Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, WMT has a market cap of 906.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while WMT trades at $113.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas WMT's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to WMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check WMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while TGT trades at $135.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TGT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while DG trades at $118.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while DLTR trades at $124.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLTR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DLTR's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while BJ trades at $88.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BJ's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while FIVE trades at $189.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check FIVE's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while PSMT trades at $196.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check PSMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while TBBB trades at $42.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TBBB's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TBBB's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while OLLI trades at $64.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check OLLI's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BIG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 406.3B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $916.25, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 46.46, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TUEM's competition here