Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel de La Touraine et du Poitou Société Coopérative
Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel de La Touraine et du Poitou Société Coopérative (CRTO.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRTO.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTO.PA | €127.76 | +0.66% | 127.8M | 12.14 | €10.52 | +2.51% |
| BNP.PA | €83.30 | -2.44% | 91.8B | 8.10 | €10.29 | +8.86% |
| ACA.PA | €16.37 | -1.30% | 49.5B | 7.51 | €2.18 | +6.72% |
| GLE.PA | €64.24 | -2.61% | 46.9B | 9.45 | €6.80 | +2.65% |
| KBC.BR | €108.70 | -1.05% | 43.1B | 12.49 | €8.70 | +2.67% |
| XBBDC.MC | €3.24 | -0.61% | 34.3B | 9.26 | €0.35 | +0.94% |
| A5G.IR | €8.94 | -1.16% | 19B | 9.61 | €0.93 | +5.26% |
| BIRG.IR | €15.70 | +0.58% | 14.9B | 13.65 | €1.15 | +3.38% |
| BCP.LS | €0.86 | -0.94% | 12.8B | 12.35 | €0.07 | +3.47% |
| VLK.AS | €58.90 | -0.34% | 2.5B | 16.97 | €3.47 | +7.05% |
Stock Comparison
CRTO.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while BNP.PA trades at €83.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check BNP.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while ACA.PA trades at €16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check ACA.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while GLE.PA trades at €64.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check GLE.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while KBC.BR trades at €108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check KBC.BR's competition here
CRTO.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while XBBDC.MC trades at €3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
CRTO.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while A5G.IR trades at €8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check A5G.IR's competition here
CRTO.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while BIRG.IR trades at €15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
CRTO.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while BCP.LS trades at €0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check BCP.LS's competition here
CRTO.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while VLK.AS trades at €58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check VLK.AS's competition here
CRTO.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
CRTO.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 905.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CAF.PA trades at €113.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CAF.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs MLCFM.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CRBP2.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 392.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CRBP2.PA trades at €27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CRBP2.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CNF.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 233M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CIV.PA trades at €104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CIV.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CMO.PA trades at €103.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CMO.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while BNB.BR trades at €396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check BNB.BR's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CRAV.PA trades at €129.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CAT31.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CAT31.PA trades at €113.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CAT31.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CCN.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CCN.PA trades at €134.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CCN.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CRLA.PA trades at €79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CRSU.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 119M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CRSU.PA trades at €200.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CRSU.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CRAP.PA trades at €139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while CRLO.PA trades at €93.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs MLGRC.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while MLGRC.PA trades at €23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is 74.38. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check MLGRC.PA's competition here
CRTO.PA vs DD7E.IR Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, DD7E.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while DD7E.IR trades at €23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas DD7E.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DD7E.IR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to DD7E.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check DD7E.IR's competition here
CRTO.PA vs KN.PA Comparison April 2026
CRTO.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTO.PA stands at 127.8M. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRTO.PA is priced at €127.76, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.14, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CRTO.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTO.PA is more volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTO.PA.Check KN.PA's competition here