Consolidated Finvest & Holdings Limited
Consolidated Finvest & Holdings Limited (CONSOFINVT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CONSOFINVT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONSOFINVT.NS | ₹240.00 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 11.66 | ₹20.59 | +0.47% |
| MOTILALOFS.NS | ₹767.90 | -0.18% | 458.8B | 23.22 | ₹32.87 | +0.78% |
| MOTILALOFS.BO | ₹768.70 | +0.03% | 458.6B | 23.24 | ₹32.82 | +0.78% |
| AIIL.NS | ₹507.70 | +0.34% | 426.7B | 11.74 | ₹42.81 | +0.30% |
| ISEC.BO | ₹897.45 | +0.20% | 291.8B | 13.96 | ₹64.31 | N/A |
| ISEC.NS | ₹892.25 | -0.44% | 290.1B | 13.87 | ₹64.35 | N/A |
| CDSL.NS | ₹1,320.30 | -0.01% | 278.9B | 58.42 | ₹22.84 | +0.95% |
| ANGELONE.NS | ₹2,509.60 | +0.53% | 226.4B | 30.45 | ₹81.81 | +2.40% |
| ANGELONE.BO | ₹2,509.10 | +0.45% | 226.3B | 30.44 | ₹81.80 | +2.40% |
| CHOICEIN.BO | ₹798.40 | -0.94% | 164.7B | 71.01 | ₹10.80 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CONSOFINVT.NS vs MOTILALOFS.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MOTILALOFS.NS has a market cap of 458.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while MOTILALOFS.NS trades at ₹767.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MOTILALOFS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOTILALOFS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to MOTILALOFS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check MOTILALOFS.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs MOTILALOFS.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MOTILALOFS.BO has a market cap of 458.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while MOTILALOFS.BO trades at ₹768.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MOTILALOFS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOTILALOFS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to MOTILALOFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check MOTILALOFS.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AIIL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AIIL.NS has a market cap of 426.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AIIL.NS trades at ₹507.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to AIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AIIL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ISEC.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ISEC.BO has a market cap of 291.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ISEC.BO trades at ₹897.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ISEC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISEC.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to ISEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ISEC.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ISEC.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ISEC.NS has a market cap of 290.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ISEC.NS trades at ₹892.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ISEC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISEC.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to ISEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ISEC.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs CDSL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CDSL.NS has a market cap of 278.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while CDSL.NS trades at ₹1,320.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas CDSL.NS's P/E ratio is 58.42. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDSL.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to CDSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check CDSL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ANGELONE.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ANGELONE.NS has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ANGELONE.NS trades at ₹2,509.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ANGELONE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGELONE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to ANGELONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ANGELONE.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ANGELONE.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ANGELONE.BO has a market cap of 226.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ANGELONE.BO trades at ₹2,509.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ANGELONE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGELONE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to ANGELONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ANGELONE.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs CHOICEIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CHOICEIN.BO has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while CHOICEIN.BO trades at ₹798.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas CHOICEIN.BO's P/E ratio is 71.01. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHOICEIN.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to CHOICEIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check CHOICEIN.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs CHOICEIN.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CHOICEIN.NS has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while CHOICEIN.NS trades at ₹797.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas CHOICEIN.NS's P/E ratio is 70.66. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHOICEIN.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to CHOICEIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check CHOICEIN.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs JMFINANCIL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.NS has a market cap of 128.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while JMFINANCIL.NS trades at ₹138.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas JMFINANCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMFINANCIL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check JMFINANCIL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs JMFINANCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, JMFINANCIL.BO has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while JMFINANCIL.BO trades at ₹138.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas JMFINANCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMFINANCIL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to JMFINANCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check JMFINANCIL.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs EDELWEISS.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, EDELWEISS.BO has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while EDELWEISS.BO trades at ₹122.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas EDELWEISS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDELWEISS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to EDELWEISS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check EDELWEISS.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs EDELWEISS.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, EDELWEISS.NS has a market cap of 116.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while EDELWEISS.NS trades at ₹122.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas EDELWEISS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EDELWEISS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to EDELWEISS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check EDELWEISS.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs IEX.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IEX.NS has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while IEX.NS trades at ₹123.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas IEX.NS's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IEX.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to IEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check IEX.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs IEX.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IEX.BO has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while IEX.BO trades at ₹123.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas IEX.BO's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IEX.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to IEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check IEX.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs IIFLCAPS.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IIFLCAPS.BO has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while IIFLCAPS.BO trades at ₹314.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas IIFLCAPS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIFLCAPS.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to IIFLCAPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check IIFLCAPS.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs IIFLCAPS.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IIFLCAPS.NS has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while IIFLCAPS.NS trades at ₹314.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas IIFLCAPS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIFLCAPS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to IIFLCAPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check IIFLCAPS.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs IIFLSEC.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IIFLSEC.NS has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while IIFLSEC.NS trades at ₹231.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas IIFLSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIFLSEC.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to IIFLSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check IIFLSEC.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs IIFLSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IIFLSEC.BO has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while IIFLSEC.BO trades at ₹230.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas IIFLSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IIFLSEC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to IIFLSEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check IIFLSEC.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs RELIGARE.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, RELIGARE.NS has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while RELIGARE.NS trades at ₹220.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas RELIGARE.NS's P/E ratio is 69.04. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RELIGARE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to RELIGARE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check RELIGARE.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs TATAINVEST.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while TATAINVEST.NS trades at ₹692.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas TATAINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 85.38. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TATAINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to TATAINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check TATAINVEST.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs TATAINVEST.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while TATAINVEST.BO trades at ₹694.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas TATAINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 85.44. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TATAINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to TATAINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check TATAINVEST.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DHANI.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DHANI.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DHANI.NS trades at ₹51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DHANI.NS's P/E ratio is 86.54. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHANI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to DHANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DHANI.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs INDOTHAI.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INDOTHAI.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while INDOTHAI.NS trades at ₹259.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas INDOTHAI.NS's P/E ratio is 85.72. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOTHAI.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTHAI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check INDOTHAI.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs INDOTHAI.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INDOTHAI.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while INDOTHAI.BO trades at ₹259.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas INDOTHAI.BO's P/E ratio is 85.80. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOTHAI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to INDOTHAI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check INDOTHAI.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SHAREINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SHAREINDIA.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SHAREINDIA.BO trades at ₹140.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SHAREINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHAREINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to SHAREINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SHAREINDIA.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SHAREINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SHAREINDIA.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SHAREINDIA.NS trades at ₹140.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SHAREINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHAREINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to SHAREINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SHAREINDIA.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs MONARCH.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MONARCH.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while MONARCH.NS trades at ₹288.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MONARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MONARCH.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to MONARCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check MONARCH.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs MONARCH.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MONARCH.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while MONARCH.BO trades at ₹288.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MONARCH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MONARCH.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to MONARCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check MONARCH.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SGFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SGFIN.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SGFIN.NS trades at ₹399.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to SGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SGFIN.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SUMMITSEC.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SUMMITSEC.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SUMMITSEC.BO trades at ₹1,733.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SUMMITSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMMITSEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to SUMMITSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SUMMITSEC.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SUMMITSEC.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SUMMITSEC.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SUMMITSEC.NS trades at ₹1,742.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SUMMITSEC.NS's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMMITSEC.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to SUMMITSEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SUMMITSEC.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs GEOJITFSL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GEOJITFSL.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while GEOJITFSL.BO trades at ₹67.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GEOJITFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEOJITFSL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to GEOJITFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check GEOJITFSL.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs GEOJITFSL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GEOJITFSL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while GEOJITFSL.NS trades at ₹67.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GEOJITFSL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEOJITFSL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to GEOJITFSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check GEOJITFSL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ALGOQUANT.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ALGOQUANT.BO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ALGOQUANT.BO trades at ₹58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ALGOQUANT.BO's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALGOQUANT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to ALGOQUANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ALGOQUANT.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs PNBGILTS.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PNBGILTS.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while PNBGILTS.NS trades at ₹79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas PNBGILTS.NS's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNBGILTS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to PNBGILTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check PNBGILTS.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs PNBGILTS.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PNBGILTS.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while PNBGILTS.BO trades at ₹79.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas PNBGILTS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNBGILTS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to PNBGILTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check PNBGILTS.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DOLATALGO.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DOLATALGO.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DOLATALGO.BO trades at ₹76.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DOLATALGO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOLATALGO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to DOLATALGO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DOLATALGO.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DOLATALGO.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DOLATALGO.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DOLATALGO.NS trades at ₹76.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DOLATALGO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOLATALGO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to DOLATALGO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DOLATALGO.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DAMCAPITAL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DAMCAPITAL.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DAMCAPITAL.NS trades at ₹168.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DAMCAPITAL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DAMCAPITAL.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to DAMCAPITAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DAMCAPITAL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs MASTERTR.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MASTERTR.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while MASTERTR.NS trades at ₹92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MASTERTR.NS's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MASTERTR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to MASTERTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check MASTERTR.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SYSTMTXC.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SYSTMTXC.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SYSTMTXC.NS trades at ₹78.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SYSTMTXC.NS's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYSTMTXC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to SYSTMTXC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SYSTMTXC.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AFSL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AFSL.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AFSL.BO trades at ₹201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFSL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to AFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AFSL.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AFSL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AFSL.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AFSL.NS trades at ₹201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AFSL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFSL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to AFSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AFSL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs WEALTH.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WEALTH.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while WEALTH.NS trades at ₹951.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas WEALTH.NS's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WEALTH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to WEALTH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check WEALTH.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs 5PAISA.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5PAISA.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while 5PAISA.NS trades at ₹313.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas 5PAISA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5PAISA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to 5PAISA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check 5PAISA.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs 5PAISA.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, 5PAISA.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while 5PAISA.BO trades at ₹314.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas 5PAISA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 5PAISA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to 5PAISA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check 5PAISA.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs PRIMESECU.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PRIMESECU.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while PRIMESECU.NS trades at ₹277.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas PRIMESECU.NS's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRIMESECU.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMESECU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check PRIMESECU.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs PRIMESECU.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PRIMESECU.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while PRIMESECU.BO trades at ₹277.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas PRIMESECU.BO's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRIMESECU.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMESECU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check PRIMESECU.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ARIHANTCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ARIHANTCAP.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ARIHANTCAP.BO trades at ₹76.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ARIHANTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ARIHANTCAP.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AHL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AHL.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AHL.NS trades at ₹177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AHL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AHL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to AHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AHL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AHL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AHL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AHL.BO trades at ₹177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AHL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AHL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to AHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AHL.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DVL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DVL.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DVL.NS trades at ₹244.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DVL.NS's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to DVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DVL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ARIHANTCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ARIHANTCAP.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ARIHANTCAP.NS trades at ₹76.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ARIHANTCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIHANTCAP.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ARIHANTCAP.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DVL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DVL.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DVL.BO trades at ₹245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DVL.BO's P/E ratio is -57.35. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DVL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to DVL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DVL.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SMCGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SMCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SMCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SMCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to SMCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SMCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SMCGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SMCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SMCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹80.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SMCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to SMCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SMCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs VLSFINANCE.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VLSFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while VLSFINANCE.NS trades at ₹262.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas VLSFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is -45.93. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLSFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to VLSFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check VLSFINANCE.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs GCSL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GCSL.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while GCSL.NS trades at ₹357.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas GCSL.NS's P/E ratio is -59.86. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCSL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to GCSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check GCSL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs VLSFINANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VLSFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while VLSFINANCE.BO trades at ₹265.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas VLSFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is -45.64. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLSFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to VLSFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check VLSFINANCE.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs BIRLAMONEY.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BIRLAMONEY.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while BIRLAMONEY.BO trades at ₹136.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas BIRLAMONEY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIRLAMONEY.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLAMONEY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check BIRLAMONEY.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs BIRLAMONEY.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BIRLAMONEY.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while BIRLAMONEY.NS trades at ₹136.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas BIRLAMONEY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIRLAMONEY.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLAMONEY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check BIRLAMONEY.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs EMKAY.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, EMKAY.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while EMKAY.BO trades at ₹233.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas EMKAY.BO's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMKAY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to EMKAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check EMKAY.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs EMKAY.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, EMKAY.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while EMKAY.NS trades at ₹235.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas EMKAY.NS's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMKAY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to EMKAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check EMKAY.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DHUNINV.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DHUNINV.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DHUNINV.NS trades at ₹1,002.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DHUNINV.NS's P/E ratio is -21.32. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHUNINV.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to DHUNINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DHUNINV.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DHUNINV.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DHUNINV.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DHUNINV.BO trades at ₹998.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DHUNINV.BO's P/E ratio is -21.28. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHUNINV.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to DHUNINV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DHUNINV.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs THEINVEST.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, THEINVEST.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while THEINVEST.BO trades at ₹98.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas THEINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THEINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to THEINVEST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check THEINVEST.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs THEINVEST.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, THEINVEST.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while THEINVEST.NS trades at ₹95.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas THEINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THEINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to THEINVEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check THEINVEST.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs WELINV.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WELINV.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while WELINV.BO trades at ₹1,305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas WELINV.BO's P/E ratio is 149.83. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WELINV.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to WELINV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check WELINV.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs NBIFIN.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NBIFIN.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while NBIFIN.NS trades at ₹1,912.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NBIFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBIFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to NBIFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check NBIFIN.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs WELINV.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WELINV.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while WELINV.NS trades at ₹1,292.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas WELINV.NS's P/E ratio is 146.29. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WELINV.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to WELINV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check WELINV.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AVONMORE.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AVONMORE.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AVONMORE.NS trades at ₹14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AVONMORE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVONMORE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to AVONMORE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AVONMORE.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AVONMORE.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AVONMORE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AVONMORE.BO trades at ₹14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AVONMORE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVONMORE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to AVONMORE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AVONMORE.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs NAHARCAP.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NAHARCAP.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while NAHARCAP.NS trades at ₹240.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NAHARCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAHARCAP.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARCAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check NAHARCAP.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs NAHARCAP.