iShares Swiss Domestic Government Bond 7-15 ETF (CH)
iShares Swiss Domestic Government Bond 7-15 ETF (CH) (CSBGC0.SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSBGC0.SW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSBGC0.SW | CHF 105.30 | +0.13% | 499.7M | N/A | N/A | +1.16% |
| PGHN.SW | CHF 1,101.50 | -2.09% | 28.5B | 25.55 | CHF 43.11 | +3.75% |
| LYSPH.SW | CHF 241.80 | -0.43% | 19B | N/A | N/A | +1.22% |
| EQCH.SW | CHF 383.00 | +0.01% | 12.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BAER.SW | CHF 55.22 | -0.97% | 11.3B | 13.12 | CHF 4.21 | +4.69% |
| IMEA.SW | CHF 79.95 | -0.90% | 10.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IEUC.SW | CHF 5.89 | -0.12% | 10.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SCWS.SW | CHF 6.81 | -0.38% | 10.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.29% |
| XD9C.SW | CHF 145.30 | +0.71% | 9.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LQCE.SW | CHF 4.46 | +0.28% | 8.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSBGC0.SW vs PGHN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, PGHN.SW has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while PGHN.SW trades at CHF 1,101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGHN.SW's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PGHN.SW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to PGHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check PGHN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs LYSPH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, LYSPH.SW has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while LYSPH.SW trades at CHF 241.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSPH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYSPH.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to LYSPH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check LYSPH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs EQCH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, EQCH.SW has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while EQCH.SW trades at CHF 383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQCH.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to EQCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check EQCH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs BAER.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, BAER.SW has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while BAER.SW trades at CHF 55.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAER.SW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAER.SW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to BAER.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check BAER.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IMEA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IMEA.SW has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IMEA.SW trades at CHF 79.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMEA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to IMEA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IMEA.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IEUC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IEUC.SW has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IEUC.SW trades at CHF 5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEUC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to IEUC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IEUC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs SCWS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, SCWS.SW has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while SCWS.SW trades at CHF 6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCWS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCWS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to SCWS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check SCWS.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs XD9C.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, XD9C.SW has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while XD9C.SW trades at CHF 145.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XD9C.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9C.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to XD9C.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check XD9C.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs LQCE.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, LQCE.SW has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while LQCE.SW trades at CHF 4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQCE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQCE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to LQCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check LQCE.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs VZN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, VZN.SW has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while VZN.SW trades at CHF 172.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZN.SW's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VZN.SW's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to VZN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check VZN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs AWESGS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, AWESGS.SW has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while AWESGS.SW trades at CHF 18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWESGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWESGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to AWESGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check AWESGS.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs VHYL.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, VHYL.SW has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while VHYL.SW trades at CHF 60.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHYL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to VHYL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check VHYL.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs EMUCHF.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, EMUCHF.SW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while EMUCHF.SW trades at CHF 23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMUCHF.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMUCHF.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to EMUCHF.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check EMUCHF.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs WSRUS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, WSRUS.SW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while WSRUS.SW trades at CHF 29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRUS.SW's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRUS.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to WSRUS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check WSRUS.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CSSX5E.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CSSX5E.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CSSX5E.SW trades at CHF 202.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSX5E.SW's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSX5E.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CSSX5E.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CSSX5E.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CHDVD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CHDVD.SW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CHDVD.SW trades at CHF 164.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHDVD.SW's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHDVD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CHDVD.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CHDVD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CHSPI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CHSPI.SW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CHSPI.SW trades at CHF 144.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHSPI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHSPI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CHSPI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CHSPI.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs SHIR.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, SHIR.SW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while SHIR.SW trades at CHF 4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHIR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to SHIR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check SHIR.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs MVSH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, MVSH.SW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while MVSH.SW trades at CHF 7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVSH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MVSH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to MVSH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check MVSH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs MSEC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, MSEC.SW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while MSEC.SW trades at CHF 178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to MSEC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check MSEC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs VONN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, VONN.SW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while VONN.SW trades at CHF 59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VONN.SW's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VONN.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to VONN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check VONN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CMES.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CMES.SW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CMES.SW trades at CHF 4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMES.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMES.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to CMES.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CMES.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs XMCJ.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, XMCJ.SW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while XMCJ.SW trades at CHF 28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMCJ.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMCJ.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to XMCJ.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check XMCJ.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs VJPN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, VJPN.SW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while VJPN.SW trades at CHF 32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VJPN.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VJPN.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to VJPN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check VJPN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs SMICHA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, SMICHA.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while SMICHA.SW trades at CHF 121.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMICHA.SW's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMICHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to SMICHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check SMICHA.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs XDUE.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, XDUE.SW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while XDUE.SW trades at CHF 24.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDUE.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDUE.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to XDUE.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check XDUE.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IBGX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IBGX.SW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IBGX.SW trades at CHF 150.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBGX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to IBGX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IBGX.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CSSMI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CSSMI.SW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CSSMI.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSMI.SW's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSMI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CSSMI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CSSMI.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs XSMC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, XSMC.SW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while XSMC.SW trades at CHF 147.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSMC.SW's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSMC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to XSMC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check XSMC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs AUCHAH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, AUCHAH.SW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while AUCHAH.SW trades at CHF 111.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUCHAH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUCHAH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to AUCHAH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check AUCHAH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs FWRA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, FWRA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while FWRA.SW trades at CHF 6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWRA.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to FWRA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check FWRA.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IMBA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IMBA.SW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IMBA.SW trades at CHF 4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMBA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMBA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to IMBA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IMBA.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs EMDA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, EMDA.SW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while EMDA.SW trades at CHF 26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMDA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMDA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to EMDA.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check EMDA.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IWDC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IWDC.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IWDC.SW trades at CHF 81.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDC.SW's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to IWDC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IWDC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs XDPC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, XDPC.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while XDPC.SW trades at CHF 58.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDPC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDPC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to XDPC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check XDPC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs SRECHA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, SRECHA.SW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while SRECHA.SW trades at CHF 10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRECHA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRECHA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to SRECHA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check SRECHA.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs DAXD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, DAXD.SW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while DAXD.SW trades at CHF 84.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAXD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAXD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to DAXD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check DAXD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs HBMN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, HBMN.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while HBMN.SW trades at CHF 169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBMN.SW's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBMN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to HBMN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check HBMN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CSSMIM.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CSSMIM.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CSSMIM.SW trades at CHF 297.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSMIM.SW's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSMIM.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CSSMIM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CSSMIM.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IUKD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IUKD.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IUKD.SW trades at CHF 9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUKD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUKD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to IUKD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IUKD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs MVEC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, MVEC.SW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while MVEC.SW trades at CHF 6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVEC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MVEC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to MVEC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check MVEC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IDVY.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IDVY.SW has a market cap of 967.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IDVY.SW trades at CHF 20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDVY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDVY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to IDVY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IDVY.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs DMFC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, DMFC.SW has a market cap of 713M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while DMFC.SW trades at CHF 8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMFC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DMFC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to DMFC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check DMFC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs FGQD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, FGQD.SW has a market cap of 711.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while FGQD.SW trades at CHF 7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGQD.SW's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FGQD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to FGQD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check FGQD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IUSC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IUSC.SW has a market cap of 708.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IUSC.SW trades at CHF 96.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSC.SW's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to IUSC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IUSC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ASOL.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ASOL.SW has a market cap of 699.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ASOL.SW trades at CHF 93.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASOL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASOL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to ASOL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ASOL.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CSSLI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CSSLI.SW has a market cap of 683.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CSSLI.SW trades at CHF 208.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSSLI.SW's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSSLI.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CSSLI.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CSSLI.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs XUHY.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, XUHY.SW has a market cap of 597.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while XUHY.SW trades at CHF 10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XUHY.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUHY.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to XUHY.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check XUHY.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs STNX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, STNX.SW has a market cap of 589.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while STNX.SW trades at CHF 186.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STNX.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to STNX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check STNX.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs MLP.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, MLP.SW has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while MLP.SW trades at CHF 5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLP.SW's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLP.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to MLP.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check MLP.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs STZX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, STZX.SW has a market cap of 499.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while STZX.SW trades at CHF 111.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STZX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STZX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to STZX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check STZX.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CSGLDC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CSGLDC.SW has a market cap of 479M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CSGLDC.SW trades at CHF 215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGLDC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSGLDC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CSGLDC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CSGLDC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs XDCH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, XDCH.SW has a market cap of 422.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while XDCH.SW trades at CHF 25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to XDCH.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check XDCH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ID25.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ID25.SW has a market cap of 391.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ID25.SW trades at CHF 110.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ID25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ID25.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to ID25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ID25.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs DXJD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, DXJD.SW has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while DXJD.SW trades at CHF 41.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXJD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXJD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to DXJD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check DXJD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs LEON.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, LEON.SW has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while LEON.SW trades at CHF 17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEON.SW's P/E ratio is -593.33. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LEON.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to LEON.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check LEON.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs USCHWH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, USCHWH.SW has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while USCHWH.SW trades at CHF 46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USCHWH.SW's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USCHWH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to USCHWH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check USCHWH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs AETH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, AETH.SW has a market cap of 285.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while AETH.SW trades at CHF 33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AETH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AETH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to AETH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check AETH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs COMS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, COMS.SW has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while COMS.SW trades at CHF 12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to COMS.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check COMS.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs SMOR.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, SMOR.SW has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while SMOR.SW trades at CHF 95.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMOR.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMOR.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to SMOR.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check SMOR.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CSBGC3.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CSBGC3.SW has a market cap of 241.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CSBGC3.SW trades at CHF 63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSBGC3.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSBGC3.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to CSBGC3.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CSBGC3.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs STUX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, STUX.SW has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while STUX.SW trades at CHF 186.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STUX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STUX.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to STUX.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check STUX.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IJPC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IJPC.SW has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IJPC.SW trades at CHF 98.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPC.SW's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPC.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to IJPC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IJPC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs PEHN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, PEHN.SW has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while PEHN.SW trades at CHF 68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEHN.SW's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEHN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to PEHN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check PEHN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs GHYC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, GHYC.SW has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while GHYC.SW trades at CHF 72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GHYC.SW's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHYC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to GHYC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check GHYC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs LQDH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, LQDH.SW has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while LQDH.SW trades at CHF 85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LQDH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LQDH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to LQDH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check LQDH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ETHW.