Salesforce, Inc.
Salesforce, Inc. CRM.NE Peers
See (CRM.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM.NE | $22.78 | +0.22% | 386.28B | 44.67 | $0.51 | +0.56% |
| CSU.TO | $4,936.46 | -3.77% | 104.61B | 103.99 | $47.47 | +0.11% |
| CDAY.TO | $93.38 | +0.38% | 14.58B | 2334.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
| DSG.TO | $158.95 | +0.41% | 13.57B | 70.33 | $2.26 | N/A |
| OTEX.TO | $39.28 | +0.56% | 10.18B | 11.66 | $3.37 | +3.66% |
| KXS.TO | $201.35 | +2.12% | 5.66B | 197.40 | $1.02 | N/A |
| LSPD.TO | $15.02 | +2.32% | 2.30B | -13.53 | -$1.11 | N/A |
| MAGT.TO | $44.24 | N/A | 1.83B | 368.67 | $0.12 | N/A |
| ENGH.TO | $26.37 | +1.62% | 1.45B | 17.12 | $1.54 | +3.94% |
| DCBO.TO | $37.04 | +2.32% | 1.12B | 31.13 | $1.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRM.NE vs CSU.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, CSU.TO has a market cap of 104.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while CSU.TO trades at $4,936.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas CSU.TO's P/E ratio is 103.99. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSU.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to CSU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CDAY.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, CDAY.TO has a market cap of 14.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while CDAY.TO trades at $93.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas CDAY.TO's P/E ratio is 2334.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDAY.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to CDAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs DSG.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, DSG.TO has a market cap of 13.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while DSG.TO trades at $158.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas DSG.TO's P/E ratio is 70.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to DSG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs OTEX.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, OTEX.TO has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while OTEX.TO trades at $39.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas OTEX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OTEX.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to OTEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs KXS.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, KXS.TO has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while KXS.TO trades at $201.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas KXS.TO's P/E ratio is 197.40. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to KXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LSPD.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, LSPD.TO has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while LSPD.TO trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas LSPD.TO's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSPD.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to LSPD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs MAGT.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, MAGT.TO has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while MAGT.TO trades at $44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas MAGT.TO's P/E ratio is 368.67. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAGT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to MAGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ENGH.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, ENGH.TO has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while ENGH.TO trades at $26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas ENGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGH.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ENGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs DCBO.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, DCBO.TO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while DCBO.TO trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas DCBO.TO's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCBO.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to DCBO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ABST.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, ABST.TO has a market cap of 808.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while ABST.TO trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas ABST.TO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABST.TO's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to ABST.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CMG.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, CMG.TO has a market cap of 675.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while CMG.TO trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas CMG.TO's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMG.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to CMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs TCS.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, TCS.TO has a market cap of 644.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while TCS.TO trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas TCS.TO's P/E ratio is 217.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCS.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to TCS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BLN.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, BLN.TO has a market cap of 600.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while BLN.TO trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas BLN.TO's P/E ratio is -71.30. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLN.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to BLN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs REAL.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, REAL.TO has a market cap of 449.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while REAL.TO trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas REAL.TO's P/E ratio is 202.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REAL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to REAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ABXX.NE Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, ABXX.NE has a market cap of 334.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while ABXX.NE trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas ABXX.NE's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABXX.NE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ABXX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs QFOR.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, QFOR.TO has a market cap of 242.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while QFOR.TO trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas QFOR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QFOR.TO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to QFOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs WNDR.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, WNDR.TO has a market cap of 228.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while WNDR.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas WNDR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WNDR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to WNDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SYZ.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, SYZ.TO has a market cap of 214.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while SYZ.TO trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas SYZ.TO's P/E ratio is -306.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYZ.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to SYZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs THNC.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, THNC.TO has a market cap of 174.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while THNC.TO trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas THNC.TO's P/E ratio is 85.67. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THNC.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to THNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs EINC.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, EINC.TO has a market cap of 163.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while EINC.TO trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas EINC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EINC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to EINC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs IMP.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, IMP.TO has a market cap of 146.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while IMP.TO trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas IMP.TO's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMP.TO's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to IMP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs URL.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, URL.CN has a market cap of 92.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while URL.CN trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas URL.CN's P/E ratio is 103.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to URL.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to URL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs XTRA.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, XTRA.TO has a market cap of 84.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while XTRA.TO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas XTRA.TO's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XTRA.TO's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to XTRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs MVP.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, MVP.TO has a market cap of 74.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while MVP.TO trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas MVP.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MVP.TO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to MVP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs AXCP.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, AXCP.CN has a market cap of 36.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while AXCP.CN trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas AXCP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXCP.CN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to AXCP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LGIQ.NE Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, LGIQ.NE has a market cap of 34.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while LGIQ.NE trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas LGIQ.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGIQ.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to LGIQ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs TWOH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, TWOH.CN has a market cap of 27.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while TWOH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas TWOH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWOH.CN's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to TWOH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BLOX.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, BLOX.CN has a market cap of 21.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while BLOX.CN trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas BLOX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLOX.CN's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to BLOX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LSPK.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, LSPK.TO has a market cap of 18.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while LSPK.TO trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas LSPK.TO's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSPK.TO's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to LSPK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ADCO.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, ADCO.TO has a market cap of 17.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while ADCO.TO trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas ADCO.TO's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADCO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ADCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BNSL.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, BNSL.CN has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while BNSL.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas BNSL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNSL.CN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRM.NE has daily volatility of 1.44 and BNSL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRM.NE vs HP.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, HP.CN has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while HP.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas HP.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HP.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to HP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs FDGE.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, FDGE.TO has a market cap of 14.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while FDGE.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas FDGE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FDGE.TO's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to FDGE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs IGN.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, IGN.CN has a market cap of 12.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while IGN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas IGN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGN.CN's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to IGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SPO.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, SPO.CN has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while SPO.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas SPO.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to SPO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs VQS.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, VQS.TO has a market cap of 9.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while VQS.TO trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas VQS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VQS.TO's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to VQS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs TONY.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, TONY.CN has a market cap of 8.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while TONY.CN trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas TONY.CN's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TONY.CN's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to TONY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs EGTI.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, EGTI.CN has a market cap of 7.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while EGTI.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas EGTI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGTI.CN's ROE of +13.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to EGTI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs IAI.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, IAI.CN has a market cap of 5.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while IAI.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas IAI.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IAI.CN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to IAI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs VSBY.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, VSBY.CN has a market cap of 5.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while VSBY.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas VSBY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VSBY.CN's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to VSBY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BYFM.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, BYFM.CN has a market cap of 4.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while BYFM.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas BYFM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYFM.CN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to BYFM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs MWRK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, MWRK.CN has a market cap of 4.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while MWRK.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas MWRK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MWRK.CN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to MWRK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LIQD.NE Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, LIQD.NE has a market cap of 3.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while LIQD.NE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas LIQD.NE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIQD.NE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to LIQD.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ISFT.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, ISFT.CN has a market cap of 3.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while ISFT.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas ISFT.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISFT.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to ISFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LQID.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, LQID.CN has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while LQID.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas LQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LQID.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to LQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SKUR.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, SKUR.CN has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while SKUR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas SKUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKUR.CN's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to SKUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs GBMC.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, GBMC.CN has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while GBMC.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas GBMC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBMC.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to GBMC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs WFLD.V Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, WFLD.V has a market cap of 2.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while WFLD.V trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas WFLD.V's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFLD.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to WFLD.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs WHIP.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, WHIP.CN has a market cap of 2.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while WHIP.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas WHIP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHIP.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to WHIP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs KASH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, KASH.CN has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while KASH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas KASH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KASH.CN's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to KASH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs XRA.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, XRA.CN has a market cap of 2.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while XRA.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas XRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XRA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to XRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs GBLC.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, GBLC.CN has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while GBLC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas GBLC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLC.CN's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to GBLC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, CK.CN has a market cap of 1.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while CK.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas CK.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CK.CN's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to CK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LUXX.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, LUXX.CN has a market cap of 1.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while LUXX.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas LUXX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUXX.CN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to LUXX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs PLNK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, PLNK.CN has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while PLNK.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas PLNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLNK.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to PLNK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs EMPH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, EMPH.CN has a market cap of 1.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while EMPH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas EMPH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMPH.CN's ROE of +3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to EMPH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs PPK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, PPK.CN has a market cap of 827971.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while PPK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas PPK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPK.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to PPK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs FDM.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, FDM.CN has a market cap of 821051.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while FDM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas FDM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FDM.CN's ROE of +12.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to FDM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs PUSH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, PUSH.CN has a market cap of 808440.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while PUSH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas PUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUSH.CN's ROE of -10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRM.NE has daily volatility of 1.44 and PUSH.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRM.NE vs TTT.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, TTT.CN has a market cap of 763470.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while TTT.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas TTT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to TTT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SOLV.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, SOLV.CN has a market cap of 762665.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while SOLV.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas SOLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOLV.CN's ROE of -47.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to SOLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs GEMS.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, GEMS.CN has a market cap of 668958.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while GEMS.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas GEMS.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEMS.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to GEMS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs DVN.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, DVN.CN has a market cap of 604125.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while DVN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas DVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DVN.CN's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to DVN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ARWY.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, ARWY.CN has a market cap of 539148.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while ARWY.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas ARWY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARWY.CN's ROE of +5.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to ARWY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs XIGM.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, XIGM.CN has a market cap of 527063.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while XIGM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas XIGM.CN's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XIGM.CN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to XIGM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs RAD.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, RAD.CN has a market cap of 417573.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while RAD.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas RAD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAD.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to RAD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ZEU.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, ZEU.CN has a market cap of 410423.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while ZEU.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas ZEU.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZEU.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to ZEU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs COYX.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 386.28B. In comparison, COYX.CN has a market cap of 388425.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at $22.78, while COYX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.67, whereas COYX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COYX.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to COYX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.