CDTi Advanced Materials, Inc.
CDTi Advanced Materials, Inc. CDTI Peers
See (CDTI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTI | $0.36 | N/A | 1.5M | -0.60 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.57% |
| DNZOF | $14.29 | N/A | 40.3B | 14.15 | $1.01 | +3.04% |
| DNZOY | $13.17 | -0.23% | 37.1B | 13.04 | $1.01 | +0.94% |
| BRDCY | $21.26 | +0.47% | 28.8B | 15.29 | $1.39 | +2.08% |
| BRDCF | $42.50 | N/A | 28.8B | 15.29 | $2.78 | +3.10% |
| MGDDF | $37.78 | N/A | 26.7B | 3.38 | $11.17 | +4.12% |
| MGDDY | $18.84 | -0.53% | 26.6B | 8.44 | $2.23 | +4.01% |
| CTTAF | $85.63 | -0.00% | 17.1B | 12.93 | $6.62 | +2.92% |
| CTTAY | $8.43 | -2.66% | 16.9B | 12.77 | $0.66 | +2.96% |
Stock Comparison
CDTI vs FYGGY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and FYGGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs DNZOF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while DNZOF trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs DNZOY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while DNZOY trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs BRDCY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while BRDCY trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs BRDCF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while BRDCF trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs MGDDF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while MGDDF trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs MGDDY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while MGDDY trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs CTTAF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while CTTAF trades at $85.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs CTTAY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while CTTAY trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs KNRRY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while KNRRY trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs KNBHF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while KNBHF trades at $95.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs SMTOY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SMTOY trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs PTAIY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while PTAIY trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs PTAIF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs HLLGY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs HLKHF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs ASEKY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while ASEKY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs ASEKF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and ASEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs NGKSY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and NGKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs PLLIF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NGKSF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs SFFLY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SFFLY trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs YORUF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and YORUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs FESTF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs YORUY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs BRBOY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs KOTMY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while KOTMY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs SCFLF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs KOTMF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs MNTHY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while MNTHY trades at $58.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and MNTHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs BRBOF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while BRBOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs STAEY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs SMTUF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and SMTUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs LIMAF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while LIMAF trades at $44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs STAEF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and STAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs TDBOF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and TDBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs VLEEF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while VLEEF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NHKGF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs VLEEY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while VLEEY trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs VTSCF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and VTSCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs MNTHF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NPSKY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NPSKY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and NPSKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs NPSKF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs TGOSY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs ARBFF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs JELCF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs JEHLY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and JEHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs MBUMY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while MBUMY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs MBUMF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs GMPUF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and GMPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs UNIEF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NTXVF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs GUDDY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs FURCF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs PASTF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NIFCY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and NIFCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs NKRKY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NKRKY trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -25.13. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NKRKF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.98. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs TIANF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs GUDHF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs SFHLF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs ATNNF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs ABDDF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and ABDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs FAURY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 709.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and FAURY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs FCVFF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and FCVFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs NMAKF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 475.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NMAKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs MRETF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 424.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while MRETF trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs TCISF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and TCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs SAEOF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and SAEOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs VTSCY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and VTSCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs PWRHF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs ELLRY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while ELLRY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and ELLRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs EGKLF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NPSGF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NPSGY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs IOCJY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and IOCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs XNGIF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and XNGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs AKBIF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs EXCOF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 182.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while EXCOF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs WLMTF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs AMGRF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs HWAFF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and HWAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs KGAUF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs SCTH Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and SCTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs CAOHF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and CAOHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs LEAT Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while LEAT trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -159.60. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs STSGF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and STSGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs NWFAF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and NWFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs VOAXF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and VOAXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs CREVF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and CREVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs CCEGF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs CMMCF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs ATHHF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs UFMG Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and UFMG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs AFFL Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs OPTI Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs AMTY Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDTI.
CDTI vs NFGRF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and NFGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CDTI vs SPKTF Comparison
CDTI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDTI stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDTI is priced at $0.36, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDTI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.60, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CDTI's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDTI and SPKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).