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ETHW.SW has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ETHW.SW trades at CHF 30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETHW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETHW.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to ETHW.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ETHW.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs EMUC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, EMUC.SW has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while EMUC.SW trades at CHF 8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMUC.SW's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMUC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to EMUC.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check EMUC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs GAM.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, GAM.SW has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while GAM.SW trades at CHF 0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAM.SW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAM.SW's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to GAM.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check GAM.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs BBN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, BBN.SW has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while BBN.SW trades at CHF 7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBN.SW's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN.SW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to BBN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check BBN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ZPAL.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ZPAL.SW has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ZPAL.SW trades at CHF 286.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZPAL.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPAL.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to ZPAL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ZPAL.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs SPCE.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, SPCE.SW has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while SPCE.SW trades at CHF 16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPCE.SW's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPCE.SW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to SPCE.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check SPCE.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ALPN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ALPN.SW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ALPN.SW trades at CHF 8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPN.SW's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALPN.SW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to ALPN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ALPN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs IT25.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, IT25.SW has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while IT25.SW trades at CHF 109.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IT25.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IT25.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to IT25.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check IT25.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs AADA.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, AADA.SW has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while AADA.SW trades at CHF 11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AADA.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AADA.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to AADA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check AADA.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs NBEN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, NBEN.SW has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while NBEN.SW trades at CHF 6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBEN.SW's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NBEN.SW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to NBEN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check NBEN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs INGS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, INGS.SW has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while INGS.SW trades at CHF 150.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INGS.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INGS.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to INGS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check INGS.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs FOOD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, FOOD.SW has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while FOOD.SW trades at CHF 122.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to FOOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check FOOD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CPEN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CPEN.SW has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CPEN.SW trades at CHF 3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPEN.SW's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPEN.SW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CPEN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CPEN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs FIND.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, FIND.SW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while FIND.SW trades at CHF 156.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIND.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIND.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to FIND.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check FIND.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs HODLX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, HODLX.SW has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while HODLX.SW trades at CHF 32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HODLX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HODLX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to HODLX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check HODLX.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ADOT.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ADOT.SW has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ADOT.SW trades at CHF 1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADOT.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADOT.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to ADOT.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ADOT.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs RUS.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, RUS.SW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while RUS.SW trades at CHF 5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUS.SW's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUS.SW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to RUS.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check RUS.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ABNB.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ABNB.SW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ABNB.SW trades at CHF 53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABNB.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABNB.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to ABNB.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ABNB.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ABCH.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ABCH.SW has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ABCH.SW trades at CHF 24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABCH.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABCH.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to ABCH.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ABCH.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs AVAX.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, AVAX.SW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while AVAX.SW trades at CHF 3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVAX.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVAX.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to AVAX.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check AVAX.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs SBTC.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, SBTC.SW has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while SBTC.SW trades at CHF 0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBTC.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBTC.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to SBTC.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check SBTC.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs ADAW.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, ADAW.SW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while ADAW.SW trades at CHF 7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADAW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADAW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to ADAW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check ADAW.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs EEII.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, EEII.SW has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while EEII.SW trades at CHF 2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEII.SW's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEII.SW's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to EEII.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check EEII.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs DOTW.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, DOTW.SW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while DOTW.SW trades at CHF 1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOTW.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOTW.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to DOTW.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check DOTW.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs FFI.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, FFI.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while FFI.SW trades at CHF 26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFI.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFI.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to FFI.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check FFI.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CSEMU.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CSEMU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CSEMU.SW trades at CHF 157.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSEMU.SW's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSEMU.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CSEMU.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CSEMU.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs TNOD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, TNOD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while TNOD.SW trades at CHF 123.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNOD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to TNOD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check TNOD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs NEWN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, NEWN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while NEWN.SW trades at CHF 0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWN.SW's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWN.SW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to NEWN.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check NEWN.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs INSU.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, INSU.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while INSU.SW trades at CHF 73.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSU.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INSU.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to INSU.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check INSU.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs AUTD.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, AUTD.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while AUTD.SW trades at CHF 101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUTD.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUTD.SW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to AUTD.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check AUTD.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs 0P00015M0N.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, 0P00015M0N.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while 0P00015M0N.SW trades at CHF 135.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P00015M0N.SW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00015M0N.SW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is more volatile compared to 0P00015M0N.SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check 0P00015M0N.SW's competition here
CSBGC0.SW vs CASN.SW Comparison August 2025
CSBGC0.SW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSBGC0.SW stands at 499.7M. In comparison, CASN.SW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSBGC0.SW is priced at CHF 105.30, while CASN.SW trades at CHF 1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSBGC0.SW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASN.SW's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CSBGC0.SW's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSBGC0.SW is less volatile compared to CASN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSBGC0.SW.Check CASN.SW's competition here