Cloetta AB (publ)
Cloetta AB (publ) (CLOEF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLOEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOEF | $3.70 | +0.00% | 1B | 15.42 | $0.24 | +3.04% |
| COCXF | $110,001.20 | +759.38% | 443.7B | 31.24 | $3,520.70 | +1.68% |
| LDSVF | $14,910.00 | -1.26% | 34B | 42.75 | $348.81 | +1.01% |
| BYCBF | $1,321.05 | +0.00% | 7.2B | 40.49 | $32.63 | +2.41% |
| BRRLY | $12.26 | +1.37% | 6.7B | 37.12 | $0.33 | +2.61% |
| CHLSY | $14.64 | -0.27% | 3.4B | 41.59 | $0.35 | +1.50% |
| MGAAF | $15.51 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 20.96 | $0.74 | +0.02% |
| UELKY | $26.23 | +0.00% | 968.6M | 5.76 | $4.55 | +7.86% |
| HCHOF | $4.68 | +4.00% | 658.9M | -78.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| RSGUF | $4.08 | -0.97% | 525.3M | 12.42 | $0.33 | +6.22% |
Stock Comparison
CLOEF vs COCXF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, COCXF has a market cap of 443.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while COCXF trades at $110,001.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas COCXF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COCXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to COCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check COCXF's competition here
CLOEF vs LDSVF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, LDSVF has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while LDSVF trades at $14,910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas LDSVF's P/E ratio is 42.75. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LDSVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to LDSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check LDSVF's competition here
CLOEF vs BYCBF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, BYCBF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while BYCBF trades at $1,321.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas BYCBF's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BYCBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to BYCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check BYCBF's competition here
CLOEF vs BRRLY Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, BRRLY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while BRRLY trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas BRRLY's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRRLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to BRRLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check BRRLY's competition here
CLOEF vs CHLSY Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, CHLSY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while CHLSY trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas CHLSY's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHLSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to CHLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check CHLSY's competition here
CLOEF vs MGAAF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, MGAAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while MGAAF trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas MGAAF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGAAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to MGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check MGAAF's competition here
CLOEF vs UELKY Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, UELKY has a market cap of 968.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while UELKY trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas UELKY's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UELKY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to UELKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check UELKY's competition here
CLOEF vs HCHOF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, HCHOF has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while HCHOF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas HCHOF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCHOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and HCHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHOF's competition here
CLOEF vs RSGUF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, RSGUF has a market cap of 525.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while RSGUF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas RSGUF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSGUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to RSGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check RSGUF's competition here
CLOEF vs PEFDF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, PEFDF has a market cap of 391.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while PEFDF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas PEFDF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEFDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to PEFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check PEFDF's competition here
CLOEF vs QQFSF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, QQFSF has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while QQFSF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas QQFSF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QQFSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to QQFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check QQFSF's competition here
CLOEF vs FVGCF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, FVGCF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while FVGCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas FVGCF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FVGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and FVGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FVGCF's competition here
CLOEF vs RLGDF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, RLGDF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while RLGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas RLGDF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and RLGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLGDF's competition here
CLOEF vs YWGRF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, YWGRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while YWGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas YWGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YWGRF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and YWGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YWGRF's competition here
CLOEF vs GUMYF Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, GUMYF has a market cap of 654.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while GUMYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas GUMYF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUMYF's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and GUMYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUMYF's competition here
CLOEF vs GNGR Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, GNGR has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while GNGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas GNGR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and GNGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNGR's competition here
CLOEF vs EVRN Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, EVRN has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while EVRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas EVRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and EVRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRN's competition here
CLOEF vs HWVI Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, HWVI has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while HWVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas HWVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and HWVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWVI's competition here
CLOEF vs GUMYD Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, GUMYD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while GUMYD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas GUMYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUMYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and GUMYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUMYD's competition here
CLOEF vs ASCS Comparison July 2025
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1B. In comparison, ASCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $3.70, while ASCS trades at $5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.42, whereas ASCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and ASCS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASCS's competition here