Capital Limited
Capital Limited CILLF Peers
See (CILLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CILLF | $1.20 | +0.00% | 232.4M | 10.91 | $0.11 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.30 | -0.24% | 128.4B | 11.29 | $2.24 | +4.90% |
| RTPPF | $59.40 | +2.59% | 101.4B | 8.40 | $7.07 | +6.74% |
| RTNTF | $72.26 | -1.31% | 100.8B | 10.22 | $7.07 | +3.25% |
| GLCNF | $4.05 | +0.00% | 49.6B | -32.11 | -$0.13 | +4.31% |
| GLNCY | $8.06 | +0.88% | 49.1B | -31.69 | -$0.26 | +4.14% |
| GMBXF | $6.10 | +1.79% | 47.7B | 12.77 | $0.48 | +3.04% |
| AAUKF | $30.70 | +3.54% | 33.1B | -10.70 | -$2.87 | +2.37% |
| NGLOY | $14.78 | +0.47% | 33B | -10.62 | -$1.44 | +2.18% |
| FSUMF | $10.77 | +0.19% | 32.7B | 8.45 | $1.26 | +8.31% |
Stock Comparison
CILLF vs BHPLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while BHPLF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and BHPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs RTPPF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while RTPPF trades at $59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs RTNTF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 100.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while RTNTF trades at $72.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs GLCNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while GLCNF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -32.11. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs GLNCY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while GLNCY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -31.69. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs GMBXF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while GMBXF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs AAUKF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while AAUKF trades at $30.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs NGLOY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while NGLOY trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs FSUMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while FSUMF trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs FSUGY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while FSUGY trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs CMCLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while CMCLF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs TCKRF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs IPOAF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while IPOAF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs IVPAF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while IVPAF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs BOLIF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs BDNNY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while BDNNY trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs SHTLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while SHTLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs JXMNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and JXMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs SMMYY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while SMMYY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs ABML Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs STMNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while STMNF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 58.54. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs PUTKF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs LYSDY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while LYSDY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 135.13. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs LYSCF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while LYSCF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 177.25. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs PUTKY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PUTKY trades at $26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs NILSY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs PAEKY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs PILBF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PILBF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -99.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and PILBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MALRY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MALRY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs FLMMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs CHZQ Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MALRF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs NGXXF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while NGXXF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -42.60. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs PTNDY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs IIDDY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while IIDDY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs IPGDF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while IPGDF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MIMTF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MIMTF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs DWMNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs NICMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs AZZVF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs AFBOF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs SOUHY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while SOUHY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.08. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs ERMAY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ERMAY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 99.17. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs PTNDF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs ERMAF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ERMAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 91.53. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs ALMTF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ALMTF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -40.50. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs DETRF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while DETRF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs ADTLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ADTLF trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs ADMLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ADMLF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs ILKAY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ILKAY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs AZRMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs ILKAF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ILKAF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs LINRF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while LINRF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -45.65. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and LINRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs BQSSF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while BQSSF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.25. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs MFRVF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and MFRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs TAOFF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 973.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while TAOFF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs STTSY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and STTSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs FMCXF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 915.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while FMCXF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -54.27. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs ATUSF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 913.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ATUSF trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs AUSDF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs AFMJF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while AFMJF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs AMVMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 806.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while AMVMF trades at $26.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -65.76. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs VULNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 599.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while VULNF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs CTJHF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and CTJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs NCKAF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and NCKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MJDLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 536.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MJDLF trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs TTNNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and TTNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs OSTTF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and OSTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs PXMFF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MNXMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 470.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MNXMF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -73.10. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MCRZF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs MCHHF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 464.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MCHHF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs FGOVF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while FGOVF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -85.86. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs CGMLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 439.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while CGMLF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -28.25. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs BIRNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and BIRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs VTMXF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, VTMXF has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while VTMXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas VTMXF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to VTMXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and VTMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs FWEDF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 395.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while FWEDF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs KMRPF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while KMRPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and KMRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs REEMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while REEMF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.92. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs ERLFF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 383.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ERLFF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -36.98. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs NQMIY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MLYF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs CREQF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while CREQF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs CTJHY Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MLXEF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 331.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MLXEF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs PMETF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 324.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while PMETF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -66.67. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs ARAFF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 321.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and ARAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs SVMLF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while SVMLF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs LTSRF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs BSSMF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs EMOTF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while EMOTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -26.25. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs JMXXF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while JMXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and JMXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs SLGGF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 270.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while SLGGF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs LRSRF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs MGMNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 260.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MGMNF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CILLF.
CILLF vs ERDCF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 257.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while ERDCF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -70.48. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and ERDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs STQNF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs NOURF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, NOURF has a market cap of 250.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while NOURF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas NOURF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NOURF's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and NOURF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CILLF vs MMILF Comparison
CILLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CILLF stands at 232.4M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CILLF is priced at $1.20, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CILLF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.91, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CILLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CILLF and MMILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).