China Shanshui Cement Group Limited
China Shanshui Cement Group Limited (CCGLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CCGLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCGLF | $0.25 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 2.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| HCMLY | $16.02 | +0.38% | 44.7B | 11.44 | $1.40 | +4.34% |
| HCMLF | $78.31 | +0.00% | 42.2B | 11.09 | $7.06 | +4.75% |
| HLBZF | $226.73 | -4.54% | 40.4B | 18.91 | $11.99 | +1.69% |
| CRHCF | $53.56 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 13.91 | $3.85 | +1.47% |
| UCLQF | $103.00 | +0.00% | 30.3B | 35.15 | $2.93 | +0.87% |
| GRSXY | $19.61 | +0.00% | 21.6B | 15.20 | $1.29 | +1.28% |
| AHCHF | $2.89 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 13.76 | $0.21 | +4.08% |
| AHCHY | $14.36 | -0.21% | 16.7B | 13.55 | $1.06 | +3.27% |
| JHIUF | $27.36 | +0.00% | 15.8B | 27.92 | $0.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CCGLF vs HCMLY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCMLY has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while HCMLY trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas HCMLY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCMLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to HCMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check HCMLY's competition here
CCGLF vs HCMLF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCMLF has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while HCMLF trades at $78.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas HCMLF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and HCMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCMLF's competition here
CCGLF vs HLBZF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HLBZF has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while HLBZF trades at $226.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas HLBZF's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HLBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to HLBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check HLBZF's competition here
CCGLF vs CRHCF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRHCF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CRHCF trades at $53.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CRHCF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRHCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and CRHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRHCF's competition here
CCGLF vs UCLQF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UCLQF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while UCLQF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas UCLQF's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to UCLQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and UCLQF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UCLQF's competition here
CCGLF vs GRSXY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRSXY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while GRSXY trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas GRSXY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GRSXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and GRSXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRSXY's competition here
CCGLF vs AHCHF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AHCHF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while AHCHF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas AHCHF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AHCHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to AHCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check AHCHF's competition here
CCGLF vs AHCHY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AHCHY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while AHCHY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas AHCHY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AHCHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to AHCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check AHCHY's competition here
CCGLF vs JHIUF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JHIUF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while JHIUF trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas JHIUF's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to JHIUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to JHIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check JHIUF's competition here
CCGLF vs IMYSY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IMYSY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while IMYSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas IMYSY's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IMYSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and IMYSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMYSY's competition here
CCGLF vs CXMSF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CXMSF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CXMSF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CXMSF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CXMSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CXMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CXMSF's competition here
CCGLF vs BZZUF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BZZUF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BZZUF trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BZZUF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZZUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to BZZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check BZZUF's competition here
CCGLF vs BZZUY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BZZUY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BZZUY trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BZZUY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BZZUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to BZZUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check BZZUY's competition here
CCGLF vs TGBMF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TGBMF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while TGBMF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas TGBMF's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TGBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and TGBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGBMF's competition here
CCGLF vs ADLDY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADLDY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while ADLDY trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas ADLDY's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADLDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to ADLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check ADLDY's competition here
CCGLF vs HDELY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HDELY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while HDELY trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas HDELY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HDELY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to HDELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check HDELY's competition here
CCGLF vs XYIGY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XYIGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while XYIGY trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas XYIGY's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to XYIGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and XYIGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XYIGY's competition here
CCGLF vs CBUMF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CBUMF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CBUMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CBUMF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CBUMF's competition here
CCGLF vs FCREY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FCREY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while FCREY trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas FCREY's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FCREY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to FCREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check FCREY's competition here
CCGLF vs BOALF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOALF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BOALF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BOALF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOALF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to BOALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check BOALF's competition here
CCGLF vs XYIGF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XYIGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while XYIGF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas XYIGF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to XYIGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and XYIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XYIGF's competition here
CCGLF vs BOALY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BOALY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BOALY trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BOALY's P/E ratio is 36.87. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BOALY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and BOALY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOALY's competition here
CCGLF vs WBRBY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WBRBY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while WBRBY trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas WBRBY's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WBRBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to WBRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check WBRBY's competition here
CCGLF vs WBRBF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WBRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while WBRBF trades at $31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas WBRBF's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WBRBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and WBRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WBRBF's competition here
CCGLF vs GCWOF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GCWOF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while GCWOF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas GCWOF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GCWOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to GCWOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check GCWOF's competition here
CCGLF vs THYCY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, THYCY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while THYCY trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas THYCY's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to THYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to THYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check THYCY's competition here
CCGLF vs IMYSF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IMYSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while IMYSF trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas IMYSF's P/E ratio is -26.57. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IMYSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to IMYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check IMYSF's competition here
CCGLF vs SDCVF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SDCVF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while SDCVF trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas SDCVF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SDCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to SDCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check SDCVF's competition here
CCGLF vs THYCF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, THYCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while THYCF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas THYCF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to THYCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and THYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THYCF's competition here
CCGLF vs CMZOF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMZOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CMZOF trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CMZOF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMZOF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and CMZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMZOF's competition here
CCGLF vs BRKWF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRKWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BRKWF trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BRKWF's P/E ratio is -83.86. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BRKWF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to BRKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check BRKWF's competition here
CCGLF vs FRCEF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FRCEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while FRCEF trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas FRCEF's P/E ratio is -14.35. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRCEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to FRCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check FRCEF's competition here
CCGLF vs HCPHY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HCPHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while HCPHY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas HCPHY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HCPHY's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and HCPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCPHY's competition here
CCGLF vs CARCY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CARCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CARCY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CARCY's P/E ratio is 56.92. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CARCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and CARCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CARCY's competition here
CCGLF vs CJRCF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CJRCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CJRCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CJRCF's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CJRCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CJRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CJRCF's competition here
CCGLF vs PITPF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PITPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PITPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PITPF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PITPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to PITPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check PITPF's competition here
CCGLF vs ADBCF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ADBCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while ADBCF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas ADBCF's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ADBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and ADBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBCF's competition here
CCGLF vs WCHNF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WCHNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while WCHNF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas WCHNF's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WCHNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and WCHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WCHNF's competition here
CCGLF vs PITPY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PITPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PITPY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PITPY's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PITPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to PITPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check PITPY's competition here
CCGLF vs PSGTF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PSGTF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PSGTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PSGTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSGTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to PSGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check PSGTF's competition here
CCGLF vs PSGTY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PSGTY has a market cap of 979M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PSGTY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PSGTY's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSGTY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to PSGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check PSGTY's competition here
CCGLF vs PTHIF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTHIF has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PTHIF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PTHIF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTHIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and PTHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTHIF's competition here
CCGLF vs SUCEF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUCEF has a market cap of 859.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while SUCEF trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas SUCEF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SUCEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to SUCEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check SUCEF's competition here
CCGLF vs IBJHF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IBJHF has a market cap of 813M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while IBJHF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas IBJHF's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IBJHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to IBJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check IBJHF's competition here
CCGLF vs BBMPY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BBMPY has a market cap of 811.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BBMPY trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BBMPY's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BBMPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to BBMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check BBMPY's competition here
CCGLF vs FTTRF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FTTRF has a market cap of 661.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while FTTRF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas FTTRF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FTTRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and FTTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FTTRF's competition here
CCGLF vs MCEM Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MCEM has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while MCEM trades at $230.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas MCEM's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MCEM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to MCEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check MCEM's competition here
CCGLF vs CMTOY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMTOY has a market cap of 578M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CMTOY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CMTOY's P/E ratio is 370.00. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CMTOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and CMTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMTOY's competition here
CCGLF vs CWXZF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CWXZF has a market cap of 547.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CWXZF trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CWXZF's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CWXZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CWXZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CWXZF's competition here
CCGLF vs CGCLF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CGCLF has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CGCLF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CGCLF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CGCLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CGCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CGCLF's competition here
CCGLF vs PPCLY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PPCLY has a market cap of 425.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PPCLY trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PPCLY's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PPCLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and PPCLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PPCLY's competition here
CCGLF vs BHBSY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BHBSY has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BHBSY trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BHBSY's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BHBSY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and BHBSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHBSY's competition here
CCGLF vs CHYMF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHYMF has a market cap of 318M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CHYMF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CHYMF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHYMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CHYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CHYMF's competition here
CCGLF vs BSND Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BSND has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BSND trades at $855.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BSND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BSND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to BSND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check BSND's competition here
CCGLF vs TGAFF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TGAFF has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while TGAFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas TGAFF's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TGAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and TGAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGAFF's competition here
CCGLF vs BURCP Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BURCP has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BURCP trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BURCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BURCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and BURCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BURCP's competition here
CCGLF vs CBUMY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CBUMY has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CBUMY trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CBUMY's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CBUMY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CBUMY's competition here
CCGLF vs SPPCF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SPPCF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while SPPCF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas SPPCF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPPCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and SPPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPPCF's competition here
CCGLF vs ZHIXF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZHIXF has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while ZHIXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas ZHIXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZHIXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and ZHIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZHIXF's competition here
CCGLF vs RTGOF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RTGOF has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while RTGOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas RTGOF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to RTGOF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and RTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTGOF's competition here
CCGLF vs CTXXF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CTXXF has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CTXXF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CTXXF's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTXXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to CTXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check CTXXF's competition here
CCGLF vs ACPS Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ACPS has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while ACPS trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas ACPS's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ACPS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and ACPS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACPS's competition here
CCGLF vs PTHIY Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTHIY has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PTHIY trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PTHIY's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTHIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and PTHIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTHIY's competition here
CCGLF vs BASA Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BASA has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while BASA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas BASA's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BASA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to BASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check BASA's competition here
CCGLF vs LKSGF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LKSGF has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while LKSGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas LKSGF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LKSGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to LKSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check LKSGF's competition here
CCGLF vs PNLT Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PNLT has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while PNLT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas PNLT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNLT's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and PNLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNLT's competition here
CCGLF vs SNLP Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SNLP has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while SNLP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas SNLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SNLP's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and SNLP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNLP's competition here
CCGLF vs CHGS Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHGS has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while CHGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas CHGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CHGS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and CHGS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHGS's competition here
CCGLF vs WWST Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WWST has a market cap of 33. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while WWST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas WWST's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WWST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and WWST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWST's competition here
CCGLF vs LXRRF Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LXRRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while LXRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas LXRRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LXRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and LXRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LXRRF's competition here
CCGLF vs TJSS Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TJSS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while TJSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas TJSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TJSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF is less volatile compared to TJSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCGLF.Check TJSS's competition here
CCGLF vs AQCP Comparison August 2025
CCGLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCGLF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AQCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CCGLF is priced at $0.25, while AQCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCGLF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.27, whereas AQCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCGLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AQCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCGLF and AQCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AQCP's competition here