Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel Sud Rhône Alpes
Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel Sud Rhône Alpes (CRSU.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRSU.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRSU.PA | €174.60 | +0.00% | 109.5M | 8.41 | €20.76 | +3.44% |
| BNP.PA | €78.38 | -0.15% | 87.6B | 8.31 | €9.43 | +6.11% |
| ACA.PA | €16.08 | +0.16% | 48.6B | 6.90 | €2.33 | +6.84% |
| GLE.PA | €55.00 | +0.36% | 37.9B | 9.21 | €5.97 | +1.98% |
| KBC.BR | €92.42 | +0.22% | 36.7B | 10.92 | €8.46 | +3.68% |
| XBBDC.MC | €2.48 | +0.00% | 24.9B | 8.55 | €0.29 | +7.74% |
| A5G.IR | €6.58 | -0.23% | 14.1B | 7.08 | €0.93 | +5.62% |
| BIRG.IR | €11.78 | +0.04% | 11.3B | 9.89 | €1.19 | +5.35% |
| BCP.LS | €0.73 | -1.14% | 11B | 24.33 | €0.03 | +4.11% |
| VLK.AS | €56.50 | -0.53% | 2.4B | 18.23 | €3.10 | +7.35% |
Stock Comparison
CRSU.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while BNP.PA trades at €78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check BNP.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while ACA.PA trades at €16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check ACA.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while GLE.PA trades at €55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check GLE.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while KBC.BR trades at €92.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check KBC.BR's competition here
CRSU.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while XBBDC.MC trades at €2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
CRSU.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while A5G.IR trades at €6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check A5G.IR's competition here
CRSU.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while BIRG.IR trades at €11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
CRSU.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while BCP.LS trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check BCP.LS's competition here
CRSU.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while VLK.AS trades at €56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check VLK.AS's competition here
CRSU.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
CRSU.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
CRSU.PA vs MLCFM.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 830.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA and MLCFM.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 667.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CAF.PA trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CAF.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CRBP2.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CRBP2.PA trades at €23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CRBP2.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CNF.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CIV.PA trades at €91.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CIV.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CRAV.PA trades at €123.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while BNB.BR trades at €390.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check BNB.BR's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CMO.PA trades at €92.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CMO.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CAT31.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CAT31.PA trades at €97.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CAT31.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CRLA.PA trades at €69.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CCN.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CCN.PA has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CCN.PA trades at €111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CCN.PA's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CCN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CCN.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CRTO.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CRTO.PA trades at €112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CRTO.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CRLO.PA trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while CRAP.PA trades at €112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs MLGRC.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while MLGRC.PA trades at €15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA and MLGRC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLGRC.PA's competition here
CRSU.PA vs KN.PA Comparison August 2025
CRSU.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSU.PA stands at 109.5M. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRSU.PA is priced at €174.60, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.41, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CRSU.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSU.PA is less volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSU.PA.Check KN.PA's competition here