Canadian Utilities Limited 2ND PFD SER Y
Canadian Utilities Limited 2ND PFD SER Y (CNAUF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNAUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Diversified Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNAUF | $15.00 | +0.00% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.19% |
| IBDSF | $18.85 | -2.71% | 126B | 22.34 | $0.87 | +3.02% |
| IBDRY | $76.41 | -0.98% | 125.4B | 22.38 | $3.48 | +3.71% |
| ESOCF | $9.57 | +0.63% | 97.2B | 13.67 | $0.70 | +5.44% |
| ENLAY | $9.47 | +1.07% | 96.2B | 13.53 | $0.70 | +5.51% |
| PPWLM | $193.25 | -0.90% | 69B | 81.27 | $2.38 | +1.81% |
| PPWLO | $153.45 | -1.00% | 54.8B | 64.53 | $2.38 | +1.81% |
| ENGIY | $21.75 | -0.78% | 53.6B | 9.34 | $2.36 | +7.62% |
| ECIFF | $12.86 | +0.00% | 53.6B | -2.39 | -$5.39 | N/A |
| ENGQF | $22.03 | -0.99% | 53.4B | 9.33 | $2.36 | +7.65% |
Stock Comparison
CNAUF vs IBDSF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IBDSF has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while IBDSF trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBDSF's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to IBDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check IBDSF's competition here
CNAUF vs IBDRY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IBDRY has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while IBDRY trades at $76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBDRY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBDRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to IBDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check IBDRY's competition here
CNAUF vs ESOCF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ESOCF has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ESOCF trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESOCF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESOCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to ESOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ESOCF's competition here
CNAUF vs ENLAY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ENLAY has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ENLAY trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENLAY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENLAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to ENLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ENLAY's competition here
CNAUF vs PPWLM Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PPWLM has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while PPWLM trades at $193.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPWLM's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPWLM's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to PPWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check PPWLM's competition here
CNAUF vs PPWLO Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PPWLO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while PPWLO trades at $153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPWLO's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPWLO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to PPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check PPWLO's competition here
CNAUF vs ENGIY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ENGIY has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ENGIY trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGIY's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to ENGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ENGIY's competition here
CNAUF vs ECIFF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ECIFF has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ECIFF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECIFF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECIFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to ECIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ECIFF's competition here
CNAUF vs ENGQF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ENGQF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ENGQF trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGQF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENGQF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to ENGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ENGQF's competition here
CNAUF vs ECIFY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ECIFY has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ECIFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECIFY's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECIFY's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to ECIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ECIFY's competition here
CNAUF vs EONGY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EONGY has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while EONGY trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EONGY's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EONGY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to EONGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check EONGY's competition here
CNAUF vs ENAKF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ENAKF has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ENAKF trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENAKF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENAKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to ENAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ENAKF's competition here
CNAUF vs RWNFF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RWNFF has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while RWNFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWNFF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to RWNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check RWNFF's competition here
CNAUF vs RWEOY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RWEOY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while RWEOY trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWEOY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RWEOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to RWEOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check RWEOY's competition here
CNAUF vs SSEZY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SSEZY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while SSEZY trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSEZY's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSEZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to SSEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check SSEZY's competition here
CNAUF vs SSEZF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SSEZF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while SSEZF trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSEZF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSEZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to SSEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check SSEZF's competition here
CNAUF vs EDPFY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EDPFY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while EDPFY trades at $44.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDPFY's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDPFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to EDPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check EDPFY's competition here
CNAUF vs ELCPF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ELCPF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ELCPF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELCPF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELCPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to ELCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ELCPF's competition here
CNAUF vs CHUEF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CHUEF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CHUEF trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHUEF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHUEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to CHUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CHUEF's competition here
CNAUF vs AEMMF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AEMMF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while AEMMF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMMF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEMMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to AEMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check AEMMF's competition here
CNAUF vs AEMMY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AEMMY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while AEMMY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEMMY's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEMMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to AEMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check AEMMY's competition here
CNAUF vs CDUUF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CDUUF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CDUUF trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDUUF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDUUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to CDUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CDUUF's competition here
CNAUF vs CDUAF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CDUAF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CDUAF trades at $28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDUAF's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDUAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to CDUAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CDUAF's competition here
CNAUF vs CUTLF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CUTLF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CUTLF trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUTLF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUTLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to CUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CUTLF's competition here
CNAUF vs CNUTF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CNUTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CNUTF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNUTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNUTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to CNUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CNUTF's competition here
CNAUF vs CDUTF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CDUTF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CDUTF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDUTF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDUTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to CDUTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CDUTF's competition here
CNAUF vs HRASF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HRASF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while HRASF trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRASF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRASF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to HRASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check HRASF's competition here
CNAUF vs ACEJF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ACEJF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ACEJF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACEJF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACEJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to ACEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ACEJF's competition here
CNAUF vs ACLTF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ACLTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ACLTF trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLTF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACLTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to ACLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ACLTF's competition here
CNAUF vs IRDEF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IRDEF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while IRDEF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDEF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRDEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to IRDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check IRDEF's competition here
CNAUF vs ACLLF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ACLLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ACLLF trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLLF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to ACLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ACLLF's competition here
CNAUF vs VETTF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VETTF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while VETTF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VETTF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VETTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to VETTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check VETTF's competition here
CNAUF vs CSGEF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CSGEF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CSGEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGEF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSGEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to CSGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CSGEF's competition here
CNAUF vs IRDEY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IRDEY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while IRDEY trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDEY's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRDEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to IRDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check IRDEY's competition here
CNAUF vs GLVNF Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GLVNF has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while GLVNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLVNF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLVNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to GLVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check GLVNF's competition here
CNAUF vs ARAO Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ARAO has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while ARAO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARAO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to ARAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check ARAO's competition here
CNAUF vs PBEV Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PBEV has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while PBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBEV's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to PBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check PBEV's competition here
CNAUF vs CMNR Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CMNR has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while CMNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMNR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is less volatile compared to CMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check CMNR's competition here
CNAUF vs EVNVY Comparison August 2025
CNAUF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNAUF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EVNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNAUF is priced at $15.00, while EVNVY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNAUF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVNVY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, CNAUF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVNVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CNAUF is more volatile compared to EVNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNAUF.Check EVNVY's competition here