Celestica Inc.

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 17.61B. In comparison, WIFI.CN has a market cap of 17.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at $153.13, while WIFI.CN trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.94, whereas WIFI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIFI.CN's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to WIFI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 17.61B. In comparison, HEAT.CN has a market cap of 10.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at $153.13, while HEAT.CN trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.94, whereas HEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HEAT.CN's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to HEAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 17.61B. In comparison, ZTE.CN has a market cap of 8.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at $153.13, while ZTE.CN trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.94, whereas ZTE.CN's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZTE.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to ZTE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 17.61B. In comparison, MARY.CN has a market cap of 432279.00. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at $153.13, while MARY.CN trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.94, whereas MARY.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MARY.CN's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to MARY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.