Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, WMT has a market cap of 786B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while WMT trades at $98.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas WMT's P/E ratio is 42.09. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to WMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check WMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while TGT trades at $99.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TGT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while DLTR trades at $114.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLTR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DLTR's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while DG trades at $108.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while BJ trades at $109.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BJ's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while OLLI trades at $138.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 42.47. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check OLLI's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while PSMT trades at $109.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check PSMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while TBBB trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is 121.33. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TBBB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TBBB's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BIG's ROE of -6.73%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BIG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 422.4B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $952.52, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 54.06, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TUEM's competition here