Celestica Inc.

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 44.7B. In comparison, HEAT.CN has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$388.66, while HEAT.CN trades at CA$0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.62, whereas HEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HEAT.CN's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to HEAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check HEAT.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 44.7B. In comparison, ZTE.CN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$388.66, while ZTE.CN trades at CA$0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.62, whereas ZTE.CN's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ZTE.CN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is less volatile compared to ZTE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check ZTE.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 44.7B. In comparison, WIFI.CN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$388.66, while WIFI.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.62, whereas WIFI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WIFI.CN's ROE of +3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is less volatile compared to WIFI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check WIFI.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 44.7B. In comparison, MARY.CN has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$388.66, while MARY.CN trades at CA$0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.62, whereas MARY.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MARY.CN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to MARY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check MARY.CN's competition here

CLS.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLS.TO stands at 44.7B. In comparison, PHO.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLS.TO is priced at CA$388.66, while PHO.TO trades at CA$3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.62, whereas PHO.TO's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, CLS.TO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PHO.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLS.TO is more volatile compared to PHO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLS.TO.Check PHO.TO's competition here