Cascadero Copper Corporation
Cascadero Copper Corporation CCEDF Peers
See (CCEDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEDF | $0.01 | +4.44% | 2.8M | -0.94 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| CHZQ | $0.01 | +4900.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.01 | -4.00% | 121.8B | 10.72 | $2.24 | +5.17% |
| RTPPF | $59.00 | +1.90% | 99.9B | 8.35 | $7.07 | +6.81% |
| RTNTF | $67.50 | -9.16% | 96.3B | 9.55 | $7.07 | +3.48% |
| GLNCY | $7.68 | -1.98% | 46.3B | -29.52 | -$0.26 | +2.80% |
| GLCNF | $3.85 | -2.20% | 45.9B | -29.64 | -$0.13 | +2.99% |
| GMBXF | $5.50 | -2.31% | 42.8B | 11.46 | $0.48 | +4.45% |
| AAUKF | $28.50 | N/A | 39.3B | -9.93 | -$2.87 | +2.23% |
| FSUMF | $10.55 | +1.44% | 32.4B | 8.31 | $1.27 | +8.39% |
Stock Comparison
CCEDF vs CHZQ Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while CHZQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs BHPLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while BHPLF trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs RTPPF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while RTPPF trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs RTNTF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while RTNTF trades at $67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs GLNCY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while GLNCY trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -29.52. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs GLCNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while GLCNF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -29.64. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs GMBXF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while GMBXF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs AAUKF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while AAUKF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs FSUMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while FSUMF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs FSUGY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while FSUGY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs NGLOY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while NGLOY trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs CNSUF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while CNSUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to CNSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs CMCLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while CMCLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs POTRF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, POTRF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while POTRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas POTRF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to POTRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to POTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs TCKRF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while TCKRF trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 670.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs JXMNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs IPOAF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while IPOAF trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs IVPAF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while IVPAF trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs BOLIF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs BDNNY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while BDNNY trades at $59.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs SHTLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while SHTLF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ZNWLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ZNWLF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ZNWLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ZNWLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ZNWLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ZNWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ABML Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs STMNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs SMMYY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while SMMYY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 58.45. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs LYSDY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while LYSDY trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 156.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs LYSCF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while LYSCF trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 154.71. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PUTKF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PUTKY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PUTKY trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs NILSY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PAEKY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs JMXXF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while JMXXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MALRY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MALRY trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs FLMMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PILBF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PILBF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs AFBOF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while AFBOF trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PWCRF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PWCRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to PWCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs NGXXF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while NGXXF trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -37.54. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PTNDY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs IPGDF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while IPGDF trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ARDNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ARDNF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ARDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MIMTF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MIMTF trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PTNDF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs AZZVF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs IIDDY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while IIDDY trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs DWMNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while DWMNF trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MALRF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MALRF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs SOUHY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while SOUHY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -37.12. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ERMAF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAF trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 100.53. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ERMAY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ERMAY trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.17. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs NCKAF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while NCKAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs CXXMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CXXMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while CXXMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CXXMF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to CXXMF's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to CXXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs NICMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while NICMF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs DETRF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while DETRF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ADTLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ADTLF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs BQSSF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while BQSSF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -72.95. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ADMLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ADMLF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs AZRMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs AUSDF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs STTSY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while STTSY trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ILKAY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ILKAF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ILKAF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs LINRF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while LINRF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -43.54. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MFRVF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs FMCXF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 983.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while FMCXF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -58.27. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs TTNNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 980.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while TTNNF trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ATUSF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 923.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ATUSF trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs OSTTF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while OSTTF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs TAOFF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 893.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while TAOFF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs GERFF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 840.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs AFMJF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 807.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while AFMJF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs AMVMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ALMTF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 662.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ALMTF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs VULNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while VULNF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MJDLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 568M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MJDLF trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs PKREF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 537.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs BIRNF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while BIRNF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MCRZF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MCHHF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 444M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs FGOVF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while FGOVF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -82.95. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs CGMLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs REEMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 387.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while REEMF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs NQMIY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MLYF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs WYCC Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, WYCC has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while WYCC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas WYCC's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to WYCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to WYCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs CTJHY Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while CTJHY trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs BELMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 342.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while BELMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to BELMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs KMRPF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs FWEDF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while FWEDF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MLYCF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MLYCF has a market cap of 323.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MLYCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MLYCF's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MLYCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MLYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MLXEF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MLXEF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs MNXMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 314.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while MNXMF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -54.69. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ARAFF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs ERLFF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while ERLFF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.47. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs LTSRF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 299.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs SVMLF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while SVMLF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs SLGGF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 285.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs EGMMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, EGMMF has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while EGMMF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas EGMMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to EGMMF's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is less volatile compared to EGMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.
CCEDF vs BSSMF Comparison
CCEDF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCEDF stands at 2.8M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCEDF is priced at $0.01, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCEDF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.94, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, CCEDF's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCEDF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCEDF.