Captain Polyplast Limited
Captain Polyplast Limited (CPL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Miscellaneous Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPL.BO | ₹72.00 | +0.83% | 4.3B | 12.45 | ₹5.81 | N/A |
| HAWKINCOOK.BO | ₹7,250.05 | -0.02% | 38.1B | 30.26 | ₹237.84 | +1.81% |
| MORGANITE.BO | ₹1,310.00 | -3.69% | 7.4B | 29.43 | ₹45.19 | +3.68% |
| SHISHIND.BO | ₹14.17 | -3.87% | 5.5B | -16.42 | -₹0.88 | N/A |
| PODARPIGQ.BO | ₹378.85 | -1.76% | 4B | 22.23 | ₹17.04 | N/A |
| DHABRIYA.BO | ₹360.00 | -0.83% | 3.9B | 14.52 | ₹25.12 | +0.19% |
| KISAN.BO | ₹30.00 | +8.62% | 3.2B | -88.50 | -₹0.30 | N/A |
| FLUIDOM.BO | ₹576.95 | +1.10% | 2.9B | 13.66 | ₹42.45 | +1.29% |
| SIZEMASTER.BO | ₹268.95 | +0.00% | 2.7B | 84.64 | ₹3.19 | N/A |
| INDAG.BO | ₹100.00 | +3.63% | 2.5B | 41.53 | ₹2.32 | +2.49% |
Stock Comparison
CPL.BO vs HAWKINCOOK.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HAWKINCOOK.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while HAWKINCOOK.BO trades at ₹7,250.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas HAWKINCOOK.BO's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to HAWKINCOOK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check HAWKINCOOK.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs MORGANITE.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MORGANITE.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while MORGANITE.BO trades at ₹1,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MORGANITE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MORGANITE.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to MORGANITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check MORGANITE.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs SHISHIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHISHIND.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while SHISHIND.BO trades at ₹14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SHISHIND.BO's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHISHIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHISHIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check SHISHIND.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs PODARPIGQ.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PODARPIGQ.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while PODARPIGQ.BO trades at ₹378.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PODARPIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PODARPIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to PODARPIGQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check PODARPIGQ.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs DHABRIYA.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DHABRIYA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while DHABRIYA.BO trades at ₹360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas DHABRIYA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DHABRIYA.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to DHABRIYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check DHABRIYA.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs KISAN.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KISAN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while KISAN.BO trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KISAN.BO's P/E ratio is -88.50. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KISAN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to KISAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check KISAN.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs FLUIDOM.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FLUIDOM.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while FLUIDOM.BO trades at ₹576.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas FLUIDOM.BO's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLUIDOM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to FLUIDOM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check FLUIDOM.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs SIZEMASTER.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SIZEMASTER.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while SIZEMASTER.BO trades at ₹268.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SIZEMASTER.BO's P/E ratio is 84.64. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIZEMASTER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to SIZEMASTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check SIZEMASTER.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs INDAG.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INDAG.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while INDAG.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas INDAG.BO's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INDAG.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to INDAG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check INDAG.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs KAKA.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KAKA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while KAKA.BO trades at ₹182.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KAKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAKA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to KAKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check KAKA.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs SIGNETIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SIGNETIND.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while SIGNETIND.BO trades at ₹71.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SIGNETIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIGNETIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to SIGNETIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check SIGNETIND.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs DHPIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DHPIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while DHPIND.BO trades at ₹495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas DHPIND.BO's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DHPIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check DHPIND.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs CAPPIPES.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CAPPIPES.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while CAPPIPES.BO trades at ₹9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas CAPPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAPPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to CAPPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check CAPPIPES.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs APTPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, APTPACK.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while APTPACK.BO trades at ₹125.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas APTPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 152.66. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APTPACK.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to APTPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check APTPACK.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs MITSU.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MITSU.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while MITSU.BO trades at ₹104.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MITSU.BO's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MITSU.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to MITSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check MITSU.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs SOMICONV.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SOMICONV.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while SOMICONV.BO trades at ₹97.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SOMICONV.BO's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SOMICONV.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to SOMICONV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check SOMICONV.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs GENESIS.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GENESIS.BO has a market cap of 969.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while GENESIS.BO trades at ₹70.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas GENESIS.BO's P/E ratio is -438.65. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GENESIS.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to GENESIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check GENESIS.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs ALKOSIGN.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALKOSIGN.BO has a market cap of 733.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while ALKOSIGN.BO trades at ₹68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas ALKOSIGN.BO's P/E ratio is 78.16. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALKOSIGN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to ALKOSIGN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check ALKOSIGN.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs DUTRON.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DUTRON.BO has a market cap of 666M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while DUTRON.BO trades at ₹112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas DUTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUTRON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to DUTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check DUTRON.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs NATPLAS.