Continental Petroleums Limited
Continental Petroleums Limited (CONTPTR.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CONTPTR.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTPTR.BO | ₹91.91 | -0.28% | 511.1M | 17.99 | ₹5.11 | N/A |
| RELIANCE.NS | ₹1,428.00 | +0.61% | 19.3T | 23.23 | ₹61.46 | +0.39% |
| RELIANCE.BO | ₹1,427.90 | +0.55% | 19.3T | 23.23 | ₹61.47 | +0.39% |
| IOC.NS | ₹176.46 | +1.54% | 2.5T | 6.80 | ₹25.95 | +4.53% |
| IOC.BO | ₹176.45 | +1.35% | 2.5T | 6.80 | ₹25.96 | +4.53% |
| BPCL.BO | ₹372.55 | +1.83% | 1.6T | 6.47 | ₹57.60 | +6.05% |
| BPCL.NS | ₹372.10 | +1.58% | 1.6T | 6.46 | ₹57.58 | +6.05% |
| HINDPETRO.BO | ₹438.55 | +1.72% | 933.2B | 6.06 | ₹72.35 | +3.53% |
| HINDPETRO.NS | ₹438.50 | +1.76% | 933.1B | 6.06 | ₹72.36 | +3.53% |
| PETRONET.NS | ₹306.45 | -0.07% | 459.7B | 12.65 | ₹24.23 | +3.26% |
Stock Comparison
CONTPTR.BO vs RELIANCE.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, RELIANCE.NS has a market cap of 19.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while RELIANCE.NS trades at ₹1,428.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas RELIANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELIANCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check RELIANCE.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs RELIANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, RELIANCE.BO has a market cap of 19.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while RELIANCE.BO trades at ₹1,427.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas RELIANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELIANCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to RELIANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check RELIANCE.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs IOC.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, IOC.NS has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while IOC.NS trades at ₹176.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas IOC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to IOC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check IOC.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs IOC.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, IOC.BO has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while IOC.BO trades at ₹176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas IOC.BO's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to IOC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check IOC.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs BPCL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, BPCL.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while BPCL.BO trades at ₹372.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPCL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to BPCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check BPCL.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs BPCL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, BPCL.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while BPCL.NS trades at ₹372.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas BPCL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPCL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to BPCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check BPCL.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs HINDPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, HINDPETRO.BO has a market cap of 933.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while HINDPETRO.BO trades at ₹438.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HINDPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check HINDPETRO.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs HINDPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, HINDPETRO.NS has a market cap of 933.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while HINDPETRO.NS trades at ₹438.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas HINDPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to HINDPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check HINDPETRO.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs PETRONET.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, PETRONET.NS has a market cap of 459.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while PETRONET.NS trades at ₹306.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PETRONET.NS's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PETRONET.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to PETRONET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check PETRONET.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs PETRONET.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, PETRONET.BO has a market cap of 459.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while PETRONET.BO trades at ₹306.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PETRONET.BO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PETRONET.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to PETRONET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check PETRONET.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs MRPL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, MRPL.BO has a market cap of 338.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while MRPL.BO trades at ₹193.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MRPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to MRPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check MRPL.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs MRPL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, MRPL.NS has a market cap of 337B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while MRPL.NS trades at ₹192.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas MRPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to MRPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check MRPL.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs AEGISCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, AEGISCHEM.NS has a market cap of 277.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while AEGISCHEM.NS trades at ₹789.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AEGISCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 48.70. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEGISCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is less volatile compared to AEGISCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check AEGISCHEM.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs AEGISLOG.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, AEGISLOG.NS has a market cap of 246.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while AEGISLOG.NS trades at ₹702.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas AEGISLOG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEGISLOG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to AEGISLOG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check AEGISLOG.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs CASTROLIND.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, CASTROLIND.NS has a market cap of 185.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while CASTROLIND.NS trades at ₹187.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CASTROLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASTROLIND.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check CASTROLIND.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs CASTROLIND.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, CASTROLIND.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while CASTROLIND.BO trades at ₹187.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CASTROLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASTROLIND.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to CASTROLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check CASTROLIND.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs CHENNPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.BO has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while CHENNPETRO.BO trades at ₹884.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CHENNPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHENNPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check CHENNPETRO.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs CHENNPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, CHENNPETRO.NS has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while CHENNPETRO.NS trades at ₹884.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CHENNPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHENNPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to CHENNPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check CHENNPETRO.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs PANAMAPET.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, PANAMAPET.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while PANAMAPET.BO trades at ₹280.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PANAMAPET.BO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PANAMAPET.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to PANAMAPET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check PANAMAPET.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs PANAMAPET.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, PANAMAPET.NS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while PANAMAPET.NS trades at ₹280.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PANAMAPET.NS's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PANAMAPET.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to PANAMAPET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check PANAMAPET.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs GANDHAR.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, GANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while GANDHAR.BO trades at ₹143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check GANDHAR.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs GANDHAR.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, GANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while GANDHAR.NS trades at ₹142.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to GANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check GANDHAR.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs CONFIPET.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, CONFIPET.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while CONFIPET.BO trades at ₹32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CONFIPET.BO's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CONFIPET.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to CONFIPET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check CONFIPET.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs CONFIPET.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, CONFIPET.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while CONFIPET.NS trades at ₹31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas CONFIPET.NS's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CONFIPET.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to CONFIPET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check CONFIPET.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs GULFPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, GULFPETRO.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while GULFPETRO.NS trades at ₹32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GULFPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GULFPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is less volatile compared to GULFPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check GULFPETRO.NS's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs GULFPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, GULFPETRO.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while GULFPETRO.BO trades at ₹32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas GULFPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GULFPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to GULFPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check GULFPETRO.BO's competition here
CONTPTR.BO vs PROGREXV.BO Comparison February 2026
CONTPTR.BO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTPTR.BO stands at 511.1M. In comparison, PROGREXV.BO has a market cap of 96.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONTPTR.BO is priced at ₹91.91, while PROGREXV.BO trades at ₹26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTPTR.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.99, whereas PROGREXV.BO's P/E ratio is -2684.00. In terms of profitability, CONTPTR.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PROGREXV.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTPTR.BO is more volatile compared to PROGREXV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTPTR.BO.Check PROGREXV.BO's competition here