Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, WMT has a market cap of 965.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while WMT trades at $121.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas WMT's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to WMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check WMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, TGT has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while TGT trades at $114.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas TGT's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TGT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, DG has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while DG trades at $123.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas DG's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, DLTR has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while DLTR trades at $105.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas DLTR's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DLTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to DLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check DLTR's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, BJ has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while BJ trades at $96.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas BJ's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BJ's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BJ's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, OLLI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while OLLI trades at $101.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas OLLI's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OLLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to OLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check OLLI's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, PSMT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while PSMT trades at $142.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas PSMT's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PSMT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to PSMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check PSMT's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, TBBB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while TBBB trades at $32.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas TBBB's P/E ratio is -35.23. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TBBB's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to TBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TBBB's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, BIG has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while BIG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas BIG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is less volatile compared to BIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check BIG's competition here

COST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COST stands at 432.5B. In comparison, TUEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COST is priced at $974.78, while TUEM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COST currently has a P/E ratio of 50.69, whereas TUEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COST's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TUEM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COST is more volatile compared to TUEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COST.Check TUEM's competition here