Chatham Lodging Trust
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLDT-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Hotel & Motel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLDT-PA | $19.75 | -1.59% | 965.2M | -26.44 | -$0.75 | +4.65% |
| HST | $19.14 | +0.21% | 13.2B | 17.40 | $1.10 | +4.97% |
| RHP | $92.91 | +0.52% | 5.9B | 24.64 | $3.77 | +5.07% |
| DRH-PA | $24.99 | +0.04% | 5.1B | -225.14 | -$0.11 | +3.94% |
| SHO-PH | $20.42 | +0.59% | 3.9B | 55.19 | $0.37 | +3.99% |
| RLJ-PA | $24.46 | +0.53% | 3.7B | -15.00 | -$1.63 | +8.14% |
| SHO-PI | $19.28 | +0.16% | 3.7B | 52.11 | $0.37 | +3.99% |
| APLE | $11.53 | -0.17% | 2.7B | 15.59 | $0.74 | +8.31% |
| PEB-PG | $19.70 | +0.51% | 2.3B | -11.80 | -$1.67 | +0.31% |
| PK | $10.40 | +0.19% | 2.1B | -7.26 | -$1.43 | +9.59% |
Stock Comparison
CLDT-PA vs HST Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, HST has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while HST trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas HST's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HST's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to HST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HST's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RHP Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, RHP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while RHP trades at $92.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas RHP's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to RHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RHP's competition here
CLDT-PA vs DRH-PA Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, DRH-PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while DRH-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas DRH-PA's P/E ratio is -225.14. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRH-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to DRH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check DRH-PA's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO-PH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SHO-PH has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SHO-PH trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SHO-PH's P/E ratio is 55.19. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHO-PH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to SHO-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RLJ-PA Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, RLJ-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while RLJ-PA trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas RLJ-PA's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RLJ-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to RLJ-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RLJ-PA's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO-PI Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SHO-PI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SHO-PI trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SHO-PI's P/E ratio is 52.11. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHO-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to SHO-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO-PI's competition here
CLDT-PA vs APLE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, APLE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while APLE trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas APLE's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APLE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to APLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check APLE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PG Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, PEB-PG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while PEB-PG trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas PEB-PG's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to PEB-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PG's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PK Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, PK has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while PK trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas PK's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PK's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, PEB-PH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while PEB-PH trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas PEB-PH's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to PEB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs DRH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, DRH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while DRH trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas DRH's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to DRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check DRH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN-PE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, INN-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while INN-PE trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas INN-PE's P/E ratio is -30.38. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INN-PE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to INN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SHO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SHO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SHO trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SHO's P/E ratio is 225.13. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to SHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, PEB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while PEB trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas PEB's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to PEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs XHR Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, XHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while XHR trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas XHR's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to XHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check XHR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PF Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, PEB-PF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while PEB-PF trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas PEB-PF's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to PEB-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, PEB-PE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while PEB-PE trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas PEB-PE's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to PEB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs RLJ Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, RLJ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while RLJ trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas RLJ's P/E ratio is 733.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RLJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to RLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check RLJ's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PE Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, HT-PE has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while HT-PE trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas HT-PE's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to HT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PE's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, HT-PD has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while HT-PD trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas HT-PD's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT-PD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to HT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT-PC Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, HT-PC has a market cap of 722.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while HT-PC trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas HT-PC's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT-PC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to HT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT-PC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs HT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, HT has a market cap of 482.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while HT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas HT's P/E ratio is 66.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to HT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check HT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, INN has a market cap of 476M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while INN trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas INN's P/E ratio is -19.89. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to INN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CLDT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, CLDT has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while CLDT trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas CLDT's P/E ratio is 56.71. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLDT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to CLDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CLDT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHON Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SOHON has a market cap of 326.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SOHON trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SOHON's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHON's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHON's competition here
CLDT-PA vs INN-PF Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, INN-PF has a market cap of 323.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while INN-PF trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas INN-PF's P/E ratio is -29.59. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INN-PF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to INN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check INN-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHOB Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SOHOB has a market cap of 307.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SOHOB trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SOHOB's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHOB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHOB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHOO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SOHOO has a market cap of 297.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SOHOO trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SOHOO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHOO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SOHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHOO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SVC Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SVC has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SVC trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SVC's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to SVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SVC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR-PB Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, BHR-PB has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while BHR-PB trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas BHR-PB's P/E ratio is -49.09. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHR-PB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR-PB's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, BHR has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while BHR trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas BHR's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to BHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs BHR-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, BHR-PD has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while BHR-PD trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas BHR-PD's P/E ratio is -56.84. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHR-PD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to BHR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check BHR-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs SOHO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, SOHO has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while SOHO trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas SOHO's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOHO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to SOHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check SOHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, AHT-PD has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while AHT-PD trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas AHT-PD's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PD's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PF Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, AHT-PF has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while AHT-PF trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas AHT-PF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PF's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PI Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, AHT-PI has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while AHT-PI trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas AHT-PI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PI's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, AHT-PH has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while AHT-PH trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas AHT-PH's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PH's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT-PG Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, AHT-PG has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while AHT-PG trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas AHT-PG's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT-PG's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT-PG's competition here
CLDT-PA vs AHT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, AHT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while AHT trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas AHT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to AHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check AHT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs IHT Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, IHT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while IHT trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas IHT's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IHT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to IHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check IHT's competition here
CLDT-PA vs LHO Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, LHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while LHO trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas LHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LHO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is less volatile compared to LHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check LHO's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CDOR Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, CDOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while CDOR trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas CDOR's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDOR's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to CDOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CDOR's competition here
CLDT-PA vs MHGC Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, MHGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while MHGC trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas MHGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MHGC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to MHGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check MHGC's competition here
CLDT-PA vs FCH Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, FCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while FCH trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas FCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to FCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check FCH's competition here
CLDT-PA vs PEB-PD Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, PEB-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while PEB-PD trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas PEB-PD's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEB-PD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to PEB-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check PEB-PD's competition here
CLDT-PA vs CPLG Comparison April 2026
CLDT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLDT-PA stands at 965.2M. In comparison, CPLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLDT-PA is priced at $19.75, while CPLG trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLDT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -26.44, whereas CPLG's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, CLDT-PA's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPLG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDT-PA is more volatile compared to CPLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDT-PA.Check CPLG's competition here