C&C Group plc
C&C Group plc (CCGPY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCGPY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCGPY | $7.29 | +0.00% | 900.8M | 60.75 | $0.12 | +2.86% |
| BUDFF | $58.08 | -13.30% | 115.2B | 17.08 | $3.40 | +1.69% |
| HEINY | $40.09 | -3.42% | 44.8B | 21.09 | $1.90 | +2.36% |
| HINKF | $78.90 | -5.04% | 44.1B | 20.71 | $3.81 | +2.56% |
| HKHHY | $34.66 | -3.40% | 19.6B | 18.10 | $1.92 | +2.89% |
| ASBRF | $13.00 | +1.56% | 19.5B | 15.48 | $0.84 | +2.74% |
| FMXUF | $9.80 | +0.00% | 18.5B | 23.90 | $0.41 | +5.79% |
| HKHHF | $67.00 | -4.58% | 18.2B | 17.45 | $3.84 | +2.96% |
| CABGY | $25.02 | -1.96% | 17B | 15.33 | $1.63 | +3.07% |
| CABJF | $125.65 | -0.98% | 16.8B | 15.67 | $8.02 | +3.11% |
Stock Comparison
CCGPY vs BUDFF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, BUDFF has a market cap of 115.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while BUDFF trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas BUDFF's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BUDFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to BUDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check BUDFF's competition here
CCGPY vs HEINY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, HEINY has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while HEINY trades at $40.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas HEINY's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HEINY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to HEINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check HEINY's competition here
CCGPY vs HINKF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, HINKF has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while HINKF trades at $78.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas HINKF's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HINKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to HINKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check HINKF's competition here
CCGPY vs HKHHY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, HKHHY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while HKHHY trades at $34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas HKHHY's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HKHHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to HKHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check HKHHY's competition here
CCGPY vs ASBRF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, ASBRF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while ASBRF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas ASBRF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ASBRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to ASBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check ASBRF's competition here
CCGPY vs FMXUF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, FMXUF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while FMXUF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas FMXUF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FMXUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to FMXUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check FMXUF's competition here
CCGPY vs HKHHF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, HKHHF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while HKHHF trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas HKHHF's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HKHHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to HKHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check HKHHF's competition here
CCGPY vs CABGY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, CABGY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while CABGY trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas CABGY's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CABGY's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to CABGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check CABGY's competition here
CCGPY vs CABJF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, CABJF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while CABJF trades at $125.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas CABJF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CABJF's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to CABJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check CABJF's competition here
CCGPY vs CABHF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, CABHF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while CABHF trades at $121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas CABHF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CABHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to CABHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check CABHF's competition here
CCGPY vs BDWBF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, BDWBF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while BDWBF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas BDWBF's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BDWBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to BDWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check BDWBF's competition here
CCGPY vs TSGTY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, TSGTY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while TSGTY trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas TSGTY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TSGTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to TSGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check TSGTY's competition here
CCGPY vs KNBWF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, KNBWF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while KNBWF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas KNBWF's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KNBWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to KNBWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check KNBWF's competition here
CCGPY vs CRHKY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, CRHKY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while CRHKY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas CRHKY's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CRHKY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to CRHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check CRHKY's competition here
CCGPY vs CRHKF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, CRHKF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while CRHKF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas CRHKF's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CRHKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to CRHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check CRHKF's competition here
CCGPY vs KNBWY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, KNBWY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while KNBWY trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas KNBWY's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KNBWY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to KNBWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check KNBWY's competition here
CCGPY vs MXGBF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, MXGBF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while MXGBF trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas MXGBF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MXGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to MXGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check MXGBF's competition here
CCGPY vs TSGTF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, TSGTF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while TSGTF trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas TSGTF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TSGTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to TSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check TSGTF's competition here
CCGPY vs STBFF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, STBFF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while STBFF trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas STBFF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to STBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check STBFF's competition here
CCGPY vs STBFY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, STBFY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while STBFY trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas STBFY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STBFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to STBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check STBFY's competition here
CCGPY vs ROYUF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, ROYUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while ROYUF trades at $81.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas ROYUF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ROYUF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to ROYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check ROYUF's competition here
CCGPY vs BDWBY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, BDWBY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while BDWBY trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas BDWBY's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BDWBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to BDWBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check BDWBY's competition here
CCGPY vs SOOBF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, SOOBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while SOOBF trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas SOOBF's P/E ratio is 49.53. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SOOBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to SOOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check SOOBF's competition here
CCGPY vs AEBZY Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, AEBZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while AEBZY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas AEBZY's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AEBZY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to AEBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check AEBZY's competition here
CCGPY vs CGPZF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, CGPZF has a market cap of 868.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while CGPZF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas CGPZF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CGPZF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to CGPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check CGPZF's competition here
CCGPY vs UMLGF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, UMLGF has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while UMLGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas UMLGF's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UMLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to UMLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check UMLGF's competition here
CCGPY vs BIBLF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, BIBLF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while BIBLF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas BIBLF's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BIBLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to BIBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check BIBLF's competition here
CCGPY vs SMGLF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, SMGLF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while SMGLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas SMGLF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SMGLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to SMGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check SMGLF's competition here
CCGPY vs BRBMF Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, BRBMF has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while BRBMF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas BRBMF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BRBMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to BRBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check BRBMF's competition here
CCGPY vs HVCW Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, HVCW has a market cap of 770.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while HVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas HVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HVCW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to HVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check HVCW's competition here
CCGPY vs SIPC Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, SIPC has a market cap of 378.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while SIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas SIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SIPC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to SIPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check SIPC's competition here
CCGPY vs EARI Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, EARI has a market cap of 169.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while EARI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas EARI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EARI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to EARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check EARI's competition here
CCGPY vs MRIB Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, MRIB has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while MRIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas MRIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MRIB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to MRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check MRIB's competition here
CCGPY vs MENB Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, MENB has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while MENB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas MENB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MENB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is more volatile compared to MENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check MENB's competition here
CCGPY vs GBEN Comparison July 2025
CCGPY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGPY stands at 900.8M. In comparison, GBEN has a market cap of 7. Regarding current trading prices, CCGPY is priced at $7.29, while GBEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGPY currently has a P/E ratio of 60.75, whereas GBEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGPY's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GBEN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGPY is less volatile compared to GBEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGPY.Check GBEN's competition here