Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A.
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A. CODYY Peers
See (CODYY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODYY | $23.30 | -1.60% | 57.9B | 17.79 | $1.31 | +2.13% |
| CODGF | $117.95 | +1.59% | 58.6B | 17.98 | $6.56 | +1.94% |
| DKILY | $12.45 | +1.67% | 36.4B | 20.40 | $0.61 | +1.32% |
| DKILF | $118.55 | -5.62% | 34.7B | 19.18 | $6.18 | +1.72% |
| GBERY | $77.62 | +0.51% | 25.6B | 34.62 | $2.24 | +1.99% |
| GBERF | $759.53 | +0.00% | 24.1B | 33.53 | $22.65 | +2.04% |
| KGSPF | $85.10 | +1.10% | 15.3B | 19.95 | $4.22 | +0.74% |
| KGSPY | $84.73 | -0.40% | 15.3B | 19.88 | $4.22 | +0.75% |
| BLHWF | $963.02 | +0.00% | 11.8B | 64.50 | $14.93 | +1.20% |
| NIABY | $4.53 | +0.00% | 9.9B | 34.85 | $0.13 | +0.07% |
Stock Comparison
CODYY vs CODGF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CODGF has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while CODGF trades at $117.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CODGF's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CODGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to CODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs DKILY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while DKILY trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs DKILF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while DKILF trades at $118.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs GBERY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GBERY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while GBERY trades at $77.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GBERY's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBERY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to GBERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs GBERF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, GBERF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while GBERF trades at $759.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas GBERF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBERF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to GBERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs KGSPF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while KGSPF trades at $85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to KGSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs KGSPY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while KGSPY trades at $84.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs BLHWF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BLHWF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while BLHWF trades at $963.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas BLHWF's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLHWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to BLHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs NIABY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NIABY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while NIABY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NIABY's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to NIABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs NDRBF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while NDRBF trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to NDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs RKWAF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to RKWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs RKWBF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while RKWBF trades at $45.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to RKWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs TOTDY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while TOTDY trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 51.58. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs FGSGF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while FGSGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to FGSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs JSGCF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while JSGCF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to JSGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs JSGRY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while JSGRY trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 227.20. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to JSGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs SNWAF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while SNWAF trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to SNWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs CSRLF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs UPNRY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs UPNRF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to UPNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs RLLWF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, RLLWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while RLLWF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas RLLWF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLLWF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to RLLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs TPRKY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TPRKY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while TPRKY trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TPRKY's P/E ratio is -29.67. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPRKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to TPRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs FBOHY Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FBOHY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while FBOHY trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas FBOHY's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBOHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to FBOHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs TVPKF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while TVPKF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to TVPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs FBOHF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, FBOHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while FBOHF trades at $840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas FBOHF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBOHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to FBOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs SCWTF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, SCWTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while SCWTF trades at $768.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas SCWTF's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCWTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to SCWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs VLUTF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 910.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to VLUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs LPUSF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to LPUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs NRTZF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while NRTZF trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to NRTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs PLSNF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to PLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs MCCK Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 351.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while MCCK trades at $45.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to MCCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs ECELF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 207.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while ECELF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to ECELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs BURCB Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 97.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BURCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to BURCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs BURCA Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, BURCA has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while BURCA trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas BURCA's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BURCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to BURCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs WHWRF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, WHWRF has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while WHWRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas WHWRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHWRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to WHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs LGNC Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while LGNC trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to LGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs OATN Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while OATN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OATN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to OATN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs UPIPF Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to UPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs ZHUD Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 160.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while ZHUD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is less volatile compared to ZHUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs LPPI Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to LPPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.
CODYY vs AFIIQ Comparison
CODYY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODYY stands at 57.9B. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 2.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CODYY is priced at $23.30, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODYY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.79, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CODYY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CODYY is more volatile compared to AFIIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODYY.