Cortland Bancorp

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 185.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HDB trades at $72.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 69.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while PNC trades at $175.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 68.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while USB trades at $44.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while USB-PS trades at $18.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 65.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while ITUB trades at $6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 65.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while USB-PA trades at $846.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 241.03. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 65.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while USB-PP trades at $22.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 64.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while USB-PH trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 64.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while MFG trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 59.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while IBN trades at $33.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 57.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while LYG trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 53.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while TFC trades at $41.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -216.47. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 53.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while DB trades at $27.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BSBR trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HBANL trades at $25.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HBANM trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 30.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while TFC-PI trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while MTB trades at $184.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while TFC-PO trades at $21.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BBD trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FITB trades at $39.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HBANP trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 26.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FCNCA trades at $1,940.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 25.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BBDO trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while USB-PR trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 25.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while KB trades at $66.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while TFC-PR trades at $18.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FCNCP trades at $21.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FCNCO trades at $22.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while USB-PQ trades at $15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HBAN trades at $15.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while RF-PF trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 20.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while RF trades at $22.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while RF-PC trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 18.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while KEY trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -86.79. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 18.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CFG trades at $41.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while KEY-PL trades at $24.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 16.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 16.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while KEY-PK trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FITBI trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 16.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while KEY-PI trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FITBP trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BAP trades at $202.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while SHG trades at $31.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while RF-PE trades at $17.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BCH trades at $30.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FITBO trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FHN-PB trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FHN-PC trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CFG-PH trades at $26.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FHN-PE trades at $23.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CIB trades at $40.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FHN trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while GGAL trades at $61.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while WF trades at $38.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while SSB trades at $91.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FHN-PF trades at $17.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while WBS trades at $52.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CBSH trades at $65.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while WAL trades at $79.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while PNFP trades at $110.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CFG-PE trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CFR trades at $130.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while ONB trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while UMBF trades at $107.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while WTFC trades at $121.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while ONBPO trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while ONBPP trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while WTFCM trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CMA trades at $58.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while ZION trades at $49.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BPOP trades at $103.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while PB trades at $73.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while SNV trades at $49.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while SNV-PD trades at $24.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BOKF trades at $98.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while CADE trades at $32.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HOMB trades at $29.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BMA trades at $92.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while COLB trades at $25.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while UBSI trades at $37.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while OZK trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FFIN trades at $36.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FLG trades at $12.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while FNB trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while VLY trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while GBCI trades at $44.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while VLYPP trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HWC trades at $57.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while VLYPO trades at $25.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while HWCPZ trades at $24.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while AUB trades at $31.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while NYCB trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while BBAR trades at $21.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.

CLDB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CLDB stands at N/A. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CLDB is priced at $28.47, while ABCB trades at $62.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CLDB currently has a P/E ratio of 12.30, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, CLDB's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLDB is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLDB.