Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, WMT has a market cap of 766.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while WMT trades at $96.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas WMT's P/E ratio is 36.26. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to WMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check WMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while TGT trades at $97.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TGT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while DG trades at $112.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while DLTR trades at $111.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DLTR's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DLTR's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while BJ trades at $95.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BJ's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while OLLI trades at $130.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 40.05. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check OLLI's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while PSMT trades at $108.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check PSMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while TBBB trades at $26.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is -260.50. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TBBB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TBBB's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BIG's ROE of +12.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BIG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 417.6B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $941.58, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 53.38, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TUEM's competition here