Cloetta AB (publ)
Cloetta AB (publ) CLOEF Peers
See (CLOEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOEF | $3.70 | +0.00% | 1B | 16.09 | $0.23 | +0.32% |
| COCXF | $110,001.20 | +759.38% | 467.6B | 31.24 | $3,520.70 | +1.68% |
| LDSVF | $15,947.54 | -4.00% | 36.6B | 44.86 | $355.49 | +0.94% |
| BRRLY | $11.48 | -2.75% | 6.3B | 35.86 | $0.32 | +2.77% |
| BYCBF | $1,072.35 | +0.00% | 5.9B | 33.48 | $32.03 | +2.97% |
| CHLSY | $16.70 | -2.08% | 3.9B | 47.70 | $0.35 | +1.08% |
| MGAAF | $15.51 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 20.96 | $0.74 | +0.02% |
| UELKY | $26.23 | +0.00% | 968.6M | 5.67 | $4.63 | +7.86% |
| HCHOF | $4.68 | +4.00% | 658.9M | -78.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| RSGUF | $4.19 | -1.12% | 536.9M | 12.70 | $0.33 | +6.11% |
Stock Comparison
CLOEF vs COCXF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, COCXF has a market cap of 467.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while COCXF trades at $110,001.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas COCXF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COCXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to COCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs LDSVF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, LDSVF has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while LDSVF trades at $15,947.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas LDSVF's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LDSVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to LDSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs BRRLY Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, BRRLY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while BRRLY trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BRRLY's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRRLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to BRRLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs BYCBF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, BYCBF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while BYCBF trades at $1,072.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas BYCBF's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BYCBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to BYCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs CHLSY Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, CHLSY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while CHLSY trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas CHLSY's P/E ratio is 47.70. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHLSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to CHLSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs MGAAF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, MGAAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while MGAAF trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas MGAAF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to MGAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs UELKY Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, UELKY has a market cap of 968.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while UELKY trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas UELKY's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UELKY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to UELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs HCHOF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, HCHOF has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while HCHOF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas HCHOF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCHOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to HCHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs RSGUF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, RSGUF has a market cap of 536.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while RSGUF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas RSGUF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSGUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to RSGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs PEFDF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, PEFDF has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while PEFDF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas PEFDF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEFDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to PEFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs QQFSF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, QQFSF has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while QQFSF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas QQFSF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QQFSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to QQFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs FVGCF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, FVGCF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while FVGCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas FVGCF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FVGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to FVGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs RLGDF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, RLGDF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while RLGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas RLGDF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to RLGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs YWGRF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, YWGRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while YWGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas YWGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YWGRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to YWGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs GUMYF Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, GUMYF has a market cap of 654.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while GUMYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GUMYF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUMYF's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to GUMYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs GNGR Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, GNGR has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while GNGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GNGR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to GNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs EVRN Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, EVRN has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while EVRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas EVRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to EVRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs HWVI Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, HWVI has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while HWVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas HWVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to HWVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs ASCS Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, ASCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while ASCS trades at $5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas ASCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to ASCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.
CLOEF vs GUMYD Comparison
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, GUMYD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while GUMYD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.09, whereas GUMYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUMYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is more volatile compared to GUMYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.