CCL Industries Inc.
CCL Industries Inc. CCDBF Peers
See (CCDBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCDBF | $58.17 | +1.20% | 10.2B | 16.62 | $3.50 | +1.50% |
| DSSMY | $30.00 | +14.90% | 41.5B | 37.04 | $0.81 | +3.38% |
| NPKLY | $21.00 | +84.21% | 34.7B | -2100.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMFTF | $49.11 | N/A | 25.5B | 15.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| SMFKY | $45.96 | -0.13% | 24.8B | 14.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| AMCCF | $9.15 | +1.67% | 21.1B | 16.34 | $0.56 | +5.54% |
| INPAP | $84.99 | +0.00% | 19.6B | N/A | N/A | +5.88% |
| DITHF | $7.22 | -3.86% | 10B | 36.10 | $0.20 | +3.27% |
| CCLLF | $52.88 | -0.00% | 9.3B | 15.08 | $3.51 | +1.79% |
| SCBGF | $19.98 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 33.05 | $0.59 | +3.08% |
Stock Comparison
CCDBF vs DSSMY Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs NPKLY Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NPKLY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while NPKLY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NPKLY's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NPKLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to NPKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SMFTF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to SMFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SMFKY Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs AMCCF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while AMCCF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to AMCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs INPAP Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, INPAP has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while INPAP trades at $84.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas INPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INPAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to INPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs DITHF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while DITHF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs CCLLF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while CCLLF trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to CCLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SCBGF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SCBGF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SCBGF trades at $19.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SCBGF's P/E ratio is 33.05. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to SCBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SIGCY Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SIGCY trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs VDRFF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while VDRFF trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to VDRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs HOYFF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while HOYFF trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to HOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs WIPKF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while WIPKF trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to WIPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs ORRYY Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while ORRYY trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to ORRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs ORRAF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while ORRAF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to ORRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs MNHFF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while MNHFF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to MNHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs ELPKF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while ELPKF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs FRFTF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 926.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while FRFTF trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs FUJSF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while FUJSF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs PCTGY Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to PCTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs CADNF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 654.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while CADNF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is -215.67. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CADNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to CADNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs GRVWF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to GRVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs JSPCF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while JSPCF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to JSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs HXGCF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 366.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while HXGCF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to HXGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SNGSF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SNGSF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to SNGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs VKSC Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while VKSC trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to VKSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SUMXF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SUMXF has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SUMXF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SUMXF's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUMXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to SUMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs IFLXF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while IFLXF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to IFLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs NEXNF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while NEXNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to NEXNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs YIKWF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to YIKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SPQDF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SPQDF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SPQDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SPQDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPQDF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to SPQDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs IDND Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while IDND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs MAYX Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while MAYX trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to MAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs RDVA Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while RDVA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is less volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs GDNPF Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 976K. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to GDNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs EPTI Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 134.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while EPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs TZPC Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 53.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while TZPC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs ACGX Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 47.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while ACGX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to ACGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs PGOG Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while PGOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PGOG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to PGOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs ACTX Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while ACTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to ACTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs SINC Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SINC has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while SINC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas SINC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SINC's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to SINC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.
CCDBF vs GPRC Comparison
CCDBF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CCDBF stands at 10.2B. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, CCDBF is priced at $58.17, while GPRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CCDBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.62, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CCDBF's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CCDBF is more volatile compared to GPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CCDBF.