Colony Capital, Inc.
Colony Capital, Inc. CLNY Peers
See (CLNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLNY | $8.50 | N/A | 1.36B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VICI | $32.11 | +1.52% | 33.93B | 12.84 | $2.50 | +5.34% |
| WPC | $61.86 | +1.00% | 13.55B | 31.89 | $1.94 | +5.71% |
| EPRT | $32.27 | +0.81% | 6.37B | 27.82 | $1.16 | +3.63% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.08B | 24.42 | $1.76 | N/A |
| GNL-PD | $23.39 | -0.13% | 5.22B | N/A | N/A | +12.68% |
| GNL-PE | $22.61 | +0.04% | 5.05B | N/A | N/A | +12.68% |
| GNL-PB | $21.53 | +0.70% | 4.81B | -158.31 | -$0.14 | +12.68% |
| DBRG-PJ | $22.85 | +6.78% | 4.02B | -30.71 | -$0.74 | +0.34% |
| DBRG-PI | $22.75 | +4.65% | 4.01B | -30.58 | -$0.74 | +0.34% |
Stock Comparison
CLNY vs VICI Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 33.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while VICI trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs WPC Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 13.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while WPC trades at $61.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs EPRT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while EPRT trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SRC Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PD Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 5.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PD trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PE Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 5.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PE trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PB Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 4.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PB trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -158.31. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG-PJ Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG-PJ trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -30.71. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG-PI Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG-PI trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -30.58. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG-PH Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG-PH trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -30.35. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is less volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SRC-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AFINP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AFINO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs BNL Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while BNL trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs PSB-PY Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs RTLPO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs RTLPP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs UE Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while UE trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PA trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -167.28. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CLNC Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs ESRT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while ESRT trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs ALEX Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while ALEX trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AAT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AAT trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AFIN Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SAFE Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SAFE trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs RTL Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GOODN Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GOODN trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -654.85. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR-PG Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR-PI Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR-PD Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AHH Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 748.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AHH trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 73.85. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AHH-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 743.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AHH-PA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 90.91. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs BRSP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 702.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while BRSP trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GOODO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 661.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GOODO trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 717.24. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GOOD Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 659.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GOOD trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CTO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 607.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CTO trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -33.53. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CTO-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 584.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CTO-PA trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs OLP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 528.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while OLP trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs PKST Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 456.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while PKST trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDV-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 248.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDV-PA trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs FVR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 207.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while FVR trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDV Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 147.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDV trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -162.33. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDRR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 27.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDRR trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MKZR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 17.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MKZR trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDRRP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SQFT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 8.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SQFT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GIPR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 8.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GIPR trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SQFTW Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 7.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SQFTW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is less volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SQFTP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 7.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SQFTP trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -25.45. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CORR-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CORR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CORR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GIPRW Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.36B. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 979774.00. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GIPRW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.