aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CFC.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CFC.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFC.DE | €0.43 | -6.52% | 6.8M | -1.19 | -€0.35 | N/A |
| CIS.DE | €95.73 | -0.04% | 373.7B | 27.42 | €3.46 | +1.49% |
| MTLA.DE | €411.90 | +1.40% | 68.5B | 30.51 | €13.53 | +0.98% |
| LU2.DE | €746.10 | +1.36% | 58B | 144.76 | €5.15 | N/A |
| NOA3.DE | €8.76 | +0.07% | 48.9B | 30.73 | €0.29 | +1.60% |
| CIE1.DE | €339.30 | -1.09% | 47.8B | 114.13 | €2.96 | N/A |
| ERCG.DE | €8.88 | +2.30% | 29.2B | 13.22 | €0.67 | +2.98% |
| ERCB.DE | €8.73 | +0.11% | 28.7B | 13.03 | €0.67 | +3.03% |
| JNP.DE | €34.69 | -0.77% | 11.4B | 34.01 | €1.02 | N/A |
| ADV.DE | €23.00 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 179.77 | €0.13 | +2.26% |
Stock Comparison
Cisco Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CIS.DE)
CFC.DE vs CIS.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CIS.DE has a market cap of 373.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while CIS.DE trades at €95.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas CIS.DE's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to CIS.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to CIS.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check CIS.DE's competition here
Motorola Solutions, Inc. (XETRA: MTLA.DE)
CFC.DE vs MTLA.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MTLA.DE has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while MTLA.DE trades at €411.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas MTLA.DE's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to MTLA.DE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to MTLA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check MTLA.DE's competition here
Lumentum Holdings Inc. (XETRA: LU2.DE)
CFC.DE vs LU2.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, LU2.DE has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while LU2.DE trades at €746.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas LU2.DE's P/E ratio is 144.76. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to LU2.DE's ROE of -3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to LU2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check LU2.DE's competition here
Nokia Oyj (XETRA: NOA3.DE)
CFC.DE vs NOA3.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, NOA3.DE has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while NOA3.DE trades at €8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas NOA3.DE's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to NOA3.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to NOA3.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check NOA3.DE's competition here
Ciena Corporation (XETRA: CIE1.DE)
CFC.DE vs CIE1.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CIE1.DE has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while CIE1.DE trades at €339.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas CIE1.DE's P/E ratio is 114.13. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to CIE1.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to CIE1.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check CIE1.DE's competition here
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (XETRA: ERCG.DE)
CFC.DE vs ERCG.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ERCG.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while ERCG.DE trades at €8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas ERCG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to ERCG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to ERCG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check ERCG.DE's competition here
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (XETRA: ERCB.DE)
CFC.DE vs ERCB.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ERCB.DE has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while ERCB.DE trades at €8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas ERCB.DE's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to ERCB.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to ERCB.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check ERCB.DE's competition here
Juniper Networks, Inc. (XETRA: JNP.DE)
CFC.DE vs JNP.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, JNP.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while JNP.DE trades at €34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas JNP.DE's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to JNP.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to JNP.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check JNP.DE's competition here
Adtran Networks SE (XETRA: ADV.DE)
CFC.DE vs ADV.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ADV.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while ADV.DE trades at €23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas ADV.DE's P/E ratio is 179.77. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to ADV.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is similarly volatile compared to ADV.DE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check ADV.DE's competition here
Frequentis AG (XETRA: FQT.DE)
CFC.DE vs FQT.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FQT.DE has a market cap of 956.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while FQT.DE trades at €72.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas FQT.DE's P/E ratio is 53.41. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to FQT.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to FQT.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check FQT.DE's competition here
CeoTronics AG (XETRA: CEK.DE)
CFC.DE vs CEK.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CEK.DE has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while CEK.DE trades at €10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas CEK.DE's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to CEK.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to CEK.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check CEK.DE's competition here
DZS Inc. (BER: TLFP.BE)
CFC.DE vs TLFP.BE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TLFP.BE has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while TLFP.BE trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas TLFP.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to TLFP.BE's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is similarly volatile compared to TLFP.BE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check TLFP.BE's competition here
Gigaset AG (XETRA: GGS.DE)
CFC.DE vs GGS.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, GGS.DE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while GGS.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas GGS.DE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to GGS.DE's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is similarly volatile compared to GGS.DE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check GGS.DE's competition here
Arzneiwerk AG VIDA (XETRA: TLIK.DE)
CFC.DE vs TLIK.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TLIK.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while TLIK.DE trades at €0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas TLIK.DE's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to TLIK.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is similarly volatile compared to TLIK.DE. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check TLIK.DE's competition here
Mynaric AG (XETRA: M0YN.DE)
CFC.DE vs M0YN.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, M0YN.DE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while M0YN.DE trades at €0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas M0YN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to M0YN.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to M0YN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check M0YN.DE's competition here
Mynaric AG (XETRA: M0Y.DE)
CFC.DE vs M0Y.DE Comparison August 2026
aconnic AG (XETRA: CFC.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 6.8M. In comparison, M0Y.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.43 on the XETRA, while M0Y.DE trades at €28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.19, whereas M0Y.DE's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -10.76%, compared to M0Y.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to M0Y.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.Check M0Y.DE's competition here