CGN Power Co., Ltd.
CGN Power Co., Ltd. CGNWF Peers
See (CGNWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGNWF | $0.20 | +0.00% | 19.2B | 6.67 | $0.03 | +6.57% |
| UNPRF | $44.34 | +0.00% | 18.5B | -192.78 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| HUNGF | $0.66 | +0.00% | 14.3B | 9.48 | $0.07 | +5.66% |
| HGKGY | $6.62 | +3.05% | 14.1B | 17.88 | $0.37 | +5.18% |
| HGKGF | $6.51 | +2.84% | 13.9B | 17.59 | $0.37 | +5.57% |
| CRPJY | $36.45 | +0.00% | 12.6B | 6.42 | $5.68 | +5.84% |
| CRPJF | $2.33 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 6.13 | $0.38 | +6.32% |
| CPYYF | $2.27 | +0.00% | 10.9B | 6.68 | $0.34 | +2.62% |
| CPYYY | $8.58 | -3.62% | 10.3B | 6.26 | $1.37 | +2.73% |
| DIPGF | $0.26 | +0.00% | 7.1B | 8.67 | $0.03 | +3.32% |
Stock Comparison
CGNWF vs UNPRF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, UNPRF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while UNPRF trades at $44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas UNPRF's P/E ratio is -192.78. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNPRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to UNPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs HUNGF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, HUNGF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while HUNGF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas HUNGF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HUNGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to HUNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs HGKGY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, HGKGY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while HGKGY trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas HGKGY's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGKGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to HGKGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs HGKGF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, HGKGF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while HGKGF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas HGKGF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGKGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to HGKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs CRPJY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CRPJY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CRPJY trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CRPJY's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRPJY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CRPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs CRPJF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CRPJF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CRPJF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CRPJF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRPJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CRPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs CPYYF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CPYYF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CPYYF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CPYYF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPYYF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CPYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs CPYYY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CPYYY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CPYYY trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CPYYY's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPYYY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CPYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs DIPGF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, DIPGF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while DIPGF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas DIPGF's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DIPGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to DIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs CPRHF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CPRHF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CPRHF trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CPRHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CPRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs TLNE Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TLNE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while TLNE trades at $125.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas TLNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TLNE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and TLNE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs CPXWF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CPXWF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CPXWF trades at $40.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CPXWF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPXWF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CPXWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs CPWPF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CPWPF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CPWPF trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CPWPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPWPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CPWPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs EDRVY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, EDRVY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while EDRVY trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas EDRVY's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDRVY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to EDRVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs KYSEF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, KYSEF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while KYSEF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas KYSEF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to KYSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs AGLXY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, AGLXY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while AGLXY trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas AGLXY's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to AGLXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs AGLNF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, AGLNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while AGLNF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas AGLNF's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGLNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to AGLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs CTPTY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CTPTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CTPTY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CTPTY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTPTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and CTPTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs CTPZY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CTPZY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CTPZY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CTPZY's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTPZY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to CTPZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs KYSEY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, KYSEY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while KYSEY trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas KYSEY's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KYSEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and KYSEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs TSLTF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TSLTF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while TSLTF trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas TSLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSLTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to TSLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs EYUBY Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, EYUBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while EYUBY trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas EYUBY's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EYUBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to EYUBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs TNSSF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TNSSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while TNSSF trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas TNSSF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNSSF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and TNSSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs ACPIF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ACPIF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while ACPIF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas ACPIF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACPIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to ACPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs EYGPF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, EYGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while EYGPF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas EYGPF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EYGPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and EYGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs CGEGF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CGEGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while CGEGF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas CGEGF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGEGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and CGEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs SRGRF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SRGRF has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while SRGRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas SRGRF's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRGRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and SRGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs RJIFF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, RJIFF has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while RJIFF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas RJIFF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RJIFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to RJIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs MXGFF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, MXGFF has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while MXGFF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas MXGFF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MXGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and MXGFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs EWCLF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, EWCLF has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while EWCLF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas EWCLF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EWCLF's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to EWCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs GDYMF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GDYMF has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while GDYMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas GDYMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GDYMF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to GDYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs BLSP Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, BLSP has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while BLSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas BLSP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLSP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and BLSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs GEFI Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GEFI has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while GEFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas GEFI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GEFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and GEFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CGNWF vs SOPV Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SOPV has a market cap of 608. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while SOPV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas SOPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOPV's ROE of +57.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF is less volatile compared to SOPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGNWF.
CGNWF vs NPIWF Comparison
CGNWF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGNWF stands at 19.2B. In comparison, NPIWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CGNWF is priced at $0.20, while NPIWF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGNWF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.67, whereas NPIWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGNWF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPIWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGNWF and NPIWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).