UET United Electronic Technology AG
UET United Electronic Technology AG CFC.DE Peers
See (CFC.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFC.DE | €0.92 | -3.17% | 14.9M | -2.54 | -€0.36 | N/A |
| CIS.DE | €56.54 | +0.30% | 223.9B | 26.18 | €2.16 | +2.61% |
| MTLA.DE | €247.80 | N/A | 41.4B | 36.82 | €6.73 | N/A |
| ERCG.DE | €8.11 | +0.37% | 25.1B | 202.75 | €0.04 | +1.60% |
| ERCB.DE | €7.56 | +0.88% | 24.9B | 188.95 | €0.04 | +1.72% |
| NOA3.DE | €4.75 | +1.78% | 24.8B | 21.58 | €0.22 | +2.74% |
| 2HP.DE | €15.64 | +1.43% | 20.5B | 17.19 | €0.91 | +2.80% |
| CIE1.DE | €85.74 | -0.21% | 12.3B | 61.68 | €1.39 | N/A |
| JNP.DE | €34.69 | -0.77% | 11.4B | 34.01 | €1.02 | +1.35% |
| ADV.DE | €20.60 | N/A | 1.1B | -45.78 | -€0.45 | +2.52% |
Stock Comparison
CFC.DE vs CIS.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, CIS.DE has a market cap of 223.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while CIS.DE trades at €56.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas CIS.DE's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to CIS.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to CIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs MTLA.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, MTLA.DE has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while MTLA.DE trades at €247.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas MTLA.DE's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to MTLA.DE's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to MTLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs ERCG.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, ERCG.DE has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while ERCG.DE trades at €8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas ERCG.DE's P/E ratio is 202.75. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to ERCG.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to ERCG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs ERCB.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, ERCB.DE has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while ERCB.DE trades at €7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas ERCB.DE's P/E ratio is 188.95. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to ERCB.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to ERCB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs NOA3.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, NOA3.DE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while NOA3.DE trades at €4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas NOA3.DE's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to NOA3.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to NOA3.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs 2HP.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, 2HP.DE has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while 2HP.DE trades at €15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas 2HP.DE's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to 2HP.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to 2HP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs CIE1.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, CIE1.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while CIE1.DE trades at €85.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas CIE1.DE's P/E ratio is 61.68. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to CIE1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to CIE1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs JNP.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, JNP.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while JNP.DE trades at €34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas JNP.DE's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to JNP.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to JNP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs ADV.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, ADV.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while ADV.DE trades at €20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas ADV.DE's P/E ratio is -45.78. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to ADV.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to ADV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs ADVV.F Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, ADVV.F has a market cap of 837.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while ADVV.F trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas ADVV.F's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to ADVV.F's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to ADVV.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs FQT.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, FQT.DE has a market cap of 651.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while FQT.DE trades at €49.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas FQT.DE's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to FQT.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to FQT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs CEK.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, CEK.DE has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while CEK.DE trades at €13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas CEK.DE's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to CEK.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to CEK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs CEA.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, CEA.DE has a market cap of 59.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while CEA.DE trades at €6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas CEA.DE's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to CEA.DE's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to CEA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs TLFP.BE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, TLFP.BE has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while TLFP.BE trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas TLFP.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to TLFP.BE's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to TLFP.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs GGS.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, GGS.DE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while GGS.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas GGS.DE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to GGS.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is more volatile compared to GGS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs TLIK.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, TLIK.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while TLIK.DE trades at €0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas TLIK.DE's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to TLIK.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to TLIK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs M0YN.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, M0YN.DE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while M0YN.DE trades at €0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas M0YN.DE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to M0YN.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to M0YN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.
CFC.DE vs M0Y.DE Comparison
CFC.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CFC.DE stands at 14.9M. In comparison, M0Y.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CFC.DE is priced at €0.92, while M0Y.DE trades at €28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CFC.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.54, whereas M0Y.DE's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, CFC.DE's ROE is -6.70%, compared to M0Y.DE's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CFC.DE is less volatile compared to M0Y.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CFC.DE.