Canopy Growth Corporation
Canopy Growth Corporation CGC Peers
See (CGC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGC | $1.70 | +24.09% | 353M | -0.42 | -$4.09 | N/A |
| ZTS | $170.01 | +0.83% | 75.7B | 30.52 | $5.57 | +1.10% |
| HLN | $11.07 | -0.49% | 50B | 25.73 | $0.43 | +1.52% |
| TAK | $14.96 | -0.23% | 47.1B | 65.02 | $0.23 | +3.94% |
| TEVA | $17.77 | +3.01% | 20.4B | -15.45 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ITCI | $131.87 | N/A | 14B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| RDY | $15.54 | +0.07% | 12.9B | 19.67 | $0.79 | +0.62% |
| NBIX | $125.34 | +0.59% | 12.4B | 42.49 | $2.95 | N/A |
| CTLT | $63.48 | N/A | 11.5B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| VTRS | $8.71 | +2.96% | 10.2B | -2.74 | -$3.18 | +5.53% |
Stock Comparison
CGC vs ZTS Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ZTS trades at $170.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs HLN Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while HLN trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TAK Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TAK has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TAK trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TAK's P/E ratio is 65.02. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TAK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TEVA Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TEVA trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TEVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ITCI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ITCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs RDY Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while RDY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs NBIX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while NBIX trades at $125.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 42.49. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs CTLT Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs VTRS Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while VTRS trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs RGC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while RGC trades at $695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -2171.87. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RGC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ELAN Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ELAN trades at $13.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ELAN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs LNTH Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while LNTH trades at $81.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs PRGO Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while PRGO trades at $26.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs AMRX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while AMRX trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is -190.50. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ALVOW Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ALVOW trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ALVO Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ALVO trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ALVO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs HCM Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while HCM trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 76.75. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs BGM Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while BGM trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -68.84. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to BGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs DCPH Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs EMBCV Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SUPN Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SUPN trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SUPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs BHC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while BHC trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is -39.62. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to BHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs INDV Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while INDV trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is -281.40. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to INDV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TARO Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs EVO Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while EVO trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ANIP Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ANIP trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is -52.51. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ANIP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs DVAX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while DVAX trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -20.48. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs AMPH Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while AMPH trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs PCRX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while PCRX trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PCRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs HROW Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, HROW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while HROW trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas HROW's P/E ratio is -48.51. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HROW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to HROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs PAHC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 976M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while PAHC trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs COLL Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 970.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while COLL trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs AVDL Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 940.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while AVDL trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -37.38. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs PETQ Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs CRON Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 763.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while CRON trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CRON's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs EOLS Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 647.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while EOLS trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EOLS's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs BDSI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs EMBC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 572.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while EMBC trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to EMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SIGA Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 430.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SIGA trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TLRY Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TLRY trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs KMDA Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 393.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while KMDA trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ORGO Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 384.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ORGO trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is -18.94. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ORGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs EBS Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, EBS has a market cap of 360.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while EBS trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas EBS's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EBS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to EBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs AQST Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while AQST trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SNDL Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 339.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SNDL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TKNO Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 316.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TKNO trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ACB Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 313.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ACB trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ACB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ALIM Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ZYBT Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ZYBT trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is 98.50. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs LNDC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LNDC's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs LFCR Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 253.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while LFCR trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ESPR Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ESPR has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ESPR trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ESPR's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ESPR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ESPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TYHT Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs OGI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while OGI trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs REPH Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs DERM Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while DERM trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DERM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs BIOA Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, BIOA has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while BIOA trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas BIOA's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to BIOA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to BIOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs THTX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while THTX trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -36.86. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs CRDL Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while CRDL trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SCTL Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs PROC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while PROC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs IRWD Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while IRWD trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to IRWD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs OPTN Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while OPTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to OPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ZOM Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ZOM has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ZOM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ZOM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZOM's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ZOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs GRVI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GRVI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs CPIX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while CPIX trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -24.25. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs INCR Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while INCR trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ZYNE Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SSIC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ASRT Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ASRT trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs VLNS Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SXTC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SXTC has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SXTC trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SXTC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SXTC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is less volatile compared to SXTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs JUPW Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -9.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs QNTM Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while QNTM trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to QNTM's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs QLI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, QLI has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while QLI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas QLI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to QLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to QLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SCYX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SCYX trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs RMTI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while RMTI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs HEXO Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs KALA Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, KALA has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while KALA trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas KALA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to KALA's ROE of -3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to KALA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs EGRX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, EGRX has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while EGRX trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas EGRX's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to EGRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to EGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs CYTH Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to CYTH's ROE of +7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to CYTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs IXHL Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, IXHL has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while IXHL trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas IXHL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to IXHL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to IXHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs DRRX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while DRRX trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to DRRX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs GELS Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while GELS trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to GELS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TXMD Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TXMD trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TXMD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs PRPH Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, PRPH has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while PRPH trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas PRPH's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to PRPH's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to PRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs ACRX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs FLGC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while FLGC trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs COSM Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while COSM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs AYTU Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while AYTU trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AYTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is less volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs TLPH Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while TLPH trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs AGRX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SISI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SISI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SISI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SISI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SISI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to SISI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs YCBD Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, YCBD has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while YCBD trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas YCBD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to YCBD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to YCBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs IMCC Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, IMCC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while IMCC trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas IMCC's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to IMCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to IMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs NLTX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs SBFMW Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, SBFMW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while SBFMW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas SBFMW's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to SBFMW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is less volatile compared to SBFMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs LCI Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.
CGC vs BGXX Comparison
CGC plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CGC stands at 353M. In comparison, BGXX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CGC is priced at $1.70, while BGXX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CGC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.42, whereas BGXX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CGC's ROE is -1.13%, compared to BGXX's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CGC is more volatile compared to BGXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CGC.