Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, WMT has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while WMT trades at $132.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas WMT's P/E ratio is 48.69. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to WMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check WMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while TGT trades at $122.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TGT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while DG trades at $104.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while DLTR trades at $89.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DLTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DLTR's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while BJ trades at $96.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BJ's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while PSMT trades at $159.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check PSMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while OLLI trades at $78.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check OLLI's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while TBBB trades at $36.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TBBB's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TBBB's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BIG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 462B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $1,049.73, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.20, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TUEM's competition here