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NAHARCAP.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while NAHARCAP.BO trades at ₹246.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NAHARCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAHARCAP.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check NAHARCAP.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SPCENET.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SPCENET.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SPCENET.NS trades at ₹5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SPCENET.NS's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPCENET.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to SPCENET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SPCENET.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ALMONDZ.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ALMONDZ.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ALMONDZ.BO trades at ₹14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ALMONDZ.BO's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALMONDZ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to ALMONDZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ALMONDZ.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs ALMONDZ.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ALMONDZ.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while ALMONDZ.NS trades at ₹14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas ALMONDZ.NS's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALMONDZ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to ALMONDZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check ALMONDZ.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs NDGL.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NDGL.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while NDGL.NS trades at ₹2,659.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas NDGL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NDGL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to NDGL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check NDGL.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DELPHIFX.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DELPHIFX.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DELPHIFX.BO trades at ₹12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DELPHIFX.BO's P/E ratio is 91.43. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DELPHIFX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to DELPHIFX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DELPHIFX.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs KEYFINSERV.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KEYFINSERV.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while KEYFINSERV.NS trades at ₹290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas KEYFINSERV.NS's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEYFINSERV.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to KEYFINSERV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check KEYFINSERV.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs KEYFINSERV.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KEYFINSERV.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while KEYFINSERV.BO trades at ₹294.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas KEYFINSERV.BO's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEYFINSERV.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to KEYFINSERV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check KEYFINSERV.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs INDBANK.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INDBANK.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while INDBANK.NS trades at ₹36.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas INDBANK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDBANK.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to INDBANK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check INDBANK.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs INDBANK.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INDBANK.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while INDBANK.BO trades at ₹36.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas INDBANK.BO's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDBANK.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to INDBANK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check INDBANK.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AUSOMENT.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AUSOMENT.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AUSOMENT.NS trades at ₹104.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AUSOMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUSOMENT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to AUSOMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AUSOMENT.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs AUSOMENT.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AUSOMENT.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while AUSOMENT.BO trades at ₹103.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas AUSOMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUSOMENT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to AUSOMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check AUSOMENT.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs STEELCITY.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, STEELCITY.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while STEELCITY.NS trades at ₹88.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas STEELCITY.NS's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STEELCITY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to STEELCITY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check STEELCITY.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs INVENTURE.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INVENTURE.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while INVENTURE.BO trades at ₹1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas INVENTURE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INVENTURE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to INVENTURE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check INVENTURE.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs INVENTURE.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INVENTURE.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while INVENTURE.NS trades at ₹1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas INVENTURE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INVENTURE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to INVENTURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check INVENTURE.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs STAMPEDE.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, STAMPEDE.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while STAMPEDE.NS trades at ₹1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas STAMPEDE.NS's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STAMPEDE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to STAMPEDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check STAMPEDE.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs JAGSONSER.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, JAGSONSER.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while JAGSONSER.BO trades at ₹60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas JAGSONSER.BO's P/E ratio is -32.39. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JAGSONSER.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to JAGSONSER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check JAGSONSER.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs BLBLIMITED.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BLBLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 996M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while BLBLIMITED.NS trades at ₹18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas BLBLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLBLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to BLBLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check BLBLIMITED.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs BLBLIMITED.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BLBLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 995.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while BLBLIMITED.BO trades at ₹18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas BLBLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLBLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to BLBLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check BLBLIMITED.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs MCDHOLDING.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MCDHOLDING.NS has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while MCDHOLDING.NS trades at ₹68.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas MCDHOLDING.NS's P/E ratio is -33.70. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCDHOLDING.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to MCDHOLDING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check MCDHOLDING.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs TTGIL.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TTGIL.BO has a market cap of 919.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while TTGIL.BO trades at ₹8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas TTGIL.BO's P/E ratio is -53.40. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTGIL.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to TTGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check TTGIL.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DBSTOCKBRO.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DBSTOCKBRO.NS has a market cap of 893.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DBSTOCKBRO.NS trades at ₹25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DBSTOCKBRO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSTOCKBRO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to DBSTOCKBRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DBSTOCKBRO.NS's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs DBSTOCKBRO.BO Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DBSTOCKBRO.BO has a market cap of 891.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while DBSTOCKBRO.BO trades at ₹25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas DBSTOCKBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DBSTOCKBRO.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is less volatile compared to DBSTOCKBRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check DBSTOCKBRO.BO's competition here
CONSOFINVT.NS vs SCAPDVR.NS Comparison February 2026
CONSOFINVT.NS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONSOFINVT.NS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SCAPDVR.NS has a market cap of 879.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSOFINVT.NS is priced at ₹240.00, while SCAPDVR.NS trades at ₹10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONSOFINVT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.66, whereas SCAPDVR.NS's P/E ratio is -260.00. In terms of profitability, CONSOFINVT.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCAPDVR.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSOFINVT.NS is more volatile compared to SCAPDVR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSOFINVT.NS.Check SCAPDVR.NS's competition here