China Industrial Group, Inc.
China Industrial Group, Inc. (CIND) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CIND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIND | $0.00 | +0.00% | 57.6K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HNNMY | $2.59 | -1.89% | 111.5B | 20.06 | $0.13 | +5.04% |
| HMRZF | $13.93 | -3.26% | 22.4B | 21.43 | $0.65 | +4.67% |
| MONRY | $54.26 | +1.06% | 15B | 20.76 | $2.62 | +2.71% |
| MONRF | $55.04 | +0.00% | 14.9B | 21.01 | $2.62 | +2.66% |
| SZHIF | $7.65 | +0.00% | 11.5B | 15.61 | $0.49 | +4.25% |
| TRYIY | $13.83 | +0.73% | 10.8B | 21.02 | $0.66 | +1.00% |
| SHZHY | $7.03 | -1.54% | 10.6B | 12.12 | $0.58 | +4.62% |
| TRYIF | $6.63 | +0.00% | 10.4B | 20.09 | $0.33 | +1.84% |
| LPPSY | $20.41 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 18.39 | $1.11 | +1.10% |
Stock Comparison
CIND vs HNNMY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, HNNMY has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while HNNMY trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HNNMY's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to HNNMY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to HNNMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check HNNMY's competition here
CIND vs HMRZF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, HMRZF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while HMRZF trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMRZF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to HMRZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to HMRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check HMRZF's competition here
CIND vs MONRY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, MONRY has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while MONRY trades at $54.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONRY's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to MONRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check MONRY's competition here
CIND vs MONRF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, MONRF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while MONRF trades at $55.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONRF's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to MONRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to MONRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check MONRF's competition here
CIND vs SZHIF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SZHIF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SZHIF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SZHIF's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SZHIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SZHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SZHIF's competition here
CIND vs TRYIY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TRYIY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TRYIY trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRYIY's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to TRYIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check TRYIY's competition here
CIND vs SHZHY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SHZHY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SHZHY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHZHY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SHZHY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SHZHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SHZHY's competition here
CIND vs TRYIF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TRYIF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TRYIF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRYIF's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TRYIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to TRYIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check TRYIF's competition here
CIND vs LPPSY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, LPPSY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while LPPSY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPPSY's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to LPPSY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to LPPSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check LPPSY's competition here
CIND vs BSDGY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, BSDGY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while BSDGY trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSDGY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to BSDGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check BSDGY's competition here
CIND vs BSDGF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, BSDGF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while BSDGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSDGF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to BSDGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to BSDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check BSDGF's competition here
CIND vs RYPPF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, RYPPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while RYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to RYPPF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is less volatile compared to RYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check RYPPF's competition here
CIND vs BOSSY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, BOSSY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while BOSSY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOSSY's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to BOSSY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to BOSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check BOSSY's competition here
CIND vs CGGGF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, CGGGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while CGGGF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGGGF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to CGGGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to CGGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check CGGGF's competition here
CIND vs WACLY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, WACLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while WACLY trades at $166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WACLY's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to WACLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check WACLY's competition here
CIND vs DELTF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, DELTF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while DELTF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELTF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to DELTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to DELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check DELTF's competition here
CIND vs JNBYF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, JNBYF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while JNBYF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNBYF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to JNBYF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to JNBYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check JNBYF's competition here
CIND vs SERNF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SERNF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SERNF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SERNF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SERNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SERNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SERNF's competition here
CIND vs WACLF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, WACLF has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while WACLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WACLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to WACLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to WACLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check WACLF's competition here
CIND vs TSIHF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TSIHF has a market cap of 568.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TSIHF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSIHF's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TSIHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to TSIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check TSIHF's competition here
CIND vs MKKOF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, MKKOF has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while MKKOF trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKKOF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to MKKOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to MKKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check MKKOF's competition here
CIND vs JWTXF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, JWTXF has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while JWTXF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWTXF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to JWTXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to JWTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check JWTXF's competition here
CIND vs VDEVF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, VDEVF has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while VDEVF trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDEVF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to VDEVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to VDEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check VDEVF's competition here
CIND vs CDGXY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, CDGXY has a market cap of 328.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while CDGXY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDGXY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to CDGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check CDGXY's competition here
CIND vs CDGXF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, CDGXF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while CDGXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDGXF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to CDGXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to CDGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check CDGXF's competition here
CIND vs WQTEF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, WQTEF has a market cap of 167.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while WQTEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQTEF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to WQTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to WQTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check WQTEF's competition here
CIND vs ECNLF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, ECNLF has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while ECNLF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECNLF's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to ECNLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to ECNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check ECNLF's competition here
CIND vs CHRLF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, CHRLF has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while CHRLF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to CHRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to CHRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check CHRLF's competition here
CIND vs TFRFF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TFRFF has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TFRFF trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFRFF's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TFRFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to TFRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check TFRFF's competition here
CIND vs NLLGF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, NLLGF has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while NLLGF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLLGF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to NLLGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to NLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check NLLGF's competition here
CIND vs TAPCF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TAPCF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TAPCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAPCF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TAPCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to TAPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check TAPCF's competition here
CIND vs IFABF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, IFABF has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while IFABF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFABF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to IFABF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to IFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check IFABF's competition here
CIND vs USYNF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, USYNF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while USYNF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USYNF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to USYNF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to USYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check USYNF's competition here
CIND vs TUGHF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TUGHF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TUGHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUGHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TUGHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to TUGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check TUGHF's competition here
CIND vs SEPGY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SEPGY has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SEPGY trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPGY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGY's ROE of -6.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SEPGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SEPGY's competition here
CIND vs TALN Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TALN has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TALN trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TALN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TALN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to TALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check TALN's competition here
CIND vs SEPGF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SEPGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SEPGF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEPGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SEPGF's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SEPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SEPGF's competition here
CIND vs AVLP Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, AVLP has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while AVLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to AVLP's ROE of +2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to AVLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check AVLP's competition here
CIND vs AHRO Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, AHRO has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while AHRO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to AHRO's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to AHRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check AHRO's competition here
CIND vs JLMC Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, JLMC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while JLMC trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLMC's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to JLMC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to JLMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check JLMC's competition here
CIND vs PBBSF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, PBBSF has a market cap of 907.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while PBBSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBBSF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to PBBSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to PBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check PBBSF's competition here
CIND vs CGAC Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, CGAC has a market cap of 743.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while CGAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to CGAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check CGAC's competition here
CIND vs SKFG Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SKFG has a market cap of 477.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SKFG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKFG's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SKFG's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SKFG's competition here
CIND vs BLFR Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, BLFR has a market cap of 179.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while BLFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLFR's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to BLFR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to BLFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check BLFR's competition here
CIND vs CRTL Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, CRTL has a market cap of 143.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while CRTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to CRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check CRTL's competition here
CIND vs SUUB Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SUUB has a market cap of 81.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SUUB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUUB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SUUB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SUUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SUUB's competition here
CIND vs AGNY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, AGNY has a market cap of 72K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while AGNY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNY's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to AGNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to AGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check AGNY's competition here
CIND vs OMVE Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, OMVE has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while OMVE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMVE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to OMVE's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND and OMVE have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check OMVE's competition here
CIND vs LYJN Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, LYJN has a market cap of 9.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while LYJN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYJN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to LYJN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to LYJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check LYJN's competition here
CIND vs TRUA Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, TRUA has a market cap of 6.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while TRUA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to TRUA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND and TRUA have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check TRUA's competition here
CIND vs EDSFF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, EDSFF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while EDSFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDSFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to EDSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND and EDSFF have similar daily volatility (196.04).Check EDSFF's competition here
CIND vs APPM Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, APPM has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while APPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to APPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to APPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check APPM's competition here
CIND vs IBGR Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, IBGR has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while IBGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBGR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to IBGR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to IBGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check IBGR's competition here
CIND vs LZENF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, LZENF has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while LZENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZENF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to LZENF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to LZENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check LZENF's competition here
CIND vs SSTU Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SSTU has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SSTU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SSTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SSTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SSTU's competition here
CIND vs SUFF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, SUFF has a market cap of 69. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while SUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to SUFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to SUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check SUFF's competition here
CIND vs GLLHF Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, GLLHF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while GLLHF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLLHF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to GLLHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to GLLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check GLLHF's competition here
CIND vs WLFDY Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, WLFDY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while WLFDY trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLFDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to WLFDY's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to WLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check WLFDY's competition here
CIND vs JKRO Comparison August 2025
CIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIND stands at 57.6K. In comparison, JKRO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIND is priced at $0.00, while JKRO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIND currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JKRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIND's ROE is N/A, compared to JKRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CIND is more volatile compared to JKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIND.Check JKRO's competition here