Clever Leaves Holdings Inc.
Clever Leaves Holdings Inc. CLVRW Peers
See (CLVRW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLVRW | $0.03 | N/A | 702 | -0.01 | -$1.82 | N/A |
| ZTS | $165.40 | -0.52% | 73.6B | 29.69 | $5.57 | +1.13% |
| HLN | $11.28 | +0.45% | 50.9B | 26.86 | $0.42 | +1.49% |
| TAK | $14.59 | -0.58% | 45.9B | 63.41 | $0.23 | +4.05% |
| TEVA | $18.14 | +2.43% | 20.8B | -15.77 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ITCI | $131.87 | N/A | 14B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| NBIX | $123.03 | +0.32% | 12.2B | 41.56 | $2.96 | N/A |
| RDY | $14.57 | -1.25% | 12.1B | 18.21 | $0.80 | +0.66% |
| CTLT | $63.48 | N/A | 11.5B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| VTRS | $8.59 | -0.12% | 10.1B | -2.70 | -$3.18 | +5.63% |
Stock Comparison
CLVRW vs ZTS Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ZTS trades at $165.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs HLN Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while HLN trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TAK Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TAK has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TAK trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TAK's P/E ratio is 63.41. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TAK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TEVA Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TEVA trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TEVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ITCI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW and ITCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLVRW vs NBIX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while NBIX trades at $123.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs RDY Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while RDY trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs CTLT Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs VTRS Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while VTRS trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs RGC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while RGC trades at $520.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -1531.00. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to RGC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ELAN Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ELAN trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ELAN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs LNTH Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while LNTH trades at $74.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs PRGO Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while PRGO trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -22.58. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ALVO Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ALVO trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ALVO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs AMRX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while AMRX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is -180.25. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ALVOW Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ALVOW trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs HCM Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while HCM trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 66.15. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs DCPH Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs BGM Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while BGM trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -58.35. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs EMBCV Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs SUPN Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SUPN trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SUPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs BHC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while BHC trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is -37.92. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TARO Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs INDV Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while INDV trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is -240.60. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to INDV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs EVO Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while EVO trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ANIP Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ANIP trades at $57.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is -48.99. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ANIP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs AMPH Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while AMPH trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs PCRX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while PCRX trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PCRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs DVAX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while DVAX trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs PAHC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 993.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while PAHC trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs HROW Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, HROW has a market cap of 951.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while HROW trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HROW's P/E ratio is -42.49. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to HROW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to HROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs COLL Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 929.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while COLL trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs PETQ Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs AVDL Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 875.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while AVDL trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -34.81. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs CRON Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 776.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while CRON trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CRON's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs EMBC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 616.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while EMBC trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to EMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs EOLS Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 599.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while EOLS trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EOLS's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs BDSI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TLRY Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 461M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TLRY trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs SIGA Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 435.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SIGA trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ZYBT Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 417M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ZYBT trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is 146.67. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs KMDA Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while KMDA trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ORGO Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 364.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ORGO trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is -17.94. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ORGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs EBS Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, EBS has a market cap of 353.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while EBS trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EBS's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EBS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to EBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs SNDL Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 334.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SNDL trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs CGC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, CGC has a market cap of 316.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while CGC trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CGC's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CGC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to CGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TKNO Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 310M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TKNO trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ACB Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ACB trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ACB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ALIM Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs AQST Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 271.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while AQST trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs LNDC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LNDC's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs LFCR Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 255.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while LFCR trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TYHT Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs DERM Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 184.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while DERM trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DERM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs OGI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while OGI trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to OGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs REPH Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ESPR Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ESPR has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ESPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESPR's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ESPR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ESPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs BIOA Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, BIOA has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while BIOA trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BIOA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BIOA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to BIOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs THTX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while THTX trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs SCTL Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs PROC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while PROC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs CRDL Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while CRDL trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs OPTN Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while OPTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW and OPTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLVRW vs IRWD Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while IRWD trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to IRWD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ZOM Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ZOM has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ZOM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZOM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ZOM's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ZOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs GRVI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to GRVI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs CPIX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 87.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while CPIX trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs INCR Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while INCR trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ZYNE Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs SSIC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ASRT Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ASRT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs VLNS Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs JUPW Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -9.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs SXTC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SXTC has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SXTC trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SXTC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SXTC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SXTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs QLI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, QLI has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while QLI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QLI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to QLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW and QLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLVRW vs SCYX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SCYX trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs QNTM Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while QNTM trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to QNTM's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs RMTI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while RMTI trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -95.00. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs HEXO Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs KALA Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, KALA has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while KALA trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KALA's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to KALA's ROE of -3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to KALA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs CYTH Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to CYTH's ROE of +7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW and CYTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CLVRW vs EGRX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, EGRX has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while EGRX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EGRX's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to EGRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to EGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs GELS Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while GELS trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to GELS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TXMD Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TXMD trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TXMD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs IXHL Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, IXHL has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while IXHL trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IXHL's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to IXHL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to IXHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs DRRX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while DRRX trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to DRRX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs FLGC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while FLGC trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs SISI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, SISI has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while SISI trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SISI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to SISI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to SISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs ACRX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs PRPH Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, PRPH has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while PRPH trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRPH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to PRPH's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to PRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs COSM Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while COSM trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs AYTU Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while AYTU trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AYTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs AGRX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs TLPH Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while TLPH trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs YCBD Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, YCBD has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while YCBD trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YCBD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to YCBD's ROE of -8.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to YCBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs IMCC Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, IMCC has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while IMCC trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMCC's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to IMCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to IMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs BFRIW Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, BFRIW has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while BFRIW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BFRIW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to BFRIW's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to BFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs NLTX Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.
CLVRW vs LCI Comparison
CLVRW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLVRW stands at 702. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLVRW is priced at $0.03, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLVRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLVRW's ROE is -0.55%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CLVRW is less volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLVRW.