Chatham Lodging Trust
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLDT-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDT-PA | $20.44 | -0.02% | 989.9M | -27.32 | -$0.75 | +4.81% |
| HST | $20.07 | +0.00% | 14B | 19.25 | $1.06 | +4.66% |
| RHP | $103.06 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 27.72 | $3.78 | +4.45% |
| DRH-PA | $24.99 | +0.04% | 5.1B | -225.14 | -$0.11 | +4.03% |
| SHO-PH | $21.49 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 58.35 | $0.37 | +3.84% |
| RLJ-PA | $25.54 | +0.00% | 3.9B | -15.64 | -$1.63 | +7.33% |
| SHO-PI | $20.07 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 54.46 | $0.37 | +3.84% |
| APLE | $12.24 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 16.70 | $0.74 | +7.81% |
| PEB-PG | $20.84 | +0.00% | 2.4B | -12.30 | -$1.67 | +0.32% |
| PK | $11.42 | +0.00% | 2.2B | -140.62 | -$0.08 | +8.91% |
Stock Comparison
CLDT-PA vs HST Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while HST trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HST's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RHP Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while RHP trades at $103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RHP's competition here
CLDT-PA vs DRH-PA Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while DRH-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -225.14. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check DRH-PA's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO-PH Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SHO-PH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RLJ-PA Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while RLJ-PA trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RLJ-PA's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO-PI Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SHO-PI trades at $20.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO-PI's competition here
CLDT-PA vs APLE Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while APLE trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check APLE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PG Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while PEB-PG trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PG's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PK Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while PK trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas PK's P/E ratio is -140.62. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PK's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PH Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while PEB-PH trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs DRH Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while DRH trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 38.19. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check DRH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN-PE Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while INN-PE trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -32.52. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SHO trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 470.00. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs XHR Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while XHR trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check XHR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while PEB trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RLJ Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while RLJ trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 164.50. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RLJ's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PE Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while PEB-PE trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -12.30. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PF Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while PEB-PF trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and PEB-PF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEB-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PE Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PD Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PC Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 471.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while INN trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas INN's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHOO Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 385.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SOHOO trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHOO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHOB Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 376.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SOHOB trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHOB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CLDT Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, CLDT has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while CLDT trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas CLDT's P/E ratio is 746.50. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to CLDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CLDT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SVC Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SVC trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SVC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN-PF Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, INN-PF has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while INN-PF trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas INN-PF's P/E ratio is -31.51. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INN-PF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and INN-PF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INN-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHON Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 336.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SOHON trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHON's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHON's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while BHR trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR-PB Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while BHR-PB trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -55.54. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR-PB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR-PD Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while BHR-PD trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -56.22. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PD Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while AHT-PD trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PF Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while AHT-PF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PH Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while AHT-PH trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PG Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while AHT-PG trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PG's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PI Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while AHT-PI trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PI's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHO Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while SOHO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA and SOHO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while AHT trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHT's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs IHT Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while IHT trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check IHT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CDOR Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, CDOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while CDOR trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas CDOR's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CDOR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to CDOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CDOR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CPLG Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, CPLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while CPLG trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas CPLG's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPLG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to CPLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CPLG's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PD Comparison February 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 989.9M. In comparison, PEB-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $20.44, while PEB-PD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.32, whereas PEB-PD's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PEB-PD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PD's competition here