Cineworld Group plc
Cineworld Group plc (CNNWQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNNWQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNNWQ | $0.01 | -18.40% | 7M | -0.02 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| UMGNF | $29.14 | +0.16% | 54.3B | 18.04 | $1.64 | +1.97% |
| UNVGY | $14.60 | +0.48% | 53.6B | 17.80 | $0.82 | +2.18% |
| FWONB | $87.68 | -7.71% | 31.8B | 86.81 | $1.01 | N/A |
| NWSAL | $26.80 | +0.00% | 17.1B | 43.23 | $0.62 | +0.75% |
| BOIVF | $5.89 | -0.59% | 16.4B | 98.08 | $0.06 | +1.55% |
| CEVMY | $30.50 | +0.00% | 11.7B | 35.47 | $0.86 | +0.97% |
| VIVEF | $10.49 | +2.64% | 10.6B | 22.80 | $0.46 | +0.43% |
| TKCOF | $62.01 | +0.00% | 10.5B | 40.01 | $1.55 | +1.50% |
| CEVMF | $94.15 | -19.53% | 9B | 27.37 | $3.44 | +2.06% |
Stock Comparison
CNNWQ vs UMGNF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, UMGNF has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while UMGNF trades at $29.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UMGNF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to UMGNF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to UMGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check UMGNF's competition here
CNNWQ vs UNVGY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, UNVGY has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while UNVGY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UNVGY's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to UNVGY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to UNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check UNVGY's competition here
CNNWQ vs FWONB Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, FWONB has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while FWONB trades at $87.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FWONB's P/E ratio is 86.81. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FWONB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to FWONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check FWONB's competition here
CNNWQ vs NWSAL Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, NWSAL has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while NWSAL trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NWSAL's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NWSAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to NWSAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check NWSAL's competition here
CNNWQ vs BOIVF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, BOIVF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while BOIVF trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BOIVF's P/E ratio is 98.08. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BOIVF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to BOIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check BOIVF's competition here
CNNWQ vs CEVMY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CEVMY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CEVMY trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CEVMY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CEVMY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to CEVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CEVMY's competition here
CNNWQ vs VIVEF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, VIVEF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while VIVEF trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VIVEF's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to VIVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check VIVEF's competition here
CNNWQ vs TKCOF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, TKCOF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while TKCOF trades at $62.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TKCOF's P/E ratio is 40.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TKCOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to TKCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check TKCOF's competition here
CNNWQ vs CEVMF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CEVMF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CEVMF trades at $94.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CEVMF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CEVMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to CEVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CEVMF's competition here
CNNWQ vs TOEAF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, TOEAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while TOEAF trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TOEAF's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TOEAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to TOEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check TOEAF's competition here
CNNWQ vs VIVHY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, VIVHY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while VIVHY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VIVHY's P/E ratio is -19.11. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to VIVHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check VIVHY's competition here
CNNWQ vs MCHOY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, MCHOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while MCHOY trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MCHOY's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHOY's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to MCHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check MCHOY's competition here
CNNWQ vs MCOIF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, MCOIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while MCOIF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MCOIF's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MCOIF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to MCOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check MCOIF's competition here
CNNWQ vs NANHF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, NANHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while NANHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NANHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NANHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to NANHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check NANHF's competition here
CNNWQ vs NNMTF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, NNMTF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while NNMTF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NNMTF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NNMTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to NNMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check NNMTF's competition here
CNNWQ vs NENTY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, NENTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while NENTY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NENTY's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NENTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to NENTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check NENTY's competition here
CNNWQ vs CYFWF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CYFWF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CYFWF trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CYFWF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CYFWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to CYFWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CYFWF's competition here
CNNWQ vs CYFWY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CYFWY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CYFWY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CYFWY's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CYFWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to CYFWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CYFWY's competition here
CNNWQ vs MHSDF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, MHSDF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while MHSDF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MHSDF's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MHSDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to MHSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check MHSDF's competition here
CNNWQ vs ATVDY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ATVDY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ATVDY trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATVDY's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ATVDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to ATVDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ATVDY's competition here
CNNWQ vs AIOSF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, AIOSF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while AIOSF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIOSF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AIOSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to AIOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check AIOSF's competition here
CNNWQ vs CIEZF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CIEZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CIEZF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CIEZF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CIEZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to CIEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CIEZF's competition here
CNNWQ vs JVTSF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, JVTSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while JVTSF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JVTSF's P/E ratio is -340.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to JVTSF's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to JVTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check JVTSF's competition here
CNNWQ vs TCLRY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, TCLRY has a market cap of 852.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while TCLRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCLRY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TCLRY's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to TCLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check TCLRY's competition here
CNNWQ vs CPXGF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CPXGF has a market cap of 520.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CPXGF trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CPXGF's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CPXGF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to CPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CPXGF's competition here
CNNWQ vs BORUF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, BORUF has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while BORUF trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BORUF's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BORUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to BORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check BORUF's competition here
CNNWQ vs IMXCF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, IMXCF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while IMXCF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IMXCF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to IMXCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to IMXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check IMXCF's competition here
CNNWQ vs WLDBF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, WLDBF has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while WLDBF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WLDBF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WLDBF's ROE of +4.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to WLDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check WLDBF's competition here
CNNWQ vs CLTFF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CLTFF has a market cap of 223.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CLTFF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLTFF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CLTFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to CLTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CLTFF's competition here
CNNWQ vs AFCJF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, AFCJF has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while AFCJF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AFCJF's P/E ratio is -17.90. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFCJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to AFCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check AFCJF's competition here
CNNWQ vs CLQDF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CLQDF has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CLQDF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLQDF's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CLQDF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to CLQDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CLQDF's competition here
CNNWQ vs NENTF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, NENTF has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while NENTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NENTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NENTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to NENTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check NENTF's competition here
