Colony Capital, Inc.
Colony Capital, Inc. CLNY Peers
See (CLNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLNY | $8.50 | N/A | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VICI | $32.29 | -0.12% | 34.1B | 12.91 | $2.50 | +5.33% |
| WPC | $63.39 | -0.49% | 13.9B | 32.68 | $1.94 | +5.53% |
| EPRT | $32.36 | -0.86% | 6.4B | 27.90 | $1.16 | +3.60% |
| SRC | $42.98 | +0.63% | 6.1B | 24.42 | $1.76 | N/A |
| GNL-PD | $22.83 | +1.60% | 5.1B | N/A | N/A | +13.66% |
| GNL-PE | $22.09 | -0.09% | 4.9B | N/A | N/A | +13.66% |
| GNL-PB | $21.04 | -0.57% | 4.7B | -154.71 | -$0.14 | +13.66% |
| SRC-PA | $24.26 | +0.46% | 3.8B | 13.55 | $1.79 | N/A |
| DBRG-PI | $21.10 | +0.48% | 3.7B | -28.36 | -$0.74 | +0.40% |
Stock Comparison
CLNY vs VICI Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while VICI trades at $32.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs WPC Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WPC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while WPC trades at $63.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPC's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to WPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to WPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs EPRT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EPRT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while EPRT trades at $32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPRT's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to EPRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to EPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SRC Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SRC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SRC trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PD Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNL-PD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PD trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PE Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNL-PE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PE trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PB Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNL-PB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PB trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PB's P/E ratio is -154.71. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SRC-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SRC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SRC-PA trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRC-PA's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SRC-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SRC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG-PI Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DBRG-PI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG-PI trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG-PI's P/E ratio is -28.36. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG-PI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to DBRG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG-PJ Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DBRG-PJ has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG-PJ trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG-PJ's P/E ratio is -27.98. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to DBRG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG-PH Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DBRG-PH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG-PH trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG-PH's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to DBRG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AFINP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AFINP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AFINP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFINP's P/E ratio is -90.91. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AFINP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AFINP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AFINO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AFINO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AFINO trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFINO's P/E ratio is -90.04. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AFINO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AFINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs BNL Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BNL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while BNL trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNL's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BNL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to BNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs PSB-PY Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSB-PY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while PSB-PY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSB-PY's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PSB-PY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to PSB-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs RTLPO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RTLPO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while RTLPO trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTLPO's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RTLPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to RTLPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs RTLPP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RTLPP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while RTLPP trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTLPP's P/E ratio is -155.63. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RTLPP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to RTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs UE Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while UE trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UE's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to UE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to UE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs DBRG Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DBRG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while DBRG trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBRG's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to DBRG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to DBRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GNL-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GNL-PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GNL-PA trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNL-PA's P/E ratio is -163.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GNL-PA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GNL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs ESRT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ESRT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while ESRT trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESRT's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ESRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to ESRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CLNC Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CLNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CLNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CLNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CLNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs ALEX Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while ALEX trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AAT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AAT trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAT's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AAT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AFIN Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AFIN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AFIN trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFIN's P/E ratio is -28.88. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AFIN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SAFE Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SAFE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SAFE trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFE's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SAFE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SAFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs RTL Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RTL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while RTL trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTL's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to RTL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to RTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GOODN Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOODN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GOODN trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOODN's P/E ratio is -683.24. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GOODN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GOODN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR-PG Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STAR-PG has a market cap of 760.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR-PG trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR-PG's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR-PG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR-PI Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STAR-PI has a market cap of 755.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR-PI's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR-PI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR-PD Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STAR-PD has a market cap of 753.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR-PD trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR-PD's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AHH Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AHH has a market cap of 711.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AHH trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHH's P/E ratio is 70.20. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AHH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs AHH-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AHH-PA has a market cap of 700.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while AHH-PA trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHH-PA's P/E ratio is 90.29. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to AHH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to AHH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs BRSP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BRSP has a market cap of 679.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while BRSP trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRSP's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to BRSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to BRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GOODO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOODO has a market cap of 672.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GOODO trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOODO's P/E ratio is 711.03. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GOODO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GOODO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GOOD Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOOD has a market cap of 665.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GOOD trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOD's P/E ratio is 47.90. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GOOD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STAR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STAR has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STAR trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAR's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STAR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CTO-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTO-PA has a market cap of 619.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CTO-PA trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTO-PA's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CTO-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CTO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CTO Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CTO has a market cap of 594.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CTO trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTO's P/E ratio is -32.80. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs OLP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OLP has a market cap of 538.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while OLP trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLP's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to OLP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to OLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs PKST Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PKST has a market cap of 489.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while PKST trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKST's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PKST's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to PKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDV-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDV-PA has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDV-PA trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDV-PA's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDV-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs FVR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FVR has a market cap of 220.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while FVR trades at $11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVR's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FVR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to FVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDV Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDV trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -162.11. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDRR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDRR has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDRR trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDRR's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDRR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MDRRP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MDRRP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MDRRP trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDRRP's P/E ratio is -127.46. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MDRRP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MDRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SQFTP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SQFTP has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SQFTP trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQFTP's P/E ratio is -25.47. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQFTP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SQFTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MKZR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MKZR has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MKZR trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKZR's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MKZR's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MKZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GIPR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GIPR has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GIPR trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIPR's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GIPR's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SQFT Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SQFT has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SQFT trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQFT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQFT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SQFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CORR-PA Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CORR-PA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CORR-PA trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORR-PA's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CORR-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to CORR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs CORR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CORR has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while CORR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to CORR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is less volatile compared to CORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GIPRW Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GIPRW has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GIPRW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIPRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GIPRW's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is less volatile compared to GIPRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs SQFTW Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SQFTW has a market cap of 36.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while SQFTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQFTW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to SQFTW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to SQFTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs VER-PF Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VER-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while VER-PF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VER-PF's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VER-PF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to VER-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs VER Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while VER trades at $51.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to VER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to VER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs MGP Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while MGP trades at $41.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGP's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to MGP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to MGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs GOODM Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOODM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while GOODM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOODM's P/E ratio is 1042.08. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to GOODM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to GOODM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs PSB Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while PSB trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSB's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PSB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to PSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs PSB-PX Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSB-PX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while PSB-PX trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSB-PX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PSB-PX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to PSB-PX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs PSB-PZ Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSB-PZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while PSB-PZ trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSB-PZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to PSB-PZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to PSB-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs FSPR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FSPR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while FSPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to FSPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to FSPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs STOR Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while STOR trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to STOR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to STOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.
CLNY vs APTS Comparison
CLNY plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLNY stands at 1.4B. In comparison, APTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLNY is priced at $8.50, while APTS trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLNY currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLNY's ROE is -0.34%, compared to APTS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLNY is more volatile compared to APTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLNY.