CGN Power Co., Ltd.
CGN Power Co., Ltd. (CGNWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CGNWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGNWF | $0.36 | +0.00% | 23B | 11.83 | $0.03 | +3.70% |
| UNPRF | $39.77 | -9.10% | 16.6B | -165.71 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| HGKGF | $6.65 | +1.14% | 14.2B | 17.97 | $0.37 | +5.45% |
| HGKGY | $6.42 | -3.46% | 13.7B | 17.36 | $0.37 | +5.33% |
| HUNGF | $0.64 | +2.19% | 13.5B | 9.12 | $0.07 | +5.83% |
| CRPJY | $37.07 | +0.00% | 12.8B | 6.53 | $5.68 | +5.73% |
| CRPJF | $2.33 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 6.13 | $0.38 | +6.32% |
| CPYYY | $8.84 | +1.26% | 10.5B | -35.24 | -$0.25 | +2.66% |
| CPYYF | $2.17 | +0.00% | 10.3B | -36.17 | -$0.06 | +2.74% |
| DIPGF | $0.26 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 8.67 | $0.03 | +3.33% |
Stock Comparison
CGNWF vs UNPRF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, UNPRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while UNPRF trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas UNPRF's P/E ratio is -165.71. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNPRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to UNPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check UNPRF's competition here
CGNWF vs HGKGF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, HGKGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while HGKGF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas HGKGF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGKGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to HGKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check HGKGF's competition here
CGNWF vs HGKGY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, HGKGY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while HGKGY trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas HGKGY's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGKGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to HGKGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check HGKGY's competition here
CGNWF vs HUNGF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, HUNGF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while HUNGF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas HUNGF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUNGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to HUNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check HUNGF's competition here
CGNWF vs CRPJY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CRPJY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CRPJY trades at $37.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CRPJY's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRPJY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CRPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CRPJY's competition here
CGNWF vs CRPJF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CRPJF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CRPJF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CRPJF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRPJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CRPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CRPJF's competition here
CGNWF vs CPYYY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CPYYY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPYYY trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPYYY's P/E ratio is -35.24. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPYYY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPYYY's competition here
CGNWF vs CPYYF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CPYYF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPYYF trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPYYF's P/E ratio is -36.17. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPYYF's competition here
CGNWF vs DIPGF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, DIPGF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while DIPGF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas DIPGF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIPGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to DIPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check DIPGF's competition here
CGNWF vs CPRHF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CPRHF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPRHF trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPRHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPRHF's competition here
CGNWF vs CPWPF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CPWPF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPWPF trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPWPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPWPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPWPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPWPF's competition here
CGNWF vs EDRVY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, EDRVY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while EDRVY trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas EDRVY's P/E ratio is -16.58. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDRVY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to EDRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check EDRVY's competition here
CGNWF vs TLNE Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, TLNE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while TLNE trades at $125.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas TLNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TLNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to TLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check TLNE's competition here
CGNWF vs CPXWF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CPXWF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CPXWF trades at $40.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CPXWF's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPXWF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CPXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CPXWF's competition here
CGNWF vs KYSEF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, KYSEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while KYSEF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas KYSEF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYSEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to KYSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check KYSEF's competition here
CGNWF vs AGLXY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, AGLXY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while AGLXY trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas AGLXY's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to AGLXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check AGLXY's competition here
CGNWF vs CTPTY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CTPTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CTPTY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CTPTY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTPTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CTPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CTPTY's competition here
CGNWF vs AGLNF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, AGLNF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while AGLNF trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas AGLNF's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGLNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to AGLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check AGLNF's competition here
CGNWF vs CTPZY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CTPZY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CTPZY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CTPZY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTPZY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CTPZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CTPZY's competition here
CGNWF vs KYSEY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, KYSEY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while KYSEY trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas KYSEY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYSEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to KYSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check KYSEY's competition here
CGNWF vs TSLTF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, TSLTF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while TSLTF trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas TSLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSLTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to TSLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check TSLTF's competition here
CGNWF vs EYUBY Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, EYUBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while EYUBY trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas EYUBY's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EYUBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to EYUBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check EYUBY's competition here
CGNWF vs TNSSF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, TNSSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while TNSSF trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas TNSSF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNSSF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to TNSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check TNSSF's competition here
CGNWF vs ACPIF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, ACPIF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while ACPIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas ACPIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACPIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to ACPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check ACPIF's competition here
CGNWF vs EYGPF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, EYGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while EYGPF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas EYGPF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EYGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to EYGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check EYGPF's competition here
CGNWF vs CGEGF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, CGEGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while CGEGF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas CGEGF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGEGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to CGEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check CGEGF's competition here
CGNWF vs SRGRF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, SRGRF has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while SRGRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas SRGRF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRGRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to SRGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check SRGRF's competition here
CGNWF vs RJIFF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, RJIFF has a market cap of 289.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while RJIFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas RJIFF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RJIFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to RJIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check RJIFF's competition here
CGNWF vs MXGFF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, MXGFF has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while MXGFF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas MXGFF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MXGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to MXGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check MXGFF's competition here
CGNWF vs EWCLF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, EWCLF has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while EWCLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas EWCLF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWCLF's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to EWCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check EWCLF's competition here
CGNWF vs GDYMF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, GDYMF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while GDYMF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas GDYMF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GDYMF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to GDYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check GDYMF's competition here
CGNWF vs GEFI Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, GEFI has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while GEFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas GEFI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to GEFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check GEFI's competition here
CGNWF vs SOPV Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, SOPV has a market cap of 608. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while SOPV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas SOPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOPV's ROE of +57.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to SOPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check SOPV's competition here
CGNWF vs BLSP Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, BLSP has a market cap of 105. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while BLSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas BLSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLSP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to BLSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check BLSP's competition here
CGNWF vs NPIWF Comparison August 2025
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 23B. In comparison, NPIWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.36, while NPIWF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.83, whereas NPIWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPIWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is more volatile compared to NPIWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.Check NPIWF's competition here