iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF CIF.TO Peers
See (CIF.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIF.TO | CA$52.76 | -0.88% | 624.3M | 14.13 | CA$3.74 | +2.93% |
| IGAF.TO | CA$15.60 | +0.39% | 3.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.85% |
| TEC.TO | CA$47.54 | -1.04% | 3.1B | 37.76 | CA$1.27 | +0.11% |
| XGD.TO | CA$32.60 | +5.88% | 1.8B | 21.21 | CA$1.50 | +0.76% |
| TGED.TO | CA$27.58 | -1.01% | 1.1B | 31.35 | CA$0.89 | +3.78% |
| DXG.TO | CA$71.71 | -1.61% | 751.2M | 32.57 | CA$2.24 | +11.25% |
| FSF.TO | CA$33.34 | +0.18% | 580.1M | N/A | N/A | +1.23% |
| XHC.TO | CA$62.20 | +0.97% | 496.7M | 23.42 | CA$2.61 | +4.70% |
| XDG.TO | CA$27.98 | +0.00% | 483.8M | 17.51 | CA$1.60 | +3.30% |
| TQGD.TO | CA$21.20 | +0.14% | 383.3M | 15.05 | CA$1.41 | +3.53% |
Stock Comparison
CIF.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while IGAF.TO trades at CA$15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to IGAF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while TEC.TO trades at CA$47.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while XGD.TO trades at CA$32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while TGED.TO trades at CA$27.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while DXG.TO trades at CA$71.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 580.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while FSF.TO trades at CA$33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to FSF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 496.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while XHC.TO trades at CA$62.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs XDG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 483.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while XDG.TO trades at CA$27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while TQGD.TO trades at CA$21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while CINF.TO trades at CA$29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to CINF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at CA$13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 306M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while CWW.TO trades at CA$62.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 261.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while ZWG.TO trades at CA$31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs COW.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while COW.TO trades at CA$67.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 230.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at CA$23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while CGR.TO trades at CA$30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while VMO.TO trades at CA$69.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 177.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while GDV.TO trades at CA$11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 172.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while LIFE.TO trades at CA$18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while ZGD.TO trades at CA$163.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while CYH.TO trades at CA$23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while XGI.TO trades at CA$60.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to XGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while CGLO.TO trades at CA$30.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while PMNT.TO trades at CA$18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to PMNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while XMY.TO trades at CA$32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to XMY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while XDGH.TO trades at CA$27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while TGRE.TO trades at CA$15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while XCD.TO trades at CA$59.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while LONG.TO trades at CA$36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to LONG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while VVO.TO trades at CA$39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to VVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while ONEQ.TO trades at CA$45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to ONEQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while GIQG.TO trades at CA$31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to GIQG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at CA$13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while ESGG.TO trades at CA$52.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while TGGR.TO trades at CA$28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while DXN.TO trades at CA$23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs ZMT.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, ZMT.TO has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while ZMT.TO trades at CA$78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas ZMT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to ZMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while VAH.TO trades at CA$28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while CGAA.TO trades at CA$28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to CGAA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at CA$38.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while PINV.TO trades at CA$24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to PINV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while HGGG.TO trades at CA$51.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to HGGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while MIVG.TO trades at CA$37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to MIVG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while SOL.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs RWU.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while RWU.TO trades at CA$20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to RWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while VLQ.TO trades at CA$32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to VLQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while FLGD.TO trades at CA$29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to FLGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while RIG.TO trades at CA$18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to RIG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while HRA.TO trades at CA$10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs RLD.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while RLD.TO trades at CA$24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to RLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while EATS.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs SHZ.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, SHZ.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while SHZ.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to SHZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while DFD.TO trades at CA$21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to DFD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while HLTH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to HLTH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while DFE.TO trades at CA$17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to DFE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while RLE.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs HGM.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while HGM.TO trades at CA$11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to HGM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs PSY.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, PSY.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while PSY.TO trades at CA$30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas PSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to PSY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.
CIF.TO vs PXG.TO Comparison
CIF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CIF.TO stands at 624.3M. In comparison, PXG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CIF.TO is priced at CA$52.76, while PXG.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CIF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.13, whereas PXG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CIF.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CIF.TO is more volatile compared to PXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CIF.TO.