Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, WMT has a market cap of 753.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while WMT trades at $94.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas WMT's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to WMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while TGT trades at $95.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while DG trades at $111.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while DLTR trades at $95.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLTR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while BJ trades at $110.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while OLLI trades at $114.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while TBBB trades at $26.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is 124.48. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TBBB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while PSMT trades at $105.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BIG's ROE of -6.73%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 439.2B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $990.28, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 56.23, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.