMU.SW.Check FFI.SW's competition here