China Resources Beer (Holdings) Company Limited
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Company Limited CRHKF Peers
See (CRHKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRHKF | $5.72 | +54.18% | 18.6B | 28.60 | $0.20 | +1.14% |
| BUDFF | $71.28 | -0.14% | 141.4B | 20.96 | $3.40 | +1.59% |
| HINKF | $89.23 | -1.43% | 50.4B | 44.84 | $1.99 | +2.69% |
| HEINY | $43.67 | -3.00% | 49.2B | 44.11 | $0.99 | +2.61% |
| CABHF | $171.73 | +41.93% | 21.7B | 23.88 | $7.19 | +2.35% |
| HKHHY | $37.88 | -2.75% | 21.3B | 37.50 | $1.01 | +3.17% |
| ASBRF | $14.00 | +12.00% | 21B | 16.09 | $0.87 | +0.02% |
| HKHHF | $76.50 | -5.38% | 20.8B | 37.50 | $2.04 | +3.14% |
| FMXUF | $9.80 | -9.18% | 20.2B | 21.78 | $0.45 | +0.26% |
| CABGY | $27.95 | -2.17% | 19B | 17.58 | $1.59 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
CRHKF vs BUDFF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BUDFF has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while BUDFF trades at $71.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas BUDFF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BUDFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to BUDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs HINKF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HINKF has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while HINKF trades at $89.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas HINKF's P/E ratio is 44.84. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HINKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and HINKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs HEINY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HEINY has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while HEINY trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas HEINY's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEINY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to HEINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs CABHF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CABHF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while CABHF trades at $171.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas CABHF's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CABHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to CABHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs HKHHY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HKHHY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while HKHHY trades at $37.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas HKHHY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HKHHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to HKHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs ASBRF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ASBRF has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while ASBRF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas ASBRF's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASBRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and ASBRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs HKHHF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HKHHF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while HKHHF trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas HKHHF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HKHHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and HKHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs FMXUF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FMXUF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while FMXUF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas FMXUF's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FMXUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and FMXUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs CABGY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CABGY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while CABGY trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas CABGY's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CABGY's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to CABGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs CABJF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CABJF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while CABJF trades at $138.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas CABJF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CABJF's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to CABJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs BDWBF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BDWBF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while BDWBF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas BDWBF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDWBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to BDWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs MXGBF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MXGBF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while MXGBF trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas MXGBF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MXGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and MXGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs KNBWY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, KNBWY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while KNBWY trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas KNBWY's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNBWY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to KNBWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs TSGTY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, TSGTY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while TSGTY trades at $32.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas TSGTY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSGTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and TSGTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs TSGTF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, TSGTF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while TSGTF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas TSGTF's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSGTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and TSGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs KNBWF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, KNBWF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while KNBWF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas KNBWF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KNBWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and KNBWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs CRHKY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CRHKY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while CRHKY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas CRHKY's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRHKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to CRHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs STBFY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, STBFY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while STBFY trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas STBFY's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STBFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to STBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs STBFF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, STBFF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while STBFF trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas STBFF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to STBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs BDWBY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BDWBY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while BDWBY trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas BDWBY's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDWBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and BDWBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs ROYUF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ROYUF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while ROYUF trades at $65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas ROYUF's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROYUF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to ROYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs SOOBF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SOOBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while SOOBF trades at $40.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas SOOBF's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOOBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and SOOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs AEBZY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, AEBZY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while AEBZY trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas AEBZY's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEBZY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and AEBZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs CCGPY Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CCGPY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while CCGPY trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas CCGPY's P/E ratio is 46.33. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCGPY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and CCGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs UMLGF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, UMLGF has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while UMLGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas UMLGF's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UMLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to UMLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs CGPZF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CGPZF has a market cap of 798.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while CGPZF trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas CGPZF's P/E ratio is 54.75. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to CGPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs BIBLF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BIBLF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while BIBLF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas BIBLF's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIBLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and BIBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs SMGLF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SMGLF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while SMGLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas SMGLF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMGLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to SMGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.
CRHKF vs BRBMF Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BRBMF has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while BRBMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas BRBMF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BRBMF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and BRBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs HVCW Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HVCW has a market cap of 770.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while HVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas HVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HVCW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and HVCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs SIPC Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SIPC has a market cap of 378.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while SIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas SIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIPC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and SIPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs EARI Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, EARI has a market cap of 338.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while EARI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas EARI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EARI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and EARI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs MENB Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MENB has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while MENB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas MENB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MENB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and MENB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs MRIB Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MRIB has a market cap of 179. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while MRIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas MRIB's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRIB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF and MRIB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRHKF vs GBEN Comparison
CRHKF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRHKF stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GBEN has a market cap of 7. Regarding current trading prices, CRHKF is priced at $5.72, while GBEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRHKF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.60, whereas GBEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRHKF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBEN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRHKF is less volatile compared to GBEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRHKF.