Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, WMT has a market cap of 913.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while WMT trades at $113.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas WMT's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to WMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check WMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while TGT trades at $123.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TGT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while DG trades at $107.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while DLTR trades at $110.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLTR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DLTR's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while FIVE trades at $221.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 35.02. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check FIVE's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while BJ trades at $87.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BJ's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while PSMT trades at $173.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check PSMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while OLLI trades at $79.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check OLLI's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while TBBB trades at $39.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is -23.95. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TBBB's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TBBB's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BIG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 419.7B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $950.71, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 49.23, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TUEM's competition here