ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. CNOBP Peers
See (CNOBP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNOBP | $22.60 | +0.62% | 869.42M | 7.17 | $3.15 | +3.15% |
| HDB | $72.72 | -0.29% | 185.63B | 22.38 | $3.25 | +0.81% |
| USB-PA | $845.00 | -0.03% | 69.78B | 240.74 | $3.51 | +4.59% |
| USB-PP | $22.47 | -0.35% | 69.13B | 4.84 | $4.64 | +4.59% |
| USB-PH | $20.55 | -0.04% | 68.90B | 4.43 | $4.64 | +4.59% |
| ITUB | $6.61 | -0.68% | 68.47B | 9.57 | $0.69 | +7.25% |
| PNC | $173.00 | +0.42% | 68.43B | 12.23 | $14.14 | +3.68% |
| MFG | $5.39 | -1.55% | 67.57B | 11.22 | $0.48 | +1.19% |
| USB | $43.11 | +0.51% | 67.17B | 10.67 | $4.04 | +4.59% |
| USB-PS | $18.53 | +0.16% | 66.93B | N/A | N/A | +4.59% |
Stock Comparison
CNOBP vs HDB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 185.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HDB trades at $72.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs USB-PA Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 69.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while USB-PA trades at $845.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 240.74. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs USB-PP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 69.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while USB-PP trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs USB-PH Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 68.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while USB-PH trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs ITUB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 68.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while ITUB trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs PNC Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 68.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while PNC trades at $173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs MFG Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 67.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while MFG trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs USB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 67.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while USB trades at $43.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs USB-PS Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 66.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while USB-PS trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs LYG Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 63.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while LYG trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs IBN Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 60.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while IBN trades at $33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs DB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 55.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while DB trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs TFC Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 51.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while TFC trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -207.84. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BSBR Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BSBR trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs HBANL Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HBANL trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs HBANM Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 31.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HBANM trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs TFC-PI Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 31.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while TFC-PI trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs MTB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 28.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while MTB trades at $180.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BBD Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BBD trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BBDO Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BBDO trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs TFC-PO Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while TFC-PO trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs KB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 25.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while KB trades at $69.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FCNCP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 25.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FCNCP trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FCNCO Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 25.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FCNCO trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs USB-PR Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while USB-PR trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs HBANP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HBANP trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FITB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 25.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FITB trades at $37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs TFC-PR Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while TFC-PR trades at $18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FCNCA Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FCNCA trades at $1,841.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs USB-PQ Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while USB-PQ trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs RF-PF Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while RF-PF trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs HBAN Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 22.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HBAN trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs RF-PC Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 20.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while RF-PC trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs RF Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 19.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while RF trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs SHG Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 18.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while SHG trades at $38.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs KEY-PL Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while KEY-PL trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs KEY-PJ Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 17.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs KEY-PI Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 17.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while KEY-PI trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs KEY-PK Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while KEY-PK trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CFG Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 17.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CFG trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs KEY Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 17.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while KEY trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -82.53. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FITBI Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FITBI trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BAP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BAP trades at $204.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FITBP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FITBP trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BCH Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BCH trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs RF-PE Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while RF-PE trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CFG-PD Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FITBO Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FITBO trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FHN-PB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FHN-PB trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FHN-PC Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FHN-PC trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CFG-PH Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CFG-PH trades at $26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FHN-PE Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FHN-PE trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CIB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CIB trades at $40.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs GGAL Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while GGAL trades at $62.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FHN Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FHN trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs WF Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while WF trades at $39.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs SSB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 8.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while SSB trades at $87.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FHN-PD Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FHN-PF Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FHN-PF trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs WBS Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while WBS trades at $51.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CBSH Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CBSH trades at $63.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs PNFP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while PNFP trades at $106.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CFG-PE Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CFG-PE trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs WTFCM Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while WTFCM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CFR Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CFR trades at $127.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs WAL Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while WAL trades at $72.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs WTFC Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while WTFC trades at $118.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs UMBF Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while UMBF trades at $102.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs ONBPO Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while ONBPO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs ONB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while ONB trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs ONBPP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while ONBPP trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BSMX Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CMA Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CMA trades at $56.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BPOP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BPOP trades at $102.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs ZION Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 6.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while ZION trades at $46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs PB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while PB trades at $69.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs SNV Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while SNV trades at $47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs SNV-PD Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while SNV-PD trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BOKF Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BOKF trades at $93.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BMA Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BMA trades at $92.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs CADE Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while CADE trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs HOMB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HOMB trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BXS Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs UBSI Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while UBSI trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs VLYPP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while VLYPP trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs OZK Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while OZK trades at $44.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs VLYPO Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while VLYPO trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FNB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FNB trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs COLB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while COLB trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FFIN Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FFIN trades at $34.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs FLG Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while FLG trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs VLY Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while VLY trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs HWCPZ Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HWCPZ trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs HWC Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while HWC trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs GBCI Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while GBCI trades at $41.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs AUBAP Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs NYCB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while NYCB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs BBAR Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while BBAR trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.
CNOBP vs ABCB Comparison
CNOBP plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNOBP stands at 869.42M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CNOBP is priced at $22.60, while ABCB trades at $61.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNOBP currently has a P/E ratio of 7.17, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, CNOBP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNOBP is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNOBP.