Salesforce, Inc.
Salesforce, Inc. CRM.NE Peers
See (CRM.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM.NE | CA$20.63 | +0.19% | 336.8B | 40.35 | CA$0.51 | +0.62% |
| SHOP.TO | CA$169.07 | -3.03% | 228.1B | 104.64 | CA$1.68 | N/A |
| CSU.TO | CA$4,872.79 | -2.25% | 104.2B | 103.33 | CA$47.58 | +0.11% |
| CDAY.TO | CA$93.38 | +0.38% | 14.6B | 2334.50 | CA$0.04 | N/A |
| DSG.TO | CA$142.75 | -0.99% | 12.2B | 63.07 | CA$2.26 | N/A |
| OTEX.TO | CA$40.56 | +3.81% | 10.2B | 11.89 | CA$3.32 | +3.69% |
| KXS.TO | CA$199.23 | -1.00% | 5.7B | 437.76 | CA$0.46 | N/A |
| LSPD.TO | CA$17.97 | +4.29% | 2.4B | -2.95 | -CA$6.00 | N/A |
| MAGT.TO | CA$44.24 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 368.67 | CA$0.12 | N/A |
| ENGH.TO | CA$23.82 | +1.58% | 1.3B | 16.54 | CA$1.42 | +7.39% |
Stock Comparison
CRM.NE vs SHOP.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, SHOP.TO has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while SHOP.TO trades at CA$169.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas SHOP.TO's P/E ratio is 104.64. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHOP.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to SHOP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CSU.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, CSU.TO has a market cap of 104.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while CSU.TO trades at CA$4,872.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas CSU.TO's P/E ratio is 103.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSU.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to CSU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CDAY.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, CDAY.TO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while CDAY.TO trades at CA$93.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas CDAY.TO's P/E ratio is 2334.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDAY.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to CDAY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs DSG.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, DSG.TO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while DSG.TO trades at CA$142.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas DSG.TO's P/E ratio is 63.07. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to DSG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs OTEX.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, OTEX.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while OTEX.TO trades at CA$40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas OTEX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OTEX.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to OTEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs KXS.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, KXS.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while KXS.TO trades at CA$199.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas KXS.TO's P/E ratio is 437.76. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KXS.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to KXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LSPD.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LSPD.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LSPD.TO trades at CA$17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LSPD.TO's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSPD.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to LSPD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs MAGT.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, MAGT.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while MAGT.TO trades at CA$44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas MAGT.TO's P/E ratio is 368.67. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAGT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to MAGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ENGH.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, ENGH.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while ENGH.TO trades at CA$23.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas ENGH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGH.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ENGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs DCBO.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, DCBO.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while DCBO.TO trades at CA$43.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas DCBO.TO's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCBO.TO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to DCBO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ABST.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, ABST.TO has a market cap of 808M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while ABST.TO trades at CA$15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas ABST.TO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABST.TO's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to ABST.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CMG.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, CMG.TO has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while CMG.TO trades at CA$7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas CMG.TO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMG.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to CMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs TCS.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, TCS.TO has a market cap of 548.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while TCS.TO trades at CA$37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas TCS.TO's P/E ratio is 123.17. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to TCS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BLN.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, BLN.TO has a market cap of 548.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while BLN.TO trades at CA$6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas BLN.TO's P/E ratio is -72.22. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLN.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to BLN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ABXX.NE Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, ABXX.NE has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while ABXX.NE trades at CA$12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas ABXX.NE's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABXX.NE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ABXX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs REAL.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, REAL.TO has a market cap of 394.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while REAL.TO trades at CA$5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas REAL.TO's P/E ratio is 177.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REAL.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to REAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs QFOR.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, QFOR.TO has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while QFOR.TO trades at CA$6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas QFOR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QFOR.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to QFOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs WNDR.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, WNDR.TO has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while WNDR.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas WNDR.TO's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WNDR.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to WNDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SYZ.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, SYZ.TO has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while SYZ.TO trades at CA$9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas SYZ.TO's P/E ratio is -195.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYZ.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to SYZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs IMP.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, IMP.TO has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while IMP.TO trades at CA$3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas IMP.TO's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMP.TO's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to IMP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs EINC.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, EINC.TO has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while EINC.TO trades at CA$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas EINC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EINC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to EINC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs THNC.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, THNC.TO has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while THNC.TO trades at CA$2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas THNC.TO's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THNC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to THNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs URL.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, URL.CN has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while URL.CN trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas URL.CN's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to URL.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to URL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs XTRA.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, XTRA.TO has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while XTRA.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas XTRA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XTRA.TO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to XTRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs MVP.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, MVP.TO has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while MVP.TO trades at CA$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas MVP.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MVP.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to MVP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs TONY.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, TONY.CN has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while TONY.CN trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas TONY.CN's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TONY.CN's ROE of -3.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to TONY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs AXCP.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, AXCP.CN has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while AXCP.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas AXCP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXCP.CN's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to AXCP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LGIQ.NE Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LGIQ.NE has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LGIQ.NE trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LGIQ.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGIQ.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to LGIQ.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LUXX.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LUXX.CN has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LUXX.CN trades at CA$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LUXX.CN's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUXX.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to LUXX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs TWOH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, TWOH.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while TWOH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas TWOH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TWOH.CN's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to TWOH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BLOX.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, BLOX.CN has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while BLOX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas BLOX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLOX.CN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to BLOX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LSPK.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LSPK.TO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LSPK.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LSPK.TO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSPK.TO's ROE of -7.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to LSPK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ADCO.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, ADCO.TO has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while ADCO.TO trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas ADCO.TO's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADCO.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ADCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SKUR.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, SKUR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while SKUR.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas SKUR.CN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKUR.CN's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to SKUR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BNSL.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, BNSL.CN has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while BNSL.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas BNSL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNSL.CN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRM.NE has daily volatility of 1.21 and BNSL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRM.NE vs HP.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, HP.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while HP.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas HP.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HP.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to HP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs FDGE.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, FDGE.TO has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while FDGE.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas FDGE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FDGE.TO's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to FDGE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs IGN.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, IGN.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while IGN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas IGN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IGN.CN's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to IGN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs VQS.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, VQS.TO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while VQS.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas VQS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VQS.TO's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to VQS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SPO.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, SPO.CN has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while SPO.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas SPO.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to SPO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ISFT.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, ISFT.CN has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while ISFT.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas ISFT.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISFT.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ISFT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CNI.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, CNI.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while CNI.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas CNI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNI.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to CNI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs EGTI.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, EGTI.CN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while EGTI.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas EGTI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGTI.CN's ROE of +13.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to EGTI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs IAI.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, IAI.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while IAI.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas IAI.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IAI.CN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to IAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs BYFM.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, BYFM.CN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while BYFM.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas BYFM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BYFM.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to BYFM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs VSBY.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, VSBY.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while VSBY.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas VSBY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VSBY.CN's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to VSBY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs MWRK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, MWRK.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while MWRK.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas MWRK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MWRK.CN's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to MWRK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LIQD.NE Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LIQD.NE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LIQD.NE trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LIQD.NE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIQD.NE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to LIQD.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LQID.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LQID.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LQID.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LQID.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to LQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs GBMC.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, GBMC.CN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while GBMC.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas GBMC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBMC.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to GBMC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs WFLD.V Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, WFLD.V has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while WFLD.V trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas WFLD.V's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WFLD.V's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to WFLD.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs KASH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, KASH.CN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while KASH.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas KASH.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KASH.CN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to KASH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs CK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, CK.CN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while CK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas CK.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CK.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to CK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs XRA.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, XRA.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while XRA.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas XRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XRA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to XRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs GBLC.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, GBLC.CN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while GBLC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas GBLC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBLC.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to GBLC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs WHIP.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, WHIP.CN has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while WHIP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas WHIP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WHIP.CN's ROE of +73.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to WHIP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ARWY.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, ARWY.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while ARWY.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas ARWY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARWY.CN's ROE of +5.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to ARWY.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs EMPH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, EMPH.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while EMPH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas EMPH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMPH.CN's ROE of +3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to EMPH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs PLNK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, PLNK.CN has a market cap of 887K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while PLNK.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas PLNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLNK.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to PLNK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs PPK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, PPK.CN has a market cap of 828K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while PPK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas PPK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPK.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to PPK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs FDM.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, FDM.CN has a market cap of 821.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while FDM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas FDM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FDM.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to FDM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs PUSH.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, PUSH.CN has a market cap of 808.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while PUSH.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas PUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUSH.CN's ROE of -10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRM.NE has daily volatility of 1.21 and PUSH.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRM.NE vs TTT.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, TTT.CN has a market cap of 763.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while TTT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas TTT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to TTT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SOLV.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, SOLV.CN has a market cap of 762.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while SOLV.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas SOLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOLV.CN's ROE of -47.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to SOLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs GEMS.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, GEMS.CN has a market cap of 669K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while GEMS.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas GEMS.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEMS.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to GEMS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs XIGM.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, XIGM.CN has a market cap of 650.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while XIGM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas XIGM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XIGM.CN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to XIGM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs DVN.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, DVN.CN has a market cap of 604.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while DVN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas DVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DVN.CN's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to DVN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs ZEU.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, ZEU.CN has a market cap of 410.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while ZEU.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas ZEU.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZEU.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to ZEU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs COYX.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, COYX.CN has a market cap of 388.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while COYX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas COYX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COYX.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to COYX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs RAD.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, RAD.CN has a market cap of 278.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while RAD.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas RAD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAD.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to RAD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs VOYG.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, VOYG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while VOYG.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas VOYG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOYG.TO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to VOYG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs LNK.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LNK.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LNK.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNK.CN's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRM.NE has daily volatility of 1.21 and LNK.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRM.NE vs LWRK.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, LWRK.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while LWRK.TO trades at CA$32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas LWRK.TO's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LWRK.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to LWRK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs XCT.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, XCT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while XCT.TO trades at CA$3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas XCT.TO's P/E ratio is -55.36. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XCT.TO's ROE of +20.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to XCT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs SWIS.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, SWIS.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while SWIS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas SWIS.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWIS.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRM.NE has daily volatility of 1.21 and SWIS.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRM.NE vs NXJ.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, NXJ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while NXJ.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas NXJ.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NXJ.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is more volatile compared to NXJ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs PAT.TO Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, PAT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while PAT.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas PAT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAT.TO's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM.NE is less volatile compared to PAT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.NE.
CRM.NE vs TSF.CN Comparison
CRM.NE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM.NE stands at 336.8B. In comparison, TSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRM.NE is priced at CA$20.63, while TSF.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 40.35, whereas TSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CRM.NE's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSF.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRM.NE has daily volatility of 1.21 and TSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.