Celestica Inc.

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 32.9B. In comparison, WIFI.CN has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$273.15, while WIFI.CN trades at CA$0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.29, whereas WIFI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WIFI.CN's ROE of -7.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to WIFI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check WIFI.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 32.9B. In comparison, ZTE.CN has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$273.15, while ZTE.CN trades at CA$0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.29, whereas ZTE.CN's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZTE.CN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to ZTE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check ZTE.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 32.9B. In comparison, HEAT.CN has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$273.15, while HEAT.CN trades at CA$0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.29, whereas HEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HEAT.CN's ROE of -25.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to HEAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check HEAT.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 32.9B. In comparison, MARY.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$273.15, while MARY.CN trades at CA$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.29, whereas MARY.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MARY.CN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to MARY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check MARY.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 32.9B. In comparison, PHO.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$273.15, while PHO.TO trades at CA$3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.29, whereas PHO.TO's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PHO.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to PHO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check PHO.TO's competition here