Chatham Lodging Trust
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDT | $7.11 | +0.99% | 348.8M | 118.67 | $0.06 | +4.49% |
| HST | $16.55 | +0.73% | 11.5B | 17.24 | $0.96 | +5.39% |
| RHP | $99.62 | +0.87% | 6.2B | 21.13 | $4.71 | +4.56% |
| DRH-PA | $25.20 | +0.32% | 5.2B | -227.03 | -$0.11 | +5.16% |
| SHO-PH | $20.95 | -0.29% | 4.2B | 56.62 | $0.37 | +3.96% |
| SHO-PI | $19.87 | +0.15% | 4B | 53.70 | $0.37 | +3.96% |
| APLE | $12.57 | +1.09% | 3B | 15.70 | $0.80 | +8.02% |
| PK | $11.22 | +0.81% | 2.2B | 19.01 | $0.59 | +12.42% |
| PEB-PG | $18.73 | -0.95% | 2.2B | -11.22 | -$1.67 | +0.37% |
| PEB-PH | $17.00 | +0.06% | 2B | -10.12 | -$1.67 | +0.37% |
Stock Comparison
CLDT vs HST Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while HST trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HST's competition here
CLDT vs RHP Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while RHP trades at $99.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check RHP's competition here
CLDT vs DRH-PA Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while DRH-PA trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -227.03. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check DRH-PA's competition here
CLDT vs SHO-PH Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SHO-PH trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 56.62. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SHO-PH's competition here
CLDT vs SHO-PI Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SHO-PI trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SHO-PI's competition here
CLDT vs APLE Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while APLE trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check APLE's competition here
CLDT vs PK Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while PK trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas PK's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT and PK have similar daily volatility (1.97).Check PK's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PG Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while PEB-PG trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PG's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PH Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while PEB-PH trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PH's competition here
CLDT vs INN-PF Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, INN-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while INN-PF trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas INN-PF's P/E ratio is -31.84. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to INN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check INN-PF's competition here
CLDT vs SHO Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SHO trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 90.20. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SHO's competition here
CLDT vs DRH Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while DRH trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check DRH's competition here
CLDT vs XHR Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while XHR trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 60.25. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check XHR's competition here
CLDT vs PEB Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while PEB trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -24.11. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PE Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while PEB-PE trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -11.29. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PE's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PF Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while PEB-PF trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to PEB-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PF's competition here
CLDT vs RLJ Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while RLJ trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check RLJ's competition here
CLDT vs RLJ-PA Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while RLJ-PA trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check RLJ-PA's competition here
CLDT vs CLDT-PA Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, CLDT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while CLDT-PA trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas CLDT-PA's P/E ratio is -27.37. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLDT-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to CLDT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check CLDT-PA's competition here
CLDT vs HT-PE Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT-PE's competition here
CLDT vs HT-PD Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT-PD's competition here
CLDT vs HT-PC Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT-PC's competition here
CLDT vs INN-PE Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 685.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while INN-PE trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -32.23. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check INN-PE's competition here
CLDT vs INN Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 619.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while INN trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas INN's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check INN's competition here
CLDT vs SVC Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 504.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SVC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SVC's competition here
CLDT vs HT Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check HT's competition here
CLDT vs BHR-PB Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 168.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while BHR-PB trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -44.71. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check BHR-PB's competition here
CLDT vs BHR-PD Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 162.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while BHR-PD trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -69.59. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check BHR-PD's competition here
CLDT vs BHR Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while BHR trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check BHR's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PD Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while AHT-PD trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PD's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PH Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while AHT-PH trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PH's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PI Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while AHT-PI trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PI's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PG Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while AHT-PG trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PG's competition here
CLDT vs AHT-PF Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while AHT-PF trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT-PF's competition here
CLDT vs AHT Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while AHT trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check AHT's competition here
CLDT vs SOHON Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SOHON trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHON's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHON's competition here
CLDT vs SOHOO Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SOHOO trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHOO's competition here
CLDT vs SOHOB Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SOHOB trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHOB's competition here
CLDT vs IHT Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while IHT trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check IHT's competition here
CLDT vs SOHO Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while SOHO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHO's ROE of +57.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is less volatile compared to SOHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check SOHO's competition here
CLDT vs CDOR Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, CDOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while CDOR trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas CDOR's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDOR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to CDOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check CDOR's competition here
CLDT vs CPLG Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, CPLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while CPLG trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas CPLG's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPLG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to CPLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check CPLG's competition here
CLDT vs PEB-PD Comparison July 2025
CLDT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT stands at 348.8M. In comparison, PEB-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT is priced at $7.11, while PEB-PD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT currently has a P/E ratio of 118.67, whereas PEB-PD's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT is more volatile compared to PEB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT.Check PEB-PD's competition here