Columbia Sportswear Company
Columbia Sportswear Company COLM Peers
See (COLM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLM | $61.65 | -2.43% | 3.5B | 16.47 | $3.86 | +1.88% |
| RL | $286.71 | -1.33% | 17.6B | 24.96 | $11.61 | +1.45% |
| LEVI | $22.09 | +13.84% | 7.8B | 21.94 | $0.90 | +3.22% |
| GIL | $50.91 | +0.71% | 7.8B | 20.12 | $2.55 | +2.08% |
| VFC | $12.40 | -0.52% | 5B | 71.81 | $0.18 | +3.49% |
| KTB | $68.50 | -1.08% | 3.9B | 17.33 | $4.07 | +3.61% |
| PVH | $73.92 | +1.83% | 3.6B | 10.48 | $7.09 | +0.25% |
| UAA | $6.91 | -0.29% | 2.9B | -15.07 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| UA | $6.50 | -1.59% | 2.9B | -14.14 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| ZGN | $8.96 | +0.06% | 2.3B | 26.03 | $0.35 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
COLM vs RL Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RL has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while RL trades at $286.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas RL's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to RL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs LEVI Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while LEVI trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs GIL Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while GIL trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs VFC Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while VFC trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 71.81. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs KTB Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while KTB trades at $68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs PVH Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while PVH trades at $73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs UAA Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while UAA trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs UA Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while UA trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -14.14. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs ZGN Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while ZGN trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs AIN Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while AIN trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs HBI Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while HBI trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -31.53. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs GOOS Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while GOOS trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs GIII Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while GIII trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs FIGS Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while FIGS trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 616.00. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs OXM Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 732.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while OXM trades at $46.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs SGC Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while SGC trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs LAKE Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while LAKE trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs UFI Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while UFI trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs CULP Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while CULP trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs NCI Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while NCI trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs JRSH Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while JRSH trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -47.14. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs JL Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while JL trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.91. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs VNCE Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while VNCE trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs LLL Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs PMNT Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while PMNT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs DXYN Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while DXYN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs JXJT Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs XELB Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while XELB trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs DLA Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs EVK Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs KBSF Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.
COLM vs SQBG Comparison
COLM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLM stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COLM is priced at $61.65, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLM currently has a P/E ratio of 16.47, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COLM's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, COLM is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLM.