iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CEMR.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEMR.DE | €13.54 | -0.51% | 660.6M | 21.59 | €0.63 | N/A |
| 0P00000MO4.F | €349.45 | +0.24% | 2.9T | 16.50 | €21.18 | N/A |
| 0P00000W6B.F | €302.66 | +0.25% | 2.5T | 16.48 | €18.37 | N/A |
| 0P00001QSE.F | €291.72 | +0.55% | 2.4T | 15.92 | €18.32 | N/A |
| BBN1.F | €144.64 | +1.02% | 179.2B | 45.55 | €3.19 | +2.50% |
| BLQA.DE | €845.50 | -0.62% | 125.2B | 23.42 | €36.10 | +0.60% |
| ZPDW.DE | €76.72 | -0.76% | 122.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWLE.DE | €9.10 | -0.16% | 116B | N/A | N/A | +1.21% |
| SXR8.DE | €581.38 | +0.02% | 108.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| U1FB.DE | €24.86 | -1.07% | 102.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CEMR.DE vs 0P00000MO4.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, 0P00000MO4.F has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while 0P00000MO4.F trades at €349.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas 0P00000MO4.F's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000MO4.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000MO4.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check 0P00000MO4.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs 0P00000W6B.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, 0P00000W6B.F has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while 0P00000W6B.F trades at €302.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas 0P00000W6B.F's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000W6B.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000W6B.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check 0P00000W6B.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs 0P00001QSE.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, 0P00001QSE.F has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while 0P00001QSE.F trades at €291.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas 0P00001QSE.F's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00001QSE.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00001QSE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check 0P00001QSE.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs BBN1.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, BBN1.F has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while BBN1.F trades at €144.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BBN1.F's P/E ratio is 45.55. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBN1.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to BBN1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check BBN1.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs BLQA.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, BLQA.DE has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while BLQA.DE trades at €845.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas BLQA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLQA.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to BLQA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check BLQA.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs ZPDW.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, ZPDW.DE has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while ZPDW.DE trades at €76.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas ZPDW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPDW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to ZPDW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check ZPDW.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IWLE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IWLE.DE has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IWLE.DE trades at €9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IWLE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWLE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IWLE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IWLE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SXR8.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SXR8.DE has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SXR8.DE trades at €581.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SXR8.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SXR8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SXR8.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs U1FB.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, U1FB.DE has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while U1FB.DE trades at €24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas U1FB.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U1FB.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE and U1FB.DE have similar daily volatility (0.52).Check U1FB.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EUNL.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EUNL.DE has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EUNL.DE trades at €103.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EUNL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EUNL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EUNL.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VUAA.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VUAA.DE has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VUAA.DE trades at €104.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VUAA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUAA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VUAA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VUAA.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VUSA.DE has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VUSA.DE trades at €103.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VUSA.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SXRZ.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SXRZ.DE has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SXRZ.DE trades at €240.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SXRZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRZ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SXRZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SXRZ.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs E500.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, E500.DE has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while E500.DE trades at €48.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas E500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to E500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to E500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check E500.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XJSE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XJSE.DE has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XJSE.DE trades at €6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XJSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XJSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XJSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XJSE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs P500.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, P500.DE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while P500.DE trades at €1,081.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas P500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to P500.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to P500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check P500.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs D500.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, D500.DE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while D500.DE trades at €50.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas D500.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D500.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to D500.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check D500.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VGWL.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VGWL.DE has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VGWL.DE trades at €131.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VGWL.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VGWL.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VWCE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VWCE.DE has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VWCE.DE trades at €133.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VWCE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWCE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VWCE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VWCE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VGWL.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VGWL.F has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VGWL.F trades at €102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VGWL.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWL.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VGWL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VGWL.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs A4S.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, A4S.DE has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while A4S.DE trades at €275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas A4S.DE's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to A4S.DE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to A4S.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check A4S.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SPPE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SPPE.DE has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SPPE.DE trades at €15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SPPE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SPPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SPPE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs AW1Q.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, AW1Q.DE has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while AW1Q.DE trades at €18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas AW1Q.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AW1Q.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to AW1Q.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check AW1Q.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IE00B3YCGJ38.SG Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IE00B3YCGJ38.SG has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IE00B3YCGJ38.SG trades at €1,081.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B3YCGJ38.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IE00B3YCGJ38.SG's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SPY5.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SPY5.DE has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SPY5.DE trades at €544.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SPY5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPY5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SPY5.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SPY5.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IBC3.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IBC3.F has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IBC3.F trades at €4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IBC3.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to IBC3.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IBC3.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IS3N.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IS3N.DE has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IS3N.DE trades at €34.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IS3N.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IS3N.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IS3N.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IS3N.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IBC3.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IBC3.DE has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IBC3.DE trades at €4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IBC3.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IBC3.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IBC3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IBC3.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs CBUC.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, CBUC.DE has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while CBUC.DE trades at €6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CBUC.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUC.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to CBUC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check CBUC.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs NQSE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, NQSE.DE has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while NQSE.DE trades at €13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas NQSE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NQSE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to NQSE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check NQSE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs PPFB.SG Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, PPFB.SG has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while PPFB.SG trades at €56.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas PPFB.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPFB.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to PPFB.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check PPFB.SG's competition here
CEMR.DE vs LYP2.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, LYP2.DE has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while LYP2.DE trades at €312.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LYP2.DE's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to LYP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check LYP2.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs 6TVM.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, 6TVM.DE has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while 6TVM.DE trades at €56.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas 6TVM.DE's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 6TVM.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to 6TVM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check 6TVM.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs LYPS.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, LYPS.DE has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while LYPS.DE trades at €56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LYPS.DE's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYPS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to LYPS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check LYPS.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XDWL.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XDWL.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XDWL.DE trades at €94.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XDWL.DE's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWL.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XDWL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XDWL.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XDWD.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XDWD.DE has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XDWD.DE trades at €112.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XDWD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XDWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XDWD.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs TR1.DU Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, TR1.DU has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while TR1.DU trades at €90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TR1.DU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TR1.DU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to TR1.DU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check TR1.DU's competition here
CEMR.DE vs OM3L.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, OM3L.DE has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while OM3L.DE trades at €9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas OM3L.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OM3L.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to OM3L.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check OM3L.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EDMU.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EDMU.DE has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EDMU.DE trades at €9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EDMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EDMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EDMU.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SXRV.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SXRV.DE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SXRV.DE trades at €1,143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SXRV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXRV.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SXRV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SXRV.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IUSA.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IUSA.DE has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IUSA.DE trades at €54.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IUSA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IUSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IUSA.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IUSZ.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IUSZ.DE has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IUSZ.DE trades at €10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IUSZ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSZ.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to IUSZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IUSZ.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EUN5.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EUN5.DE has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EUN5.DE trades at €120.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EUN5.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUN5.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to EUN5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EUN5.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EQQQ.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EQQQ.DE has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EQQQ.DE trades at €487.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EQQQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQQQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EQQQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EQQQ.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IUSQ.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IUSQ.DE has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IUSQ.DE trades at €85.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IUSQ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSQ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IUSQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IUSQ.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SGAS.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SGAS.DE has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SGAS.DE trades at €11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SGAS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGAS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SGAS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SGAS.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs JUHE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, JUHE.DE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while JUHE.DE trades at €50.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JUHE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JUHE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to JUHE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check JUHE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SPPW.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SPPW.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SPPW.DE trades at €37.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SPPW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPPW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SPPW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SPPW.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SLUS.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SLUS.DE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SLUS.DE trades at €10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SLUS.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLUS.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to SLUS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SLUS.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs DWS.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, DWS.DE has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while DWS.DE trades at €54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DWS.DE's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWS.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to DWS.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check DWS.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs JREU.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, JREU.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while JREU.DE trades at €54.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JREU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JREU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to JREU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check JREU.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs JRUD.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, JRUD.DE has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while JRUD.DE trades at €50.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas JRUD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JRUD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to JRUD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check JRUD.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IQQY.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IQQY.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IQQY.DE trades at €33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IQQY.DE's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQY.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IQQY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IQQY.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EGV2.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EGV2.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EGV2.DE trades at €102.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EGV2.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGV2.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to EGV2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EGV2.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IE00BMTX1Y45.SG Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IE00BMTX1Y45.SG has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IE00BMTX1Y45.SG trades at €9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IE00BMTX1Y45.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IE00BMTX1Y45.SG's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XD9D.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XD9D.DE has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XD9D.DE trades at €21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XD9D.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9D.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XD9D.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XD9D.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XD9U.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XD9U.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XD9U.DE trades at €160.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XD9U.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9U.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XD9U.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XD9U.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XD9E.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XD9E.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XD9E.DE trades at €128.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XD9E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XD9E.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to XD9E.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XD9E.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs 2B7K.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, 2B7K.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while 2B7K.DE trades at €11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas 2B7K.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7K.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to 2B7K.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check 2B7K.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EUNK.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EUNK.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EUNK.DE trades at €85.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EUNK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EUNK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EUNK.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs QDVE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, QDVE.DE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while QDVE.DE trades at €32.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas QDVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to QDVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check QDVE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IE00B4X9L533.SG Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IE00B4X9L533.SG has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IE00B4X9L533.SG trades at €35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IE00B4X9L533.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B4X9L533.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IE00B4X9L533.SG's competition here
CEMR.DE vs H4ZJ.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, H4ZJ.DE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while H4ZJ.DE trades at €35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas H4ZJ.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZJ.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check H4ZJ.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XDEW.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XDEW.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XDEW.DE trades at €86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XDEW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XDEW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XDEW.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XDEE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XDEE.DE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XDEE.DE trades at €10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XDEE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDEE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XDEE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XDEE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs LYYA.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, LYYA.DE has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while LYYA.DE trades at €351.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LYYA.DE's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYYA.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to LYYA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check LYYA.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs D5BM.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, D5BM.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while D5BM.DE trades at €108.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas D5BM.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to D5BM.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to D5BM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check D5BM.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XS5E.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XS5E.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XS5E.DE trades at €9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XS5E.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XS5E.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XS5E.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XS5E.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs STXH.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, STXH.DE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while STXH.DE trades at €141.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas STXH.DE's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STXH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to STXH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check STXH.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EXS1.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EXS1.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EXS1.DE trades at €198.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EXS1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXS1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EXS1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EXS1.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EXIC.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EXIC.DE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EXIC.DE trades at €6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EXIC.DE's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EXIC.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs LYP6.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, LYP6.DE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while LYP6.DE trades at €259.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LYP6.DE's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYP6.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to LYP6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check LYP6.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EXIE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EXIE.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EXIE.DE trades at €6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EXIE.DE's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EXIE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EXIE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EXSA.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EXSA.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EXSA.DE trades at €54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EXSA.DE's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSA.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EXSA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EXSA.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs 2B7J.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, 2B7J.DE has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while 2B7J.DE trades at €8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas 2B7J.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 2B7J.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to 2B7J.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check 2B7J.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs 0P00000SUJ.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, 0P00000SUJ.F has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while 0P00000SUJ.F trades at €66.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas 0P00000SUJ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P00000SUJ.F's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to 0P00000SUJ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check 0P00000SUJ.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs CBUE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, CBUE.DE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while CBUE.DE trades at €4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas CBUE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to CBUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check CBUE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VGVE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VGVE.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VGVE.DE trades at €101.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VGVE.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVE.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VGVE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VGVE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VGVF.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VGVF.DE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VGVF.DE trades at €105.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VGVF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGVF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VGVF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VGVF.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs DBXW.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, DBXW.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while DBXW.DE trades at €110.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DBXW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXW.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to DBXW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check DBXW.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XWEH.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XWEH.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XWEH.DE trades at €44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XWEH.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWEH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to XWEH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XWEH.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EXW1.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EXW1.DE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EXW1.DE trades at €53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EXW1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXW1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EXW1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EXW1.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EUNW.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EUNW.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EUNW.DE trades at €94.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EUNW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUNW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to EUNW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EUNW.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XZMU.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XZMU.DE has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XZMU.DE trades at €59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XZMU.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZMU.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XZMU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XZMU.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IQQW.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IQQW.DE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IQQW.DE trades at €74.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IQQW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQQW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IQQW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IQQW.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs DBXE.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, DBXE.DE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while DBXE.DE trades at €57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DBXE.DE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXE.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to DBXE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check DBXE.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SPP1.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SPP1.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SPP1.DE trades at €21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SPP1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPP1.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to SPP1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SPP1.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs SXR7.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, SXR7.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while SXR7.DE trades at €199.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas SXR7.DE's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SXR7.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to SXR7.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check SXR7.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs VGWD.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, VGWD.DE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while VGWD.DE trades at €64.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas VGWD.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGWD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to VGWD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check VGWD.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs IE00B5KQNG97.SG Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, IE00B5KQNG97.SG has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while IE00B5KQNG97.SG trades at €54.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas IE00B5KQNG97.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to IE00B5KQNG97.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check IE00B5KQNG97.SG's competition here
CEMR.DE vs H4ZF.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, H4ZF.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while H4ZF.DE trades at €54.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas H4ZF.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to H4ZF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to H4ZF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check H4ZF.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs LCUW.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, LCUW.DE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while LCUW.DE trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas LCUW.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCUW.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to LCUW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check LCUW.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs EXIC.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, EXIC.F has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while EXIC.F trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas EXIC.F's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXIC.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to EXIC.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check EXIC.F's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XMME.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XMME.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XMME.DE trades at €57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XMME.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XMME.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XZW0.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XZW0.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XZW0.DE trades at €40.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XZW0.DE's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XZW0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XZW0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XZW0.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs DBXD.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, DBXD.DE has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while DBXD.DE trades at €224.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DBXD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DBXD.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to DBXD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check DBXD.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs DECR.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, DECR.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while DECR.DE trades at €47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas DECR.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DECR.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to DECR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check DECR.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs TCC4.DE Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, TCC4.DE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while TCC4.DE trades at €225.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas TCC4.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCC4.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is more volatile compared to TCC4.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check TCC4.DE's competition here
CEMR.DE vs XMME.F Comparison August 2025
CEMR.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CEMR.DE stands at 660.6M. In comparison, XMME.F has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CEMR.DE is priced at €13.54, while XMME.F trades at €46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CEMR.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.59, whereas XMME.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CEMR.DE's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMME.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CEMR.DE is less volatile compared to XMME.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CEMR.DE.Check XMME.F's competition here