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NATPLAS.BO has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while NATPLAS.BO trades at ₹48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas NATPLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NATPLAS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to NATPLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check NATPLAS.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs RASIELEC.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RASIELEC.BO has a market cap of 414.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while RASIELEC.BO trades at ₹13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas RASIELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RASIELEC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to RASIELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check RASIELEC.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs PANKAJPO.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PANKAJPO.BO has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while PANKAJPO.BO trades at ₹59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas PANKAJPO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PANKAJPO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to PANKAJPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check PANKAJPO.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs ALFAICA.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ALFAICA.BO has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while ALFAICA.BO trades at ₹80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas ALFAICA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALFAICA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to ALFAICA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check ALFAICA.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs RAMGOPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RAMGOPOLY.BO has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while RAMGOPOLY.BO trades at ₹18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas RAMGOPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -203.30. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMGOPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check RAMGOPOLY.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs MAHACORP.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MAHACORP.BO has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while MAHACORP.BO trades at ₹0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MAHACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAHACORP.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to MAHACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check MAHACORP.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs COMMAND.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, COMMAND.BO has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while COMMAND.BO trades at ₹24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas COMMAND.BO's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COMMAND.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to COMMAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check COMMAND.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs SONALAD.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SONALAD.BO has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while SONALAD.BO trades at ₹35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SONALAD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SONALAD.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to SONALAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check SONALAD.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs IYKOTHITE.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IYKOTHITE.BO has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while IYKOTHITE.BO trades at ₹11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas IYKOTHITE.BO's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IYKOTHITE.BO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to IYKOTHITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check IYKOTHITE.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs VAMSHIRU.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VAMSHIRU.BO has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while VAMSHIRU.BO trades at ₹41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas VAMSHIRU.BO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VAMSHIRU.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to VAMSHIRU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check VAMSHIRU.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs NIRAJISPAT.NS Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NIRAJISPAT.NS has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while NIRAJISPAT.NS trades at ₹286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas NIRAJISPAT.NS's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIRAJISPAT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to NIRAJISPAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check NIRAJISPAT.NS's competition here
CPL.BO vs KUNSTOFF.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KUNSTOFF.BO has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while KUNSTOFF.BO trades at ₹23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KUNSTOFF.BO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KUNSTOFF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to KUNSTOFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check KUNSTOFF.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs KKPLASTICK.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KKPLASTICK.BO has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while KKPLASTICK.BO trades at ₹29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas KKPLASTICK.BO's P/E ratio is 283.50. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKPLASTICK.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to KKPLASTICK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check KKPLASTICK.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs POLYCON.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, POLYCON.BO has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while POLYCON.BO trades at ₹25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas POLYCON.BO's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POLYCON.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check POLYCON.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs ASHISHPO.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ASHISHPO.BO has a market cap of 111.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while ASHISHPO.BO trades at ₹30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas ASHISHPO.BO's P/E ratio is 149.55. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ASHISHPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASHISHPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check ASHISHPO.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs MILESTONE.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MILESTONE.BO has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while MILESTONE.BO trades at ₹18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas MILESTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MILESTONE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to MILESTONE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check MILESTONE.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs NARMP.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NARMP.BO has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while NARMP.BO trades at ₹23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas NARMP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NARMP.BO's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to NARMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check NARMP.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs SHGANEL.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHGANEL.BO has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while SHGANEL.BO trades at ₹13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas SHGANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHGANEL.BO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHGANEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check SHGANEL.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs ARCEEIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ARCEEIN.BO has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while ARCEEIN.BO trades at ₹14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas ARCEEIN.BO's P/E ratio is -39.27. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCEEIN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is more volatile compared to ARCEEIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check ARCEEIN.BO's competition here
CPL.BO vs INNOCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
CPL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPL.BO stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INNOCORP.BO has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CPL.BO is priced at ₹72.00, while INNOCORP.BO trades at ₹4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.45, whereas INNOCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, CPL.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INNOCORP.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CPL.BO is less volatile compared to INNOCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPL.BO.Check INNOCORP.BO's competition here