CannaGrow Holdings, Inc
CannaGrow Holdings, Inc CGRW Peers
See (CGRW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGRW | $0.02 | +7.39% | 2.23M | -0.01 | -$1.87 | N/A |
| WTKWY | $175.69 | -0.89% | 41.18B | 34.38 | $5.11 | +0.58% |
| WOLTF | $174.33 | -1.64% | 40.86B | 34.32 | $5.08 | +0.53% |
| BXBLY | $27.69 | +1.21% | 18.97B | 23.27 | $1.19 | +2.73% |
| BMBLF | $13.45 | -2.60% | 18.43B | 22.42 | $0.60 | +3.06% |
| DNPCF | $30.50 | +100.00% | 14.98B | 18.26 | $1.67 | +0.85% |
| IKTSY | $66.12 | -0.41% | 10.54B | 23.36 | $2.83 | +2.48% |
| RKLIF | $4.05 | +0.75% | 10.18B | 25.31 | $0.16 | +2.91% |
| IKTSF | $63.08 | N/A | 10.06B | 22.29 | $2.83 | +2.61% |
| SDXOF | $66.77 | +4.79% | 9.77B | 12.91 | $5.17 | +16.26% |
Stock Comparison
CGRW vs WTKWY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 41.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while WTKWY trades at $175.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs WOLTF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 40.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while WOLTF trades at $174.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs BXBLY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 18.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while BXBLY trades at $27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs BMBLF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while BMBLF trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to BMBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs DNPCF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 14.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while DNPCF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs IKTSY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 10.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while IKTSY trades at $66.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs RKLIF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while RKLIF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to RKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs IKTSF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 10.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while IKTSF trades at $63.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SDXOF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 9.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SDXOF trades at $66.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SDXAY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 9.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SDXAY trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs TONPF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while TONPF trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs TOPPY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while TOPPY trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs INPOY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while INPOY trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs DNPLY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while DNPLY trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs TLPFY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while TLPFY trades at $54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs TLPFF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while TLPFF trades at $102.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ELSSF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ELSSF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs INPOF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while INPOF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to INPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ISFFF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ISFFF trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs MITFY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while MITFY trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs MITFF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while MITFF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SCGPY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SCGPY trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to SCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SECCF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SECCF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to SECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ACENY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ACENY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ACENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs RELOF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while RELOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is -68.89. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to RELOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs APLUF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while APLUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to APLUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ISSDY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs TCLAF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while TCLAF trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to TCLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs IPHLF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while IPHLF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs TCLCF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while TCLCF trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to TCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs JSVGF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 850.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to JSVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs STGXF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 837.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while STGXF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to STGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs RKSLF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 590.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while RKSLF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 67.87. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs GLCDF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 539.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs GDIFF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 509.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while GDIFF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to GDIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ITEPF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to ITEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs IRMTF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 385.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while IRMTF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs HZNOF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 384.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while HZNOF trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs VSSPY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 361.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while VSSPY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs CLNFF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 335.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CLNFF trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 102.36. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs DELRF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 327.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while DELRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to DELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs DLUEY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 327.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to DLUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs KPGHF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 325.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while KPGHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 181.25. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs CTAGF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 288.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CTAGF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs KBRLF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 265.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while KBRLF trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ITEGY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to ITEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs PCRRF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs AJISF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while AJISF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs PCOA Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CGRW has daily volatility of 1.82 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.
CGRW vs CTAGY Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 97.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CTAGY trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs WTLLF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 87.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while WTLLF trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ASFH Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 81.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ASFH trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ASFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs PGWFF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 78.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while PGWFF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs DCMDF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 77.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while DCMDF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to DCMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs RDCPF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs CERGF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 62.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CERGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to CERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs FLNCF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 56.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while FLNCF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to FLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ESTTF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 42.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SFRX Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 40.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SFRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs CRKT Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 38.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CRKT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs UWHGF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to UWHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs FTBGF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to FTBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SRRPF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SRRPF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to SRRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs GNOLF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 19.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to GNOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs NSYC Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 19.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while NSYC trades at $441.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to NSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to NSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ELVG Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 8.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ELVG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ELVG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs GPOX Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 7.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while GPOX trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ADMQ Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 6.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ADMQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs REPO Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while REPO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs LMTI Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while LMTI trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs BLIS Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, BLIS has a market cap of 2.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while BLIS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLIS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to BLIS's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to BLIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs OODH Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while OODH trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to OODH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs ANMP Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while ANMP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to ANMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to ANMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SAYFF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to SAYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs JFIL Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 999285.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while JFIL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to JFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs HHGI Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 675406.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while HHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to HHGI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to HHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs CLRYF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CLRYF has a market cap of 579915.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CLRYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CLRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CLRYF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to CLRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs UNDR Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 479404.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while UNDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to UNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs AWAW Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 435082.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while AWAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs MTPR Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 407967.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while MTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to MTPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs DTSL Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391291.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while DTSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to DTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs WLDPF Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 305956.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs INCC Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 219507.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while INCC trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs OPMG Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219237.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while OPMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to OPMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs IJJP Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 192545.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while IJJP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to IJJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs XCPL Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 168521.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while XCPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to XCPL's ROE of +7.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to XCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs IMJX Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112725.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while IMJX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs BRYN Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, BRYN has a market cap of 107900.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while BRYN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to BRYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to BRYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs CTGL Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 104407.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to CTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs NNFC Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97837.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while NNFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to NNFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to NNFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs DPUI Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 83296.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while DPUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to DPUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs UCPC Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56164.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while UCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs GFGU Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48460.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while GFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to GFGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs EVSV Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, EVSV has a market cap of 45765.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while EVSV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to EVSV's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to EVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs BFLD Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43750.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while BFLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs SGLS Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39548.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while SGLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to SGLS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to SGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs CBMJ Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 38111.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs PIFR Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 35132.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while PIFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is more volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.
CGRW vs AXCG Comparison
CGRW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGRW stands at 2.23M. In comparison, AXCG has a market cap of 31542.00. Regarding current trading prices, CGRW is priced at $0.02, while AXCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGRW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AXCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGRW's ROE is +1.18%, compared to AXCG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGRW is less volatile compared to AXCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGRW.