Cogstate Limited (CGS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGS.AX | A$2.69 | -3.24% | 463.8M | 28.75 | A$0.09 | +0.73% |
| PME.AX | A$205.15 | +3.90% | 21.3B | 90.29 | A$2.25 | +0.30% |
| AYA.AX | A$5.99 | +12.59% | 694.2M | -34.54 | -A$0.18 | N/A |
| VHT.AX | A$1.15 | +0.44% | 291.3M | -28.63 | -A$0.04 | N/A |
| ALC.AX | A$0.11 | +10.53% | 141.1M | 308.82 | A$0.00 | N/A |
| ONE.AX | A$0.14 | -6.90% | 123.2M | -6.52 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| SHG.AX | A$0.20 | +5.26% | 70.7M | -11.00 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| M7T.AX | A$0.29 | +1.75% | 68.2M | -6.88 | -A$0.04 | N/A |
| DOC.AX | A$0.13 | +0.00% | 44M | -5.00 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| BMT.AX | A$0.15 | -3.23% | 40.7M | -6.63 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CGS.AX vs PME.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, PME.AX has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while PME.AX trades at A$205.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas PME.AX's P/E ratio is 90.29. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PME.AX's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to PME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check PME.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs AYA.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, AYA.AX has a market cap of 694.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while AYA.AX trades at A$5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas AYA.AX's P/E ratio is -34.54. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AYA.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to AYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check AYA.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs VHT.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, VHT.AX has a market cap of 291.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while VHT.AX trades at A$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas VHT.AX's P/E ratio is -28.63. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VHT.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to VHT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check VHT.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs ALC.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, ALC.AX has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while ALC.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas ALC.AX's P/E ratio is 308.82. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ALC.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to ALC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check ALC.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs ONE.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, ONE.AX has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while ONE.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas ONE.AX's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ONE.AX's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to ONE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check ONE.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs SHG.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, SHG.AX has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while SHG.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas SHG.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHG.AX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to SHG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check SHG.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs M7T.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, M7T.AX has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while M7T.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas M7T.AX's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to M7T.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to M7T.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check M7T.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs DOC.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, DOC.AX has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while DOC.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas DOC.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DOC.AX's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to DOC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check DOC.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs BMT.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, BMT.AX has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while BMT.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas BMT.AX's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMT.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to BMT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check BMT.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs COO.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, COO.AX has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while COO.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas COO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to COO.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to COO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check COO.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs TRI.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, TRI.AX has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while TRI.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas TRI.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRI.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to TRI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check TRI.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs PKY.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, PKY.AX has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while PKY.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas PKY.AX's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PKY.AX's ROE of -11.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to PKY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check PKY.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs EMD.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, EMD.AX has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while EMD.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas EMD.AX's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EMD.AX's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to EMD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check EMD.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs PCK.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, PCK.AX has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while PCK.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas PCK.AX's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCK.AX's ROE of -10.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to PCK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check PCK.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs RHT.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, RHT.AX has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while RHT.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas RHT.AX's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RHT.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to RHT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check RHT.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs IME.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, IME.AX has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while IME.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas IME.AX's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IME.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to IME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check IME.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs VHL.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, VHL.AX has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while VHL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas VHL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VHL.AX's ROE of -4.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to VHL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check VHL.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs 1ST.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, 1ST.AX has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while 1ST.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas 1ST.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to 1ST.AX's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to 1ST.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check 1ST.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs MDR.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, MDR.AX has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while MDR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas MDR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MDR.AX's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to MDR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check MDR.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs ICR.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, ICR.AX has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while ICR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas ICR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ICR.AX's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to ICR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check ICR.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs OPL.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, OPL.AX has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while OPL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas OPL.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPL.AX's ROE of +12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to OPL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check OPL.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs VFX.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, VFX.AX has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while VFX.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas VFX.AX's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VFX.AX's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to VFX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check VFX.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs MEB.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, MEB.AX has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while MEB.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas MEB.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MEB.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to MEB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check MEB.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs ENL.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, ENL.AX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while ENL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas ENL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ENL.AX's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to ENL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check ENL.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs HIQ.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, HIQ.AX has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while HIQ.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas HIQ.AX's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HIQ.AX's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is less volatile compared to HIQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check HIQ.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs TD1.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, TD1.AX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while TD1.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas TD1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TD1.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to TD1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check TD1.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs OAK.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, OAK.AX has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while OAK.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas OAK.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OAK.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to OAK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check OAK.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs JTL.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, JTL.AX has a market cap of 281.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while JTL.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas JTL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JTL.AX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to JTL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check JTL.AX's competition here
CGS.AX vs TTB.AX Comparison July 2026
CGS.AX plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGS.AX stands at 463.8M. In comparison, TTB.AX has a market cap of 267.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CGS.AX is priced at A$2.69, while TTB.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 28.75, whereas TTB.AX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CGS.AX's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TTB.AX's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGS.AX is more volatile compared to TTB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGS.AX.Check TTB.AX's competition here