Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A.
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A. CODGF Peers
See (CODGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODGF | $111.73 | +2.83% | 55.52B | 17.85 | $6.26 | +2.03% |
| CODYY | $22.70 | -0.83% | 56.60B | 18.02 | $1.26 | +1.99% |
| DKILF | $110.17 | -2.26% | 32.26B | 18.00 | $6.12 | +1.99% |
| DKILY | $11.00 | -0.38% | 32.19B | 18.02 | $0.61 | N/A |
| GBERY | $72.31 | +0.58% | 23.82B | 33.79 | $2.14 | +1.55% |
| GBERF | $720.00 | +5.86% | 22.80B | 33.55 | $21.46 | +2.57% |
| KGSPF | $87.15 | N/A | 15.87B | 21.68 | $4.02 | +0.70% |
| KGSPY | $86.19 | -0.53% | 15.69B | 21.44 | $4.02 | +0.64% |
| BLHWF | $882.70 | +47.12% | 10.86B | 62.12 | $14.21 | +1.08% |
| NDRBF | $4.71 | +46.73% | 9.50B | 39.25 | $0.12 | +1.93% |
Stock Comparison
CODGF vs CODYY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, CODYY has a market cap of 56.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while CODYY trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas CODYY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CODYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to CODYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs DKILF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, DKILF has a market cap of 32.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while DKILF trades at $110.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas DKILF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DKILF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to DKILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs DKILY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, DKILY has a market cap of 32.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while DKILY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas DKILY's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DKILY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to DKILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs GBERY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, GBERY has a market cap of 23.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while GBERY trades at $72.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas GBERY's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBERY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to GBERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs GBERF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, GBERF has a market cap of 22.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while GBERF trades at $720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas GBERF's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBERF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to GBERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs KGSPF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, KGSPF has a market cap of 15.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while KGSPF trades at $87.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas KGSPF's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGSPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to KGSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs KGSPY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, KGSPY has a market cap of 15.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while KGSPY trades at $86.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas KGSPY's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGSPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to KGSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs BLHWF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, BLHWF has a market cap of 10.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while BLHWF trades at $882.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas BLHWF's P/E ratio is 62.12. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLHWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to BLHWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs NDRBF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, NDRBF has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while NDRBF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas NDRBF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NDRBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to NDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs NIABY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, NIABY has a market cap of 9.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while NIABY trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas NIABY's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIABY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to NIABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs RKWAF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, RKWAF has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while RKWAF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas RKWAF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKWAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to RKWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs RKWBF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, RKWBF has a market cap of 7.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while RKWBF trades at $46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas RKWBF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RKWBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to RKWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs TOTDY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, TOTDY has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while TOTDY trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas TOTDY's P/E ratio is 54.45. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOTDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to TOTDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs FGSGF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, FGSGF has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while FGSGF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas FGSGF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FGSGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to FGSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs JSGRY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, JSGRY has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while JSGRY trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas JSGRY's P/E ratio is 228.50. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JSGRY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to JSGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs SNWAF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, SNWAF has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while SNWAF trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas SNWAF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNWAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to SNWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs JSGCF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, JSGCF has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while JSGCF trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas JSGCF's P/E ratio is 226.80. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JSGCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to JSGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs CSRLF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, CSRLF has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while CSRLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas CSRLF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSRLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to CSRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs UPNRY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, UPNRY has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while UPNRY trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas UPNRY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPNRY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to UPNRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs RLLWF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, RLLWF has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while RLLWF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas RLLWF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLLWF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to RLLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs UPNRF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, UPNRF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while UPNRF trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas UPNRF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPNRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to UPNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs TPRKY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, TPRKY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while TPRKY trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas TPRKY's P/E ratio is -34.36. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPRKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to TPRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs FBOHF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, FBOHF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while FBOHF trades at $1,141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas FBOHF's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBOHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to FBOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs FBOHY Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, FBOHY has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while FBOHY trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas FBOHY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBOHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to FBOHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs TVPKF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, TVPKF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while TVPKF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas TVPKF's P/E ratio is -25.88. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TVPKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to TVPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs SCWTF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, SCWTF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while SCWTF trades at $768.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas SCWTF's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCWTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to SCWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs VLUTF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, VLUTF has a market cap of 910.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while VLUTF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas VLUTF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLUTF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to VLUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs LPUSF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, LPUSF has a market cap of 644.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while LPUSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas LPUSF's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LPUSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to LPUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs NRTZF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, NRTZF has a market cap of 593.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while NRTZF trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas NRTZF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRTZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to NRTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs PLSNF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, PLSNF has a market cap of 494.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while PLSNF trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas PLSNF's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLSNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to PLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs MCCK Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, MCCK has a market cap of 318.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while MCCK trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas MCCK's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCCK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to MCCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs ECELF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, ECELF has a market cap of 208.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while ECELF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas ECELF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECELF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to ECELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs BURCA Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, BURCA has a market cap of 85.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while BURCA trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas BURCA's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BURCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to BURCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs BURCB Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, BURCB has a market cap of 81.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while BURCB trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas BURCB's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BURCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to BURCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs WHWRF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, WHWRF has a market cap of 39.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while WHWRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas WHWRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHWRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to WHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs LGNC Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, LGNC has a market cap of 30.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while LGNC trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas LGNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to LGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs OATN Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, OATN has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while OATN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas OATN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OATN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to OATN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs UPIPF Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, UPIPF has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while UPIPF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas UPIPF's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPIPF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to UPIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs ZHUD Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, ZHUD has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while ZHUD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas ZHUD's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZHUD's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is less volatile compared to ZHUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs LPPI Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, LPPI has a market cap of 124666.00. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while LPPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas LPPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LPPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to LPPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.
CODGF vs AFIIQ Comparison
CODGF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODGF stands at 55.52B. In comparison, AFIIQ has a market cap of 2178.00. Regarding current trading prices, CODGF is priced at $111.73, while AFIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODGF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.85, whereas AFIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CODGF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AFIIQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CODGF is more volatile compared to AFIIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODGF.