Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel de Normandie-Seine Société coopérative
Caisse Régionale de Crédit Agricole Mutuel de Normandie-Seine Société coopérative (CCN.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCN.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCN.PA | €134.98 | -0.01% | 141.9M | 9.53 | €14.16 | +2.42% |
| BNP.PA | €83.30 | -2.44% | 91.8B | 8.10 | €10.29 | +8.86% |
| ACA.PA | €16.37 | -1.30% | 49.5B | 7.51 | €2.18 | +6.72% |
| GLE.PA | €64.24 | -2.61% | 46.9B | 9.45 | €6.80 | +2.65% |
| KBC.BR | €108.70 | -1.05% | 43.1B | 12.49 | €8.70 | +2.67% |
| XBBDC.MC | €3.24 | -0.61% | 34.3B | 9.26 | €0.35 | +0.94% |
| A5G.IR | €8.94 | -1.16% | 19B | 9.61 | €0.93 | +5.26% |
| BIRG.IR | €15.70 | +0.58% | 14.9B | 13.65 | €1.15 | +3.38% |
| BCP.LS | €0.86 | -0.94% | 12.8B | 12.35 | €0.07 | +3.47% |
| VLK.AS | €58.90 | -0.34% | 2.5B | 16.97 | €3.47 | +7.05% |
Stock Comparison
CCN.PA vs BNP.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, BNP.PA has a market cap of 91.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while BNP.PA trades at €83.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas BNP.PA's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNP.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to BNP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check BNP.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs ACA.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, ACA.PA has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while ACA.PA trades at €16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas ACA.PA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACA.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to ACA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check ACA.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs GLE.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, GLE.PA has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while GLE.PA trades at €64.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas GLE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLE.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to GLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check GLE.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs KBC.BR Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, KBC.BR has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while KBC.BR trades at €108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas KBC.BR's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBC.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to KBC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check KBC.BR's competition here
CCN.PA vs XBBDC.MC Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, XBBDC.MC has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while XBBDC.MC trades at €3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas XBBDC.MC's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XBBDC.MC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to XBBDC.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check XBBDC.MC's competition here
CCN.PA vs A5G.IR Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, A5G.IR has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while A5G.IR trades at €8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas A5G.IR's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A5G.IR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to A5G.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check A5G.IR's competition here
CCN.PA vs BIRG.IR Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, BIRG.IR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while BIRG.IR trades at €15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas BIRG.IR's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIRG.IR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to BIRG.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check BIRG.IR's competition here
CCN.PA vs BCP.LS Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, BCP.LS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while BCP.LS trades at €0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas BCP.LS's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCP.LS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to BCP.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check BCP.LS's competition here
CCN.PA vs VLK.AS Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, VLK.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while VLK.AS trades at €58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas VLK.AS's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLK.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to VLK.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check VLK.AS's competition here
CCN.PA vs PTSB.IR Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, PTSB.IR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while PTSB.IR trades at €2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas PTSB.IR's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PTSB.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to PTSB.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check PTSB.IR's competition here
CCN.PA vs IL0A.IR Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, IL0A.IR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while IL0A.IR trades at €2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas IL0A.IR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IL0A.IR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to IL0A.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check IL0A.IR's competition here
CCN.PA vs CAF.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CAF.PA has a market cap of 905.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CAF.PA trades at €113.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CAF.PA's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CAF.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs MLCFM.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, MLCFM.PA has a market cap of 733.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while MLCFM.PA trades at €1,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas MLCFM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLCFM.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is more volatile compared to MLCFM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check MLCFM.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CRBP2.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CRBP2.PA has a market cap of 392.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CRBP2.PA trades at €27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CRBP2.PA's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRBP2.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CRBP2.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CRBP2.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CNF.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CNF.PA has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CNF.PA trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CNF.PA's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNF.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CNF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CNF.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CIV.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CIV.PA has a market cap of 233M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CIV.PA trades at €104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CIV.PA's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CIV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CIV.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CMO.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CMO.PA has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CMO.PA trades at €103.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CMO.PA's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CMO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CMO.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs BNB.BR Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, BNB.BR has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while BNB.BR trades at €396.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas BNB.BR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNB.BR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to BNB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check BNB.BR's competition here
CCN.PA vs CRAV.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CRAV.PA has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CRAV.PA trades at €129.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CRAV.PA's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CRAV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CRAV.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CAT31.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CAT31.PA has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CAT31.PA trades at €113.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CAT31.PA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAT31.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CAT31.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CAT31.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CRLA.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CRLA.PA has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CRLA.PA trades at €79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CRLA.PA's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CRLA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CRLA.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CRTO.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CRTO.PA has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CRTO.PA trades at €127.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CRTO.PA's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRTO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CRTO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CRTO.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CRSU.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CRSU.PA has a market cap of 119M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CRSU.PA trades at €200.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CRSU.PA's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRSU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CRSU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CRSU.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CRAP.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CRAP.PA has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CRAP.PA trades at €139.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CRAP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CRAP.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs CRLO.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, CRLO.PA has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while CRLO.PA trades at €93.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas CRLO.PA's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRLO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to CRLO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check CRLO.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs MLGRC.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, MLGRC.PA has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while MLGRC.PA trades at €23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas MLGRC.PA's P/E ratio is 74.38. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLGRC.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is more volatile compared to MLGRC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check MLGRC.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs KN.PA Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, KN.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while KN.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas KN.PA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is less volatile compared to KN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check KN.PA's competition here
CCN.PA vs DD7E.IR Comparison April 2026
CCN.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCN.PA stands at 141.9M. In comparison, DD7E.IR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCN.PA is priced at €134.98, while DD7E.IR trades at €23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCN.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.53, whereas DD7E.IR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCN.PA's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DD7E.IR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCN.PA is more volatile compared to DD7E.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCN.PA.Check DD7E.IR's competition here