CESC Limited
CESC Limited (CESC.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CESC.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CESC.BO | ₹148.55 | -3.57% | 202.6B | 13.97 | ₹10.94 | +3.93% |
| NTPC.BO | ₹372.55 | -0.37% | 3.7T | 21.09 | ₹18.06 | +2.32% |
| POWERGRID.NS | ₹302.10 | +1.82% | 2.8T | 19.10 | ₹15.58 | +3.02% |
| POWERGRID.BO | ₹301.65 | +1.70% | 2.8T | 19.11 | ₹15.57 | +3.02% |
| NLCINDIA.NS | ₹253.80 | -1.88% | 369.3B | 13.86 | ₹19.22 | +1.91% |
| NLCINDIA.BO | ₹253.60 | -2.07% | 369.3B | 13.86 | ₹19.21 | +1.91% |
| PGINVIT.NS | ₹89.98 | -0.03% | 82.7B | 6.11 | ₹14.86 | N/A |
| PGINVIT-IV.NS | ₹89.98 | -0.03% | 82.6B | N/A | N/A | +9.64% |
| SGMART.BO | ₹444.70 | +2.10% | 51.7B | 51.26 | ₹8.46 | N/A |
| RELINFRA.NS | ₹73.59 | -2.80% | 31.6B | 0.50 | ₹155.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CESC.BO vs NTPC.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, NTPC.BO has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while NTPC.BO trades at ₹372.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas NTPC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTPC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is more volatile compared to NTPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check NTPC.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs POWERGRID.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, POWERGRID.NS has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while POWERGRID.NS trades at ₹302.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas POWERGRID.NS's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POWERGRID.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to POWERGRID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check POWERGRID.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs POWERGRID.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, POWERGRID.BO has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while POWERGRID.BO trades at ₹301.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas POWERGRID.BO's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POWERGRID.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to POWERGRID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check POWERGRID.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs NLCINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, NLCINDIA.NS has a market cap of 369.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while NLCINDIA.NS trades at ₹253.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas NLCINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NLCINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to NLCINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check NLCINDIA.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs NLCINDIA.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, NLCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 369.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while NLCINDIA.BO trades at ₹253.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas NLCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NLCINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to NLCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check NLCINDIA.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs PGINVIT.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, PGINVIT.NS has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while PGINVIT.NS trades at ₹89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas PGINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGINVIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is more volatile compared to PGINVIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check PGINVIT.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs PGINVIT-IV.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, PGINVIT-IV.NS has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while PGINVIT-IV.NS trades at ₹89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas PGINVIT-IV.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGINVIT-IV.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is more volatile compared to PGINVIT-IV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check PGINVIT-IV.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs SGMART.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, SGMART.BO has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while SGMART.BO trades at ₹444.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas SGMART.BO's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGMART.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to SGMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check SGMART.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs RELINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, RELINFRA.NS has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while RELINFRA.NS trades at ₹73.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas RELINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RELINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to RELINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check RELINFRA.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs GIPCL.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, GIPCL.BO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while GIPCL.BO trades at ₹127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas GIPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIPCL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to GIPCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check GIPCL.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs GIPCL.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, GIPCL.NS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while GIPCL.NS trades at ₹126.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas GIPCL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIPCL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to GIPCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check GIPCL.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs BAJEL.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, BAJEL.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while BAJEL.NS trades at ₹156.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas BAJEL.NS's P/E ratio is 169.79. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAJEL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to BAJEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check BAJEL.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs BAJEL.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, BAJEL.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while BAJEL.BO trades at ₹155.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas BAJEL.BO's P/E ratio is 171.47. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAJEL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to BAJEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check BAJEL.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs DPSCLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, DPSCLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while DPSCLTD.NS trades at ₹7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas DPSCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 265.33. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DPSCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to DPSCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check DPSCLTD.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs EKI.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, EKI.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while EKI.BO trades at ₹74.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas EKI.BO's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EKI.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to EKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check EKI.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs MADHAVIPL.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, MADHAVIPL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while MADHAVIPL.BO trades at ₹7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas MADHAVIPL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MADHAVIPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to MADHAVIPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check MADHAVIPL.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs ENERGYDEV.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, ENERGYDEV.NS has a market cap of 718.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while ENERGYDEV.NS trades at ₹14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas ENERGYDEV.NS's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENERGYDEV.NS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to ENERGYDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check ENERGYDEV.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs ENERGYDEV.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, ENERGYDEV.BO has a market cap of 717.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while ENERGYDEV.BO trades at ₹14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas ENERGYDEV.BO's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENERGYDEV.BO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to ENERGYDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check ENERGYDEV.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs WAA.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, WAA.BO has a market cap of 650.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while WAA.BO trades at ₹47.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas WAA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WAA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to WAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check WAA.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs GITARENEW.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, GITARENEW.BO has a market cap of 325.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while GITARENEW.BO trades at ₹75.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas GITARENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -141.27. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GITARENEW.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to GITARENEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check GITARENEW.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs AGNI.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, AGNI.NS has a market cap of 279.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while AGNI.NS trades at ₹13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas AGNI.NS's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGNI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to AGNI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check AGNI.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs KSK.NS Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, KSK.NS has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while KSK.NS trades at ₹0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas KSK.NS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSK.NS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to KSK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check KSK.NS's competition here
CESC.BO vs SRMENERGY.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, SRMENERGY.BO has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while SRMENERGY.BO trades at ₹18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas SRMENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRMENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is less volatile compared to SRMENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check SRMENERGY.BO's competition here
CESC.BO vs ANANDPROJ.BO Comparison March 2026
CESC.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CESC.BO stands at 202.6B. In comparison, ANANDPROJ.BO has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CESC.BO is priced at ₹148.55, while ANANDPROJ.BO trades at ₹23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CESC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.97, whereas ANANDPROJ.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CESC.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANANDPROJ.BO's ROE of -10.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CESC.BO is more volatile compared to ANANDPROJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CESC.BO.Check ANANDPROJ.BO's competition here