CNNWQ vs GOAI Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, GOAI has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while GOAI trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GOAI's P/E ratio is 113.75. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GOAI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to GOAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check GOAI's competition here
CNNWQ vs APTTF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, APTTF has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while APTTF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas APTTF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APTTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to APTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check APTTF's competition here
CNNWQ vs STEAF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, STEAF has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while STEAF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STEAF's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to STEAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to STEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check STEAF's competition here
CNNWQ vs ANGMF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ANGMF has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ANGMF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ANGMF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ANGMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to ANGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ANGMF's competition here
CNNWQ vs THBRF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, THBRF has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while THBRF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas THBRF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to THBRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to THBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check THBRF's competition here
CNNWQ vs GMSQF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, GMSQF has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while GMSQF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GMSQF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GMSQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to GMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check GMSQF's competition here
CNNWQ vs ICABY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ICABY has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ICABY trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ICABY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ICABY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to ICABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ICABY's competition here
CNNWQ vs OAMCF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, OAMCF has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while OAMCF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OAMCF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to OAMCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to OAMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check OAMCF's competition here
CNNWQ vs ZUMRF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ZUMRF has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ZUMRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZUMRF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUMRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to ZUMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ZUMRF's competition here
CNNWQ vs LGMH Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, LGMH has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while LGMH trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LGMH's P/E ratio is -66.66. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to LGMH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to LGMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check LGMH's competition here
CNNWQ vs APHP Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, APHP has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while APHP trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas APHP's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APHP's ROE of +3.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to APHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check APHP's competition here
CNNWQ vs ASGRF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ASGRF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ASGRF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASGRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGRF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to ASGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ASGRF's competition here
CNNWQ vs QYOUF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, QYOUF has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while QYOUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QYOUF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to QYOUF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to QYOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check QYOUF's competition here
CNNWQ vs BBOP Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, BBOP has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while BBOP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BBOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to BBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check BBOP's competition here
CNNWQ vs CNWGQ Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CNWGQ has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CNWGQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNWGQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CNWGQ's ROE of +9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to CNWGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CNWGQ's competition here
CNNWQ vs XOEEF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, XOEEF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while XOEEF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XOEEF's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to XOEEF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to XOEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check XOEEF's competition here
CNNWQ vs HWAL Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, HWAL has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while HWAL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HWAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HWAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to HWAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check HWAL's competition here
CNNWQ vs ICABF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ICABF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ICABF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ICABF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ICABF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to ICABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ICABF's competition here
CNNWQ vs MVNC Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, MVNC has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while MVNC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MVNC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MVNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to MVNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check MVNC's competition here
CNNWQ vs AMFL Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, AMFL has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while AMFL trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMFL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AMFL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to AMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check AMFL's competition here
CNNWQ vs GULDF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, GULDF has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while GULDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GULDF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GULDF's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to GULDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check GULDF's competition here
CNNWQ vs TRMNF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, TRMNF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while TRMNF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TRMNF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TRMNF's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to TRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check TRMNF's competition here
CNNWQ vs ENTEF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ENTEF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ENTEF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENTEF's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ENTEF's ROE of +602.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to ENTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ENTEF's competition here
CNNWQ vs HHSE Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, HHSE has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while HHSE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HHSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HHSE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to HHSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check HHSE's competition here
CNNWQ vs BLIBQ Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, BLIBQ has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while BLIBQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BLIBQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BLIBQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to BLIBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check BLIBQ's competition here
CNNWQ vs EEGI Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, EEGI has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while EEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EEGI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to EEGI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to EEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check EEGI's competition here
CNNWQ vs LTES Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, LTES has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while LTES trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LTES's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to LTES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to LTES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check LTES's competition here
CNNWQ vs CAPV Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CAPV has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CAPV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CAPV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CAPV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to CAPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CAPV's competition here
CNNWQ vs BLIAQ Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, BLIAQ has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while BLIAQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BLIAQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BLIAQ's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to BLIAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check BLIAQ's competition here
CNNWQ vs ITVI Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, ITVI has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while ITVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ITVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ITVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to ITVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check ITVI's competition here
CNNWQ vs NETWF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, NETWF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while NETWF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NETWF's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NETWF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to NETWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check NETWF's competition here
CNNWQ vs STGZ Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, STGZ has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while STGZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STGZ's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to STGZ's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to STGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check STGZ's competition here
CNNWQ vs BSEG Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, BSEG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while BSEG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BSEG's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BSEG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to BSEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check BSEG's competition here
CNNWQ vs HDUP Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, HDUP has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while HDUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HDUP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HDUP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to HDUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check HDUP's competition here
CNNWQ vs STCXF Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, STCXF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while STCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to STCXF's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to STCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check STCXF's competition here
CNNWQ vs SEGI Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, SEGI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while SEGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SEGI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SEGI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to SEGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check SEGI's competition here
CNNWQ vs AFOM Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, AFOM has a market cap of 925.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while AFOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AFOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AFOM's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to AFOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check AFOM's competition here
CNNWQ vs HQGE Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, HQGE has a market cap of 774K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while HQGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HQGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HQGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to HQGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check HQGE's competition here
CNNWQ vs WRIT Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, WRIT has a market cap of 736K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while WRIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WRIT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WRIT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to WRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check WRIT's competition here
CNNWQ vs DTTVY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, DTTVY has a market cap of 695.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while DTTVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DTTVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DTTVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to DTTVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check DTTVY's competition here
CNNWQ vs RLTR Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, RLTR has a market cap of 605.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while RLTR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RLTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RLTR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to RLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check RLTR's competition here
CNNWQ vs VNUE Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, VNUE has a market cap of 590.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while VNUE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VNUE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VNUE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to VNUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check VNUE's competition here
CNNWQ vs SONG Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, SONG has a market cap of 500.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while SONG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SONG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SONG's ROE of -9.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to SONG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check SONG's competition here
CNNWQ vs CCLX Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CCLX has a market cap of 499.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CCLX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CCLX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to CCLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CCLX's competition here
CNNWQ vs UMGP Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, UMGP has a market cap of 474.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while UMGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UMGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to UMGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to UMGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check UMGP's competition here
CNNWQ vs TAMG Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, TAMG has a market cap of 463.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while TAMG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TAMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TAMG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to TAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check TAMG's competition here
CNNWQ vs WEBB Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, WEBB has a market cap of 389.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while WEBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WEBB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WEBB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to WEBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check WEBB's competition here
CNNWQ vs IMTV Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, IMTV has a market cap of 313.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while IMTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IMTV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to IMTV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to IMTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check IMTV's competition here
CNNWQ vs CEXE Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, CEXE has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while CEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CEXE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CEXE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to CEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check CEXE's competition here
CNNWQ vs RIVU Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, RIVU has a market cap of 244.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while RIVU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RIVU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RIVU's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to RIVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check RIVU's competition here
CNNWQ vs BOTY Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, BOTY has a market cap of 230.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while BOTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BOTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BOTY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to BOTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check BOTY's competition here
CNNWQ vs MIKP Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, MIKP has a market cap of 222.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while MIKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MIKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MIKP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to MIKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check MIKP's competition here
CNNWQ vs VGTL Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, VGTL has a market cap of 205.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while VGTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VGTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VGTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to VGTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check VGTL's competition here
CNNWQ vs MLFB Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, MLFB has a market cap of 148.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while MLFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MLFB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MLFB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to MLFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check MLFB's competition here
CNNWQ vs SNMN Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, SNMN has a market cap of 112.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while SNMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNMN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SNMN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to SNMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check SNMN's competition here
CNNWQ vs RWMI Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, RWMI has a market cap of 77K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while RWMI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RWMI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to RWMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check RWMI's competition here
CNNWQ vs URBT Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, URBT has a market cap of 63K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while URBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas URBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to URBT's ROE of +67.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to URBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check URBT's competition here
CNNWQ vs SVSN Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, SVSN has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while SVSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SVSN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SVSN's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to SVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check SVSN's competition here
CNNWQ vs GBHL Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, GBHL has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while GBHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GBHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GBHL's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to GBHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check GBHL's competition here
CNNWQ vs AMRU Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, AMRU has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while AMRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to AMRU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to AMRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check AMRU's competition here
CNNWQ vs SAPX Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, SAPX has a market cap of 42.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while SAPX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SAPX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to SAPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check SAPX's competition here
CNNWQ vs SAKL Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, SAKL has a market cap of 41.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while SAKL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SAKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SAKL's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to SAKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check SAKL's competition here
CNNWQ vs HOMU Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, HOMU has a market cap of 37.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while HOMU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HOMU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HOMU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to HOMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check HOMU's competition here
CNNWQ vs XSPT Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, XSPT has a market cap of 33.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while XSPT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XSPT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to XSPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to XSPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check XSPT's competition here
CNNWQ vs PLFX Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, PLFX has a market cap of 28.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while PLFX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PLFX's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to PLFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check PLFX's competition here
CNNWQ vs GTOR Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, GTOR has a market cap of 24.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while GTOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GTOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GTOR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is more volatile compared to GTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check GTOR's competition here
CNNWQ vs SNWR Comparison August 2025
CNNWQ plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNNWQ stands at 7M. In comparison, SNWR has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CNNWQ is priced at $0.01, while SNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNNWQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SNWR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNNWQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SNWR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNNWQ is less volatile compared to SNWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNNWQ.Check SNWR's competition here