Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while TGT trades at $115.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TGT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while DG trades at $153.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while DLTR trades at $131.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DLTR's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DLTR's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while BJ trades at $98.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BJ's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while OLLI trades at $107.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check OLLI's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while PSMT trades at $155.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check PSMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while TBBB trades at $36.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is -38.55. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TBBB's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TBBB's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BIG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 441.5B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $998.43, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.42, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TUEM's competition here