Colab Platforms Limited
Colab Platforms Limited (COLAB.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (COLAB.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLAB.BO | ₹167.85 | -0.97% | 34.2B | 243.26 | ₹0.69 | +0.01% |
| PVR.NS | ₹1,454.05 | +0.00% | 142.4B | -83.09 | -₹17.50 | N/A |
| PFOCUS.NS | ₹308.80 | +20.55% | 100.8B | -62.79 | -₹4.51 | N/A |
| PFOCUS.BO | ₹308.00 | +12.18% | 100.7B | -62.61 | -₹4.52 | N/A |
| PVRINOX.BO | ₹944.85 | -4.17% | 92.6B | 434.68 | ₹2.17 | N/A |
| PVRINOX.NS | ₹946.30 | -4.03% | 92.5B | 434.06 | ₹2.17 | N/A |
| TIPSINDLTD.BO | ₹685.00 | -2.18% | 87.6B | 57.85 | ₹11.84 | +2.64% |
| TIPSINDLTD.NS | ₹680.25 | -0.58% | 87B | 60.85 | ₹11.18 | N/A |
| SAREGAMA.NS | ₹339.50 | +0.46% | 63.6B | 33.18 | ₹9.98 | +2.72% |
| SAREGAMA.BO | ₹339.45 | -1.55% | 63.6B | 33.18 | ₹9.98 | +2.72% |
Stock Comparison
COLAB.BO vs PVR.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PVR.NS has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while PVR.NS trades at ₹1,454.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas PVR.NS's P/E ratio is -83.09. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PVR.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to PVR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check PVR.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs PFOCUS.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PFOCUS.NS has a market cap of 100.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while PFOCUS.NS trades at ₹308.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas PFOCUS.NS's P/E ratio is -62.79. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFOCUS.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to PFOCUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check PFOCUS.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs PFOCUS.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PFOCUS.BO has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while PFOCUS.BO trades at ₹308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas PFOCUS.BO's P/E ratio is -62.61. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFOCUS.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to PFOCUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check PFOCUS.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs PVRINOX.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PVRINOX.BO has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while PVRINOX.BO trades at ₹944.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas PVRINOX.BO's P/E ratio is 434.68. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PVRINOX.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to PVRINOX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check PVRINOX.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs PVRINOX.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PVRINOX.NS has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while PVRINOX.NS trades at ₹946.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas PVRINOX.NS's P/E ratio is 434.06. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PVRINOX.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to PVRINOX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check PVRINOX.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs TIPSINDLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TIPSINDLTD.BO has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while TIPSINDLTD.BO trades at ₹685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas TIPSINDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 57.85. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIPSINDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to TIPSINDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check TIPSINDLTD.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs TIPSINDLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TIPSINDLTD.NS has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while TIPSINDLTD.NS trades at ₹680.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas TIPSINDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 60.85. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIPSINDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to TIPSINDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check TIPSINDLTD.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SAREGAMA.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SAREGAMA.NS has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SAREGAMA.NS trades at ₹339.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SAREGAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAREGAMA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to SAREGAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check SAREGAMA.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SAREGAMA.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SAREGAMA.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SAREGAMA.BO trades at ₹339.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SAREGAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAREGAMA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to SAREGAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check SAREGAMA.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs TIPSMUSIC.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TIPSMUSIC.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while TIPSMUSIC.NS trades at ₹515.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas TIPSMUSIC.NS's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIPSMUSIC.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to TIPSMUSIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check TIPSMUSIC.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs INOXLEISUR.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, INOXLEISUR.NS has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while INOXLEISUR.NS trades at ₹507.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas INOXLEISUR.NS's P/E ratio is -120.17. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INOXLEISUR.NS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to INOXLEISUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check INOXLEISUR.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs IMAGICAA.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, IMAGICAA.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while IMAGICAA.BO trades at ₹37.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas IMAGICAA.BO's P/E ratio is 134.21. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMAGICAA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to IMAGICAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check IMAGICAA.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs IMAGICAA.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, IMAGICAA.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while IMAGICAA.NS trades at ₹37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas IMAGICAA.NS's P/E ratio is 134.21. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMAGICAA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to IMAGICAA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check IMAGICAA.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs HATHWAY.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, HATHWAY.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while HATHWAY.NS trades at ₹9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas HATHWAY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATHWAY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to HATHWAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check HATHWAY.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs HATHWAY.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, HATHWAY.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while HATHWAY.BO trades at ₹9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas HATHWAY.BO's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATHWAY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to HATHWAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check HATHWAY.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs DEN.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, DEN.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while DEN.BO trades at ₹25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas DEN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to DEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check DEN.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs DEN.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, DEN.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while DEN.NS trades at ₹25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas DEN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to DEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check DEN.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs BALAJITELE.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, BALAJITELE.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while BALAJITELE.BO trades at ₹79.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas BALAJITELE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALAJITELE.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to BALAJITELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check BALAJITELE.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs BALAJITELE.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, BALAJITELE.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while BALAJITELE.NS trades at ₹78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas BALAJITELE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALAJITELE.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to BALAJITELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check BALAJITELE.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs GTPL.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GTPL.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while GTPL.BO trades at ₹56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas GTPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTPL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to GTPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check GTPL.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs GTPL.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GTPL.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while GTPL.NS trades at ₹57.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas GTPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTPL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to GTPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check GTPL.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs GFLLIMITED.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GFLLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while GFLLIMITED.BO trades at ₹40.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas GFLLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 382.18. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFLLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to GFLLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check GFLLIMITED.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs GFLLIMITED.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GFLLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while GFLLIMITED.NS trades at ₹40.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas GFLLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 381.36. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to GFLLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check GFLLIMITED.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs NXTDIGITAL.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, NXTDIGITAL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while NXTDIGITAL.NS trades at ₹117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas NXTDIGITAL.NS's P/E ratio is -21.27. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NXTDIGITAL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to NXTDIGITAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check NXTDIGITAL.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs DISHTV.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, DISHTV.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while DISHTV.BO trades at ₹2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas DISHTV.BO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DISHTV.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to DISHTV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check DISHTV.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs DISHTV.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, DISHTV.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while DISHTV.NS trades at ₹2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas DISHTV.NS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DISHTV.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to DISHTV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check DISHTV.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs NDLVENTURE.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, NDLVENTURE.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while NDLVENTURE.NS trades at ₹115.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas NDLVENTURE.NS's P/E ratio is 388.41. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NDLVENTURE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to NDLVENTURE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check NDLVENTURE.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs NDLVENTURE.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, NDLVENTURE.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while NDLVENTURE.BO trades at ₹116.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas NDLVENTURE.BO's P/E ratio is 400.54. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NDLVENTURE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to NDLVENTURE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check NDLVENTURE.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SHEMAROO.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SHEMAROO.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SHEMAROO.BO trades at ₹93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SHEMAROO.BO's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHEMAROO.BO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to SHEMAROO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check SHEMAROO.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SHEMAROO.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SHEMAROO.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SHEMAROO.NS trades at ₹92.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SHEMAROO.NS's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHEMAROO.NS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to SHEMAROO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check SHEMAROO.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs UFO.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, UFO.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while UFO.NS trades at ₹63.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas UFO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UFO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to UFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check UFO.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs UFO.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, UFO.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while UFO.BO trades at ₹62.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas UFO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UFO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to UFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check UFO.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs BLUEGOD.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, BLUEGOD.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while BLUEGOD.BO trades at ₹3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas BLUEGOD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUEGOD.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to BLUEGOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check BLUEGOD.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs TIPSFILMS.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TIPSFILMS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while TIPSFILMS.BO trades at ₹286.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas TIPSFILMS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIPSFILMS.BO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to TIPSFILMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check TIPSFILMS.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs TIPSFILMS.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TIPSFILMS.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while TIPSFILMS.NS trades at ₹283.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas TIPSFILMS.NS's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIPSFILMS.NS's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to TIPSFILMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check TIPSFILMS.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs BTML.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, BTML.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while BTML.NS trades at ₹5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas BTML.NS's P/E ratio is 117.40. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTML.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to BTML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check BTML.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs BTML.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, BTML.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while BTML.BO trades at ₹5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas BTML.BO's P/E ratio is 117.20. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTML.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to BTML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check BTML.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs MUKTAARTS.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, MUKTAARTS.NS has a market cap of 857.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while MUKTAARTS.NS trades at ₹38.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas MUKTAARTS.NS's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUKTAARTS.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to MUKTAARTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check MUKTAARTS.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs MUKTAARTS.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, MUKTAARTS.BO has a market cap of 848.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while MUKTAARTS.BO trades at ₹38.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas MUKTAARTS.BO's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUKTAARTS.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to MUKTAARTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check MUKTAARTS.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs CINEVISTA.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, CINEVISTA.NS has a market cap of 846M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while CINEVISTA.NS trades at ₹14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas CINEVISTA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CINEVISTA.NS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to CINEVISTA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check CINEVISTA.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs CINEVISTA.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, CINEVISTA.BO has a market cap of 834.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while CINEVISTA.BO trades at ₹15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas CINEVISTA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CINEVISTA.BO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to CINEVISTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check CINEVISTA.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs EROSMEDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, EROSMEDIA.BO has a market cap of 756.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while EROSMEDIA.BO trades at ₹7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas EROSMEDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EROSMEDIA.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to EROSMEDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check EROSMEDIA.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs EROSMEDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, EROSMEDIA.NS has a market cap of 749.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while EROSMEDIA.NS trades at ₹7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas EROSMEDIA.NS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EROSMEDIA.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO and EROSMEDIA.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EROSMEDIA.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SITINET.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SITINET.BO has a market cap of 427.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SITINET.BO trades at ₹0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SITINET.BO's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SITINET.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO and SITINET.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SITINET.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs KSERASERA.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, KSERASERA.NS has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while KSERASERA.NS trades at ₹0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas KSERASERA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSERASERA.NS's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to KSERASERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check KSERASERA.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs PNC.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PNC.BO has a market cap of 281.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while PNC.BO trades at ₹19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas PNC.BO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNC.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to PNC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check PNC.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs PNC.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PNC.NS has a market cap of 275.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while PNC.NS trades at ₹18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas PNC.NS's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNC.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to PNC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check PNC.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SITINET.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SITINET.NS has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SITINET.NS trades at ₹0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SITINET.NS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SITINET.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to SITINET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check SITINET.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SAGARPROD.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SAGARPROD.BO has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SAGARPROD.BO trades at ₹5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SAGARPROD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAGARPROD.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to SAGARPROD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check SAGARPROD.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs SILLYMONKS.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SILLYMONKS.NS has a market cap of 158.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while SILLYMONKS.NS trades at ₹15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas SILLYMONKS.NS's P/E ratio is -18.27. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SILLYMONKS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to SILLYMONKS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check SILLYMONKS.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs RADAAN.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RADAAN.BO has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while RADAAN.BO trades at ₹2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas RADAAN.BO's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RADAAN.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to RADAAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check RADAAN.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs RADAAN.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RADAAN.NS has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while RADAAN.NS trades at ₹2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas RADAAN.NS's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RADAAN.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to RADAAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check RADAAN.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs CREATIVEYE.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, CREATIVEYE.NS has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while CREATIVEYE.NS trades at ₹6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas CREATIVEYE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CREATIVEYE.NS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to CREATIVEYE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check CREATIVEYE.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs CREATIVEYE.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, CREATIVEYE.BO has a market cap of 122.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while CREATIVEYE.BO trades at ₹6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas CREATIVEYE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CREATIVEYE.BO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to CREATIVEYE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check CREATIVEYE.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs DQE.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, DQE.NS has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while DQE.NS trades at ₹0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas DQE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DQE.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to DQE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check DQE.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs RACONTEUR.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RACONTEUR.BO has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while RACONTEUR.BO trades at ₹12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas RACONTEUR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RACONTEUR.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to RACONTEUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check RACONTEUR.BO's competition here
COLAB.BO vs ORTEL.NS Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, ORTEL.NS has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while ORTEL.NS trades at ₹1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas ORTEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORTEL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to ORTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check ORTEL.NS's competition here
COLAB.BO vs GFIL.BO Comparison March 2026
COLAB.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COLAB.BO stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GFIL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COLAB.BO is priced at ₹167.85, while GFIL.BO trades at ₹28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COLAB.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 243.26, whereas GFIL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COLAB.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFIL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COLAB.BO is less volatile compared to GFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLAB.BO.Check GFIL.BO